reading assignment BASED on the attached files

Comp #1:

Comp #2:

Criteria

Max. Points

Score – Comp #1

Comments – Comp #1

Score – Comp #2

Comments – Comp #2

Expertise, Experience & Training Plus Prior Contracting History (25%) – The expertise, experience and training of the proposer and its key personnel and previous experience with similar work in similar fields and qualifications and depth of the staff that will perform the work on this project.  This factor includes evaluation of the proposer’s prior contracting history, including the review of the proposer’s certifications relating to false claims, debarment and civil litigation.

25

Project Approach (40%) – The proposer’s responsiveness in developing a comprehensive plan while meeting regulatory requirements and the City’s specific needs.

40

Schedule (10%) – Proposal for completing the project in a timely manner, inclusive of the proposer’s ability to identify critical paths for the timely and competent completion of all work contemplated under the RFP.

10

Compliance with RFP (10%) – The ability of the proposer to comply with all instructions set forth under this RFP as well as the proposer’s ability to agree to all of the terms and conditions of the attached PSA without modification, particularly as relates to indemnification, insurance requirements and standards of care.

10

Subtotal

85

Cost (15%) – The proposed compensation structure (inclusive of hourly rates of compensation, pass through costs and subconsultant costs) for the performance of Tasks 1 through 8, inclusive of its proposed not-to -exceed sum.  The proposers proposed strategy for containing costs incurred by City while still meeting the objectives and standards set forth under the RFP. (NOTE: THIS WILL BE COVERED IN CLASS)

15

Total

100