Finance
Q1
Q2
| Date | Sales |
| 39933 | 14833 |
| 40025 | 15067 |
| 40117 | 15276 |
| 40209 | 20181 |
| 40298 | 15593 |
| 40390 | 15532 |
| 40482 | 15605 |
| 40574 | 20661 |
| 40663 | 15935 |
| 40755 | 16240 |
| 40847 | 16402 |
| 40939 | 21288 |
| 41029 | 16867 |
| 41121 | 16779 |
| 41213 | 16929 |
| 41305 | 22726 |
| 41394 | 16706 |
| 41486 | 17117 |
| 41578 | 17258 |
| 41670 | 21515 |
| 41759 | 17050 |
| 41851 | 17406 |
| 41943 | 17732 |
| 42035 | 21751 |
| 42124 | 17119 |
| 42216 | 17427 |
| 42308 | 17613 |
| 42400 | 21626 |
| 42490 | 16196 |
| 42582 | 16169 |
| 42674 | 16441 |
Q3
| Bob's Rawhide Company | |||||||
| EPS | 1.25 | C) | ROE | 0.0 | 0.0 Timothy R. Mayes, Ph.D.: Timothy R. Mayes, Ph.D.: I've used a custom number format here to hide the formula and label the column. |
||
| Payout Ratio | 65% | 10% | |||||
| ROE | 11% | 11% | |||||
| Required Return | 8% | 12% | |||||
| 13% | |||||||
| A) | Growth Rate | 14% | |||||
| 15% | |||||||
| Value without Growth | 16% | ||||||
| Value of Growth Opportunities | 17% | ||||||
| B) | Value of Stock | 18% | |||||
| 19% | |||||||
| D) | Constant Growth DDM Value | 20% | |||||
| 21% | |||||||
| 22% | |||||||
| 23% | |||||||
| 24% | |||||||
| 25% | |||||||
| 26% | |||||||
| 27% | |||||||
| 28% | |||||||
| 29% | |||||||
| 30% | |||||||
| D) Using the constant growth model | |||||||
| ROE | Value | ||||||
| 10% | |||||||
| 11% | |||||||
| 12% | |||||||
| 13% | |||||||
| 14% | |||||||
| 15% | |||||||
| 16% | |||||||
| 17% | |||||||
| 18% | |||||||
| 19% | |||||||
| 20% | |||||||
Stock Value as ROE Rises
Value 0.1 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14000000000000001 0.15000000000000002 0.16000000000000003 0.17000000000000004 0.18000000000000005 0.19000000000000006 0.2 0000000000000007 0.21000000000000008 0.22000000000000008 0.23000000000000009 0.2400000000000001 0.25000000000000011 0.26000000000000012 0.27000000000000013 0.28000000000000014 0.29000000000000015 0.30000000000000016Return on Equity
Stock Value
The model breaks down once the growth rate is greater than or equal to the required return. When this happens, the value of the stock becomes negative, which doesn't make economic sense due to the limited liability of shareholders.