HRPP

Criteria Ratings Points

Content, Key Components & Major Point Support

123 to >115.0 pts

Advanced

Submission demonstrates proper analysis of all main points of the selected HR topics. Paper includes a comprehensive analysis of the selected HR topics and makes highly relevant application of the course principles. Paper includes content that is clearly relevant in support of the selected policies, as well as integration of biblical principles relevant to the content of the paper. Comprehensive context is provided with the selected biblical principles to ensure relevancy.

115 to >24.0 pts

Proficient

Submission demonstrates proper analysis of some of the main points of the selected HR topics. Paper includes a notable attempt at basic analysis of the selected HR topics and makes basically relevant application of the course principles Paper includes content that shows random relevance in support of the selected policies, as well as integration of biblical principles relevant to the content of the paper. A notable attempt at basic context is provided with the selected biblical principles to ensure relevancy. Paper uses 5-6 scholarly references published within the last 5 years, in addition to the textbook and relevant biblical integration

24 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Submission does not demonstrate proper analysis of the main points of the selected HR topics. Paper includes an incomplete analysis of the selected HR topics and application of course principles is not appropriate or relevant to the content of the paper Paper does not include integration of biblical principles relevant to the content of the paper or limited to no context is provided with the selected biblical principles to ensure relevancy. Paper uses fewer than 5 scholarly references published within the last 5 years, in addition to the textbook and relevant biblical integration.

0 pts

Not Present

123 pts

Human Resource Policy Project Grading Rubric | BUSI642_B05_202240

Criteria Ratings Points

Grammar and Spelling, Current APA Formatting

52 to >48.0 pts

Advanced

Minimum of 1,750 words of content, which includes all elements identified in the project outline instructions, is present. Paper uses 10 or more scholarly references published within the last 5 years, in addition the textbook and relevant biblical integration. Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow. Layout is logical and maintains the flow of thought throughout the paper. Presentation of content is logical and flows from one point to the next. References are cited using current APA style and formatting guidelines. Evidence is properly cited with 0–2 errors to support main points. Additional aspects of current APA formatting, such as title page, abstract, headings, and references page, contain 0–3 errors. Proper spelling and grammar are used.

48 to >12.0 pts

Proficient

There is 1650-1700 words of content, which includes most of the elements identified in the project outline, is present. Structure of the paper is mostly clear but is not always easy to follow. Content shows sporadic connectivity, flow, and organization. Presentation of content progresses logically in places. References are cited using current APA style and formatting guidelines. Evidence is properly cited with no more than 5-6 errors to support main points. Additional aspects of current APA formatting, such as title page, abstract, headings, and references page, contain 7-8 errors. Proper spelling and grammar are used in most instances.

12 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There is less than 1650 words of content. Organization and structure detract from the message of the paper. Content is disjointed and lacks implied transition of thoughts or content. References are not cited using current APA style and formatting guidelines. Evidence is not properly cited to support main points. Additional aspects of current APA formatting, such as title page, abstract, headings, and references page, contain 9 or more errors. Spelling and grammar are below average and need attention.

0 pts

Not Present

52 pts

Total Points: 175

Human Resource Policy Project Grading Rubric | BUSI642_B05_202240