| 1. Each year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash tests new car models |
| to determine how well they protect the driver and the front-seat passenger in a head-on collision. |
| The NHTSA has developed a “star” scoring system for the frontal crash tests, with results ranging from |
| one star (*) to five stars (*****). The more stars in the rating, the better the level of crash protection |
| in a head-on collision. The NHTSA crash test results for 98 cars in a recent model year are given below. |
| | Star Score | Freq. |
| | 2 | 4 |
| | 3 | 17 |
| | 4 | 59 |
| | 5 | 18 |
| Part A: Use the frequency distributed data to calculate the descriptive statistics below. |
| You may want to use the descriptive statistics for frequency data worksheet. |
| | | N = |
| | | Mean= |
| | | Sample Variance= |
| | | Standard Deviation= |
| | | Standard Error= |
| | | CV= |
| | | Skewness (g1) = |
| | | Kurtosis (g2) = |
| Part B Use the data above to draw a frequency histogram (bar chart). Be sure to label the axes |
| appropriately and use good graphing technique. When you are finished, move it into the space |
| provided below. You can use the corners of the plot to adjust the size if necessary. |
| 2. A study of the characteristics of cheek teeth (e.g., molars) in an extinct primate species was published |
| in a recent (2010) issue of the American Journal of Physical Anthropology. Data on dentary depth of |
| molars (in millimeters) for 18 cheek teeth extracted from skulls are reproduced below. |
| | Dentary Depth (mm) |
| | 18.12 |
| | 19.48 |
| | 19.36 |
| | 15.94 |
| | 15.83 |
| | 19.70 |
| | 15.76 |
| | 17.00 |
| | 13.96 |
| | 16.55 |
| | 15.70 |
| | 17.83 |
| | 13.25 |
| | 16.12 |
| | 18.13 |
| | 14.02 |
| | 14.04 |
| | 16.20 |
| Calculate the statistics listed below for the data on dentary depth. Pay attention to decimal places and be |
| sure to include the units. You may use any method (cell functions or the descriptive statistics data |
| analysis tool) to obtain your answers. |
| | | | Units |
| | Mean= |
| | Median= |
| | Mode= |
| | Sample Variance= |
| | Standard Deviation= |
| | Standard Error= |
| | Kurtosis= |
| | Skewness= |
| 95% Confidence Limits | | | Units |
| | Upper Boundary= |
| | Lower Boundary= |
| 3. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists reports that 32% of all births in the US take |
| place by Cesarean section each year. (National Vital Statistics Reports, 2010). If, at a local Denver |
| Hospital, 25 women gave birth last weekend. |
| What’s the expected number of women who gave birth by Cesarean section? |
| Answer = |
| What's the probability that the number of Cesarean section births was 11? |
| Answer = |
| What's the probability that the number of Cesarean sections was fewer than 4? |
| Answer = |
| What's the probability that the number of Cesarean sections was 10 or more? |
| Answer = |
| 4. A “planet transit” is a rare celestial event in which a planet appears to cross in front of its star as |
| seen from Earth. The planet transit causes a noticeable dip in the star’s brightness, allowing scientists |
| to detect a new planet even though it is not directly visible. The National Aeronautics and Space |
| Administration (NASA) recently launched its Kepler mission, designed to discover new planets in |
| the Milky Way by detecting extrasolar planet transits. After one year of the mission in which 3000 |
| stars were monitored, NASA announced that five planet transits were detected. Assume the number of |
| transits discovered for every 3000 stars follows a Poisson distribution with a mean of 5. What’s the |
| probability that, in the next 3000 stars monitored by the Kepler mission: |
| more than 10 planet transits will be seen? |
| Answer = |
| exactly 3 planet transits will be seen? |
| Answer = |
| fewer than 5 planet transits will be seen? |
| Answer = |
| 5. Aquatic Biology (2010) reported on a study of green sea turtles inhabiting the Grand Cayman South |
| Sound Lagoon. The data on curved carapace (shell) length (in centimeters) for 23 captured turtles |
| are given below. Do the appropriate statistical test to answer the question of whether or not the |
| sample of turtles belongs to a population with a mean of 52.6 cm. |
| | Carapace Length (cm) |
| | 42.43 |
| | 49.96 |
| | 46.04 |
| | 48.76 |
| | 47.78 |
| | 45.81 |
| | 49.05 |
| | 49.65 |
| | 49.71 |
| | 54.29 |
| | 52.01 |
| | 51.15 |
| | 54.42 |
| | 52.62 |
| | 53.27 |
| | 54.07 |
| | 50.40 |
| | 53.69 |
| | 51.30 |
| | 54.29 |
| | 54.58 |
| | 55.11 |
| | 57.65 |
| | | Ho = |
| | | Ha = |
| | | test statistic = |
| | | df = |
| | | Exact probability of the test statistic = |
| | | Conclusion relative to the hypothesis. |
| 6. Because they share an identical genotype, twins make ideal subjects for investigating the degree |
| to which various environmental conditions affect personality. The classical method for studying this |
| phenomenon is the study of identical twins separated early in life and reared apart. The data below |
| represent IQ scores for 32 pairs of identical twins where one twin (A) was reared by a natural parent |
| and the other twin (B) was reared by a relative or some other person. Do the appropriate statistical |
| test to determine if there is a significant difference between the average IQ scores of identical |
| twins when one member of the pair is reared by the natural parents and the other member of the |
| pair is not. Make no assumptions and show all work. |
| | Pair ID | TWIN-A | TWIN-B |
| | 112 | 113 | 109 |
| | 114 | 94 | 100 |
| | 126 | 99 | 86 |
| | 132 | 77 | 80 |
| | 136 | 81 | 95 |
| | 148 | 91 | 106 |
| | 170 | 111 | 117 |
| | 172 | 104 | 107 |
| | 174 | 85 | 85 |
| | 180 | 66 | 84 |
| | 184 | 111 | 125 |
| | 186 | 51 | 66 |
| | 202 | 109 | 108 |
| | 216 | 122 | 121 |
| | 218 | 97 | 98 |
| | 220 | 82 | 94 |
| | 228 | 100 | 88 |
| | 232 | 100 | 104 |
| | 236 | 93 | 84 |
| | 306 | 99 | 95 |
| | 308 | 109 | 98 |
| | 312 | 95 | 100 |
| | 314 | 75 | 86 |
| | 324 | 104 | 103 |
| | 328 | 73 | 78 |
| | 330 | 88 | 99 |
| | 338 | 92 | 111 |
| | 342 | 108 | 110 |
| | 344 | 88 | 83 |
| | 350 | 90 | 82 |
| | 352 | 79 | 76 |
| | 416 | 97 | 98 |
| | Ho = |
| | Ha = |
| | ts = |
| | df = |
| | The exact probability of ts = |
| | Conclusion relative to the hypothesis. |
| 7. Do a correlation analysis on the IQ scores for the identical twins in problem 6. |
| Put your statistical results below. |
| | | Ho = |
| | | Ha = |
| | | test statistic = |
| | | df = |
| | | Exact probability of the test statistic = |
| | Conclusion relative to the hypothesis. |
| 8. A dietitian has developed a diet that is low in fats, carbohydrates, and cholesterol. Although the |
| diet was initially intended to be used by people with heart disease, the dietitian wishes to examine |
| the effect of this diet on the weights of obese people. Two random samples of 25 obese people are |
| selected, and one group of 25 is placed on the low-fat diet (low-fat). The other 25 are placed on a diet |
| that contains approximately the same quantity of food, but is not as low in fats, carbohydrates, and |
| cholesterol (regular). For each person, the amount of weight lost (in LBS) in a three-week period was |
| recorded and presented below. Do the appropriate statistical test to determine whether the |
| weight loss on the low-fat diet was greater than the weight loss on the regular diet. Make no |
| assumptions and show all work. |
| | Low-Fat | Regular |
| | 8 | 2 |
| | 10 | 6 |
| | 10 | 11 |
| | 12 | 7 |
| | 9 | 9 |
| | 3 | 8 |
| | 11 | 5 |
| | 7 | 8 |
| | 9 | 7 |
| | 2 | 6 |
| | 21 | 2 |
| | 8 | 6 |
| | 9 | 8 |
| | 2 | 5 |
| | 2 | 7 |
| | 20 | 6 |
| | 14 | 8 |
| | 11 | 6 |
| | 15 | 8 |
| | 6 | 13 |
| | 13 | 1 |
| | 8 | 9 |
| | 10 | 8 |
| | 12 | 12 |
| | 1 | 10 |
| | | Ho = |
| | | Ha = |
| | | test statistic = |
| | | df = |
| | | Exact probability of the test statistic = |
| | | Conclusion relative to the hypothesis. |
| | | What is the Statistical Power of this test?: |
| | | Answer: | | % |
| | Statistical Power Calculator: | https://www.dssresearch.com/KnowledgeCenter/toolkitcalculators/statisticalpowercalculators.aspx |
| 9. In all-electric homes, the amount of electricity expended is of interest to consumers, builders, and |
| groups involved with energy conservation. Suppose we wish to investigate the monthly electrical |
| usage in all-electric homes and its relationship to size of the home. The data are given below. |
| | | Monthly Usage |
| | Home Size (ft2) | kilowatt-hours |
| | 1290 | 1182 |
| | 1350 | 1172 |
| | 1470 | 1264 |
| | 1600 | 1493 |
| | 1710 | 1571 |
| | 1840 | 1711 |
| | 1980 | 1804 |
| | 2230 | 1840 |
| | 2400 | 1956 |
| | 2710 | 2007 |
| | 2930 | 1984 |
| | 3000 | 1960 |
| Part A. Is there a significant functional relationship between electricity utilization and the size of the home? |
| In other words, does monthly electricity usage depend on home size? Do the appropriate statistical test |
| and put your results in the boxes provided. |
| | | Ho = |
| | | Ha = |
| | | test statistic = |
| | | df = |
| | | Exact probability of the test statistic = |
| | | Conclusion relative to the hypothesis. |
| Part B. Using appropriate graphic skills, plot the data presented in Part A. Include the |
| regression line and the r2 value in your plot. Put the plot below. Make the plot attractive |
| and use good graphing techniques (pay attention to size of axes labels, colors, etc) |
| 10. The data below are from a published report on children who repeat a grade in elementary school |
| (Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2004). The researchers compared Australian schoolchildren who |
| repeated a grade and recorded the data for girls and boys separately. Do the appropriate statistical |
| test to determine whether repeating a grade is independent of gender. |
| | | Boys | Girls |
| | Never Repeated a Grade | 1349 | 1366 |
| | Repeated Grade | 86 | 43 |
| | Ho = |
| | Ha = |
| | test statistic = |
| | df = |
| | Exact prob. of the test statistic = |
| | Conclusion relative to the hypothesis. |
| 11A. Pediatric researchers at Pennsylvania State University carried out a designed study to test whether |
| a teaspoon of honey before bed calms a child’s cough (Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, |
| 2007). A sample of 63 children, who were ill with an upper respiratory tract infection, and their parents |
| participated in the study. On the first night, the parents rated their children’s cough symptoms on a |
| scale of 0 (no problems at all) to 30 (extremely severe). On the second night, the parents were |
| instructed to give their sick child a dosage of liquid “medicine” prior to bedtime. Unknown to the |
| parents, some were given a dosage of dextromethorphan (DM), an over-the-counter cough medicine, |
| while others were given a similar dose of honey. A third group of parents (the control group) gave |
| their sick children no dosage at all. Again, the parents rated their children’s cough symptoms, and |
| the improvement in total cough symptoms score was determined for each child. Is there evidence |
| that the treatments were significantly different with respect to improvement score? |
| | Honey | DM | Control |
| | 10 | 3 | 7 |
| | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| | 10 | 9 | 12 |
| | 8 | 12 | 7 |
| | 11 | 7 | 9 |
| | 12 | 6 | 7 |
| | 12 | 8 | 9 |
| | 8 | 12 | 5 |
| | 12 | 12 | 11 |
| | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| | 11 | 12 | 5 |
| | 15 | 13 | 6 |
| | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| | 15 | 10 | 8 |
| | 9 | 13 | 6 |
| | 13 | 9 | 7 |
| | 8 | 4 | 10 |
| | 12 | 4 | 9 |
| | 10 | 10 | 4 |
| | 8 | 15 | 8 |
| | 9 | 9 | 7 |
| | | Ho = |
| | | Ha = |
| | | test statistic = |
| | | df = |
| | | Exact probability of the test statistic = |
| | | Conclusion relative to the hypothesis. |
| 11B. Which means in the data set above are significantly different from each other? |
| Perform a Tukey's HSD Procedure on the data above in order to determine the |
| answer to this question. The online calculator can be found at: |
| http://astatsa.com/OneWay_Anova_with_TukeyHSD/ |
| Copy and paste the online results out to the below. |
| Using the lines provide below, underline means that are not significantly different at the .05 level |
| Use the minimum number of lines that are necessary to accurately depict the relationships between the means. |
| The length of a line can be changed by clicking on it and then grabbing either end with the mouse cursor. |
| | Honey | DM | Control |
| | 10.4 | 8.7 | 7.7 |
| 12. In the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, psychologists investigated the potential harmful |
| effects of violent music lyrics. The researchers theorized that listening to a song with violent lyrics |
| will lead to more violent thoughts and actions. A total of 60 undergraduate college students participated |
| in an experiment designed by the researchers. Half of the students were volunteers, and half were |
| required to participate as part of their introductory psychology class. Each student listened to a |
| song by the group “Tool,” with half the students randomly assigned to a song with violent lyrics |
| and half assigned a song with nonviolent lyrics. After listening to the song, each student was given |
| a list of word pairs and asked to rate the similarity of each word in the pair on a seven-point scale. |
| One word in each pair was aggressive in meeting (e. g., choke) and the other was ambiguous (e. g., |
| night). An aggressive cognition score was assigned on the basis of the average word-pair scores. The |
| higher the score, the more the subject associated an ambiguous word with a violent word. The data |
| are given below. Conduct the appropriate ANOVA on these data and put your results in the box |
| provided. |
| | | Psychology |
| | | Class | Volunteer |
| | Non-violent Lyrics | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| | | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| | | 2.9 | 2.5 |
| | | 3.0 | 2.6 |
| | | 2.6 | 3.6 |
| | | 2.4 | 4.0 |
| | | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| | | 3.3 | 3.7 |
| | | 3.7 | 2.8 |
| | | 3.3 | 2.9 |
| | | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| | | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| | | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| | | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| | | 3.1 | 2.4 |
| | Violent Lyrics | 3.4 | 4.1 |
| | | 3.9 | 3.5 |
| | | 4.2 | 3.4 |
| | | 3.2 | 4.1 |
| | | 4.3 | 3.7 |
| | | 3.3 | 2.8 |
| | | 3.1 | 3.4 |
| | | 3.2 | 4.0 |
| | | 3.8 | 2.5 |
| | | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| | | 3.8 | 3.4 |
| | | 4.1 | 3.5 |
| | | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| | | 3.8 | 3.1 |
| | | 4.5 | 3.6 |
| Analyze these data using the appropriate model of 2-way ANOVA. Give your results using standard format |
| (the hypotheses and your conclusions relative to the hypotheses). |
| 13. With respect to the data presented in problem 12, what if the data on violent versus non-violent |
| lyrics were taken from four randomly selected introductory psychology class sections (out of the |
| eight sections of introductory psychology classes that were available). So, instead of psychology |
| class versus volunteer in the columns, each of the four data groups were obtained from the four |
| randomly selected sections. Two of the sections listened to a “Tool” song with non-violent lyrics |
| and two of the sections listened to a song with violent lyrics. Since the class sections are not replicated |
| within the lyric treatments, this represents a nested ANOVA design, with class sections nested within |
| lyric treatments. |
| | | Class Sections |
| | | Section A | Section B |
| | Non-violent Lyrics | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| | | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| | | 2.9 | 2.5 |
| | | 3.0 | 2.6 |
| | | 2.6 | 3.6 |
| | | 2.4 | 4.0 |
| | | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| | | 3.3 | 3.7 |
| | | 3.7 | 2.8 |
| | | 3.3 | 2.9 |
| | | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| | | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| | | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| | | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| | | 3.1 | 2.4 |
| | Violent Lyrics | 3.4 | 4.1 |
| | | 3.9 | 3.5 |
| | | 4.2 | 3.4 |
| | | 3.2 | 4.1 |
| | | 4.3 | 3.7 |
| | | 3.3 | 2.8 |
| | | 3.1 | 3.4 |
| | | 3.2 | 4.0 |
| | | 3.8 | 2.5 |
| | | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| | | 3.8 | 3.4 |
| | | 4.1 | 3.5 |
| | | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| | | 3.8 | 3.1 |
| | | 4.5 | 3.6 |
| Analyze the data above as a 2-level nested ANOVA. Put your hypotheses and your conclusions in the box provided |
| using our standard format. The correct ANOVA table should be put out to the right. Think about which |
| factor is the top level in this analysis. |
| Hypotheses: |
| Conclusions: |
| Enjoy the rest of your summer! |