mini Review article (500 words)

1Department of Animal Biology-Anthropology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 2Department of Biological Sciences, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan. 3Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, and Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia. 4Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

*Correspondence to: Pedro Moral, Biodiversity Research Institute, Department of Animal Biology-Anthropology, University of Barcelona, Avenida Diagonal no. 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: [email protected].

KEY WORDS: alu insertion polymorphisms, jordan, bedouins, population genetics.

Human Biology, Spring 2014, v. 86, no. 2, pp. 131–138. Copyright © 2014 Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201

Human Diversity in Jordan: Polymorphic Alu Insertions in General Jordanian and Bedouin Groups

Daniela Zanetti,1 May Sadiq,2 Robert Carreras-Torres,1 Omar Khabour,3 Almuthanna Alkaraki,2 Esther Esteban,1 Marc Via,4 and Pedro Moral 1*

abstract

Jordan, located in the Levant region, is an area crucial for the investigation of human migration between Africa and Eurasia. However, the genetic history of Jordanians has yet to be clarified, including the origin of the Bedouins today resident in Jordan. Here, we provide new genetic data on autosomal independent markers in two Jordanian population samples (Bedouins and the general population) to begin to examine the genetic diversity inside this country and to provide new information about the genetic position of these populations in the context of the Mediterranean and Middle East area. The markers analyzed were 18 Alu polymorphic insertions characterized by their identity by descent, known ancestral state (lack of insertion), and apparent selective neutrality. The results indicate significant genetic diffferences between Bedouins and general Jordanians (p = 0.038). Whereas Bedouins show a close genetic proximity to North Africans, general Jordanians appear genetically more similar to other Middle East populations. In general, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that Bedouins had an important role in the peopling of Jordan and constitute the original substrate of the current population. However, migration into Jordan in recent years likely has contributed to the diversity among current Jordanian population groups.

The State of Jordan emerged in 1946 as the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan when Britain and France divided the Middle East after World War II. Since 1948 it has offficially been known as the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Jor- dan is a predominantly Arab nation, whose capital and largest city is Amman. It is located on the East Bank of the Jordan River and the Dead Sea and borders Palestine and Israel states to the west, Syria to the north, Saudi Arabia to the south and east, and Iraq to the northeast.

Because of its position in the Levant region, Jordan represents one of the major pathways for human movement. Since antiquity, traders tra- versed this area carrying products from the lands of the Indian Ocean basin to Syria, to be distributed from there to other parts of the Mediterranean world. Jordan was a crossroads for people from all over what is known today as the Middle East. Because of its strategic position connecting Asia, Africa, and Europe in the ancient world,  Jordan was a major transit zone and thus an object of

132 ■ Zanetti et al.

contention among the rival empires of  ancient Persians,  Macedonian Greeks, and many others (Salibi 1998).

Current inhabitants of Jordan are mostly Arab descendants of Transjordan or Palestine, and Bed- ouins, part of a predominantly desert-dwelling Arabian ethnic group traditionally divided into tribes. Historically, the inhabitants of this desert, which spreads northward into Syria, eastward into Iraq, and southward into Saudi Arabia, were Bedouin pastoralists (Salibi 1998). Today around 98% of the 7.9 million Jordanians are of Arab origin, along with other small minorities such as Circassians (1%) and Armenians (1%). Culturally, the offficial language is Arabic; in terms of religion, over 92% of the people are Sunni Muslims, around 6% are Christians (mostly Greek Orthodox, but some Greek and Roman Catholics, Syrian Ortho- dox, Coptic Orthodox, Armenian Orthodox, and Protestant denominations), and the remaining 2% are Shia Muslim and Druze populations (Central Intelligence Agency 2013–2014).

Historically, the term “Bedouin” has denoted both a nomadic way of life and a group identity. Bedouins were the original settlers in the Middle East. From the Arabian Peninsula, their original home, they spread out and now live in desert regions of all the countries between the Arabian Gulf and the Atlantic. The Arab conquest of North Africa in the seventh century AD caused a wide dispersion, such that today the Arab culture is extended over North Africa and beyond.

The availability of historical and ethnical in- formation about Jordanian peoples (Salibi 1998) contrasts with the lack of information about the genetic background of these groups. As far as we know, previous genetic information about Jordanian populations includes two studies on uniparental markers analyzed in Bedouins and general Jordanians (Flores et al. 2005; González et al. 2008) and a survey of a reduced number of Alu insertions, fewer than those analyzed in this study, in a sample of the general Jordanian population (Bahri et al. 2011). Variation in the uniparental markers (Y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA) underlines the genetic outlier position of Bedouins, whereas general Jordanians are relatively close to the neighboring Middle East groups.

To provide new insight from autosomal gene variation about the distinctiveness of Bedouins

suggested by uniparental markers, this study geno- typed 18 autosomal Alu insertions in two diffferent Jordanian samples: one of individuals of Bedouin origin and the other of considered as representative of the general Jordanian population. The main objective was to test whether autosomal markers confirm the previous population diffferentiation within Jordan revealed by uniparental markers. The secondary objectives were to determine the degree of genetic heterogeneity in Jordan, the genetic position of Bedouins and general Jordanians in the general context of the Mediterranean and the Middle East areas, and to provide new data about the potential influence of Bedouins, as representa- tives of Arab origins, in North Africa.

In this study 18 Alu insertion markers were se- lected because they are a useful tool for population studies on the basis of their identity by descent, known ancestral state, and selective neutrality (Cordaux et al. 2006; Cordaux and Batzer 2009). The potential usefulness of specific Alu loci as ancestry-informative markers has been explored to detect diffferences between populations and to estimate biogeographical ancestry (Luizon et al. 2007). Polymorphic Alu insertions have also been used in several studies tackling many historical and demographical questions (González-Pérez et al. 2010; Terreros et al. 2009).

Materials and Methods

Samples and Markers A total of 96 blood samples from healthy unrelated individuals of both sexes, collected from diffferent regions of the north, center, and south of Jordan, were classified into two groups: Bedouins (n = 43) and general Jordanians (n = 53). Collection, classification, and DNA isolation of all samples were carried out by researchers at Yarmouk Uni- versity. All participants were selected because their relatives were born in Jordan for at least three gen- erations. The general Jordanian group was mostly sampled in Jordanian cities, such as Amman and Irbid. The Bedouin samples were collected from the Badia desert in collaboration with the Jordan Badia Research and Development Center. These samples were classified according to the towns or village in which the subject and the subject’s parents and grandparents were born, as well as

Polymorphic Alu Insertions in Jordanian and Bedouin Groups ■ 133

the last names of the families and the tribes they belong to. All subjects signed an informed consent, and the study was approved by the ethical commit- tees of the University of Barcelona and Yarmouk University. The protocols and procedures used in this research were in compliance with the Declara- tion of Helsinki.

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood cells using a Blood DNA Midi Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA) according to the manufacturer’s procedure. Eighteen human-specific Alu polymor- phic elements (A25, ACE, APOA1, B65, CD4, D1, DM, FXIIIB, HS2.43, HS4.32, HS4.69, PV92, Sb19.12, Sb19.3, TPA25, Ya5NBC221, Yb8NBC120, and Yb- 8NBC125) located on 10 diffferent chromosomes (Chr 1, 3, 8, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19, 21, and 22) were typed by PCR amplification and electrophoretic analysis. Primers and amplification conditions have been previously described (Batzer and Deininger 1991; González-Pérez et al. 2010; Stoneking et al. 1997). Positive and negative controls for the polymor- phisms examined were included in all PCR runs.

Statistical Analyses Standard human population genetic parameters were obtained. Allele frequencies were estimated by direct counting. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was assessed by an exact test based on the Markov chain method (Guo and Thompson 1992) using Ge- nepop, version 4.2 (Rousset 2008). Heterozygosity values by locus and population according to Nei’s

formula (Saitou and Nei 1987) were calculated using Genetix version 4.05 (Belkhir et al. 1996–2004). Dif- ferences in allele frequency distribution between the two Jordanian samples and, in general, between all pairs of populations were assessed by an exact test based on Fisher’s exact probability test using the Genepop software.

Genetic distances (Reynolds’s distance) and hi- erarchical analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) were estimated using Phylip, version 3.69 (Tuimala 2006), and Arlequin, version 3.5 (Excofffier et al. 2005). Genetic relationships among populations were assessed by a principal component (PC) plot using the FactoMineR package of R ( Josse 2008).

Comparisons with Published Data Sets To evaluate the genetic position of Bedouins and general Jordanians in the Mediterranean and the Middle East areas, two comparative analyses were carried out, based on population data available in the literature. The main analysis focused on the whole Mediterranean area using 18 polymorphic Alu insertions in 16 populations, as indicated in Figure 1. These populations comprised three Span- ish regions (southern Spain: Andalusia; northern Spain: Asturias; central Spain: Sierra de Gredos), southern France (Toulouse), Turkey (Anatolia Peninsula), Greece (Attica region), five Mediter- ranean islands (Sardinia, Corsica, Sicily, Crete, and Minorca), and five Berber groups from Morocco, Algeria, and Egypt. The Moroccan samples came

FIGURE 1. Geographic location of the populations analyzed in the study: populations analyzed using 18 Alu (circles) and populations analyzed using the only eight Alu insertion polymorphisms available in the literature (crosses). 1: Amizmiz Berbers (AMBE), 2: Middle Atlas Berbers (MABE), 3: Northeast Moroccan Berbers (NEBE), 4: Southern Spain, 5: Central Spain, 6: Northern Spain, 7: France, 8: Corsica, 9: Sicily, 10: Greece, 11: Crete, 12: Turkey, 13: Syria, 14: Iran, 15: United Arab Emirates, 16: Baharain, 17: Cyprus, 18: Siwa Berbers (Siwa), 19: Mzab Berbers (Mzab), 20: Sardinia, 21: Menorca.

134 ■ Zanetti et al.

from High Atlas (Amizmiz Berbers), Middle Atlas (Berbers from the Khenifra region), and northeast Moroccan Berbers (Bouhria area). Other Berber samples were Mzab from Algeria and Siwi from the Siwa Oasis in Egypt (González-Pérez et al. 2007, 2010).

To obtain a geographically more comprehensive data set in the Middle East, a second comparative analysis adding samples from Iran, Cyprus, United Arab Emirates, Syria, and Bahrain was performed. This analysis was based on data from only eight Alu markers available in the literature (Bahri et al. 2013; González-Pérez et al. 2010; Romualdi et al. 2002; Stoneking et al. 1997).

Results

Alu insertion frequencies and gene diversities in Bedouins and general Jordanians are shown in Table 1. The highest insertion frequencies corre- spond to the Ya5NBC221 locus in Bedouins (0.941) and to the APOA1 locus in general Jordanians

(0.950); the lowest frequency values are found in the HS2.43 locus (0 in Bedouins and 0.08 in general Jordanians). As expected, the lowest gene diversity values correspond to loci showing ex- treme allele frequencies: Ya5NBC221 (H = 0.112) in Bedouins, APOA1 (H = 0.096) in general Jordanians, and HS2.43 in both Bedouins (H = 0) and general Jordanians (H = 0.149). The highest diversity values corresponding to loci with frequencies close to 0.5 were B65 and TPA25 (H = 0.506) in Bedouins and TPA25 (H = 0.500) in general Jordanians.

The test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, after Bonferroni correction, indicates significant deviations only for D1 (p = 0.0000) and FXIIIB (p = 0.0000) in general Jordanians. Chance is the most likely explanation for this departure because there is no particular reason to expect a Hardy-Weinberg deviation for these markers, and the deviations are not shared by the two population samples.

Comparison of the two Jordanian samples shows that the average gene diversity in general Jordanians (0.366 ± 0.142) is only slightly higher than in Bedouins (0.349 ± 0.146). In general,

Table 1. Alu Insertion Frequencies, Gene Diversities, and p-Values of Hardy-Weinberg (H-W) Equilibrium in Bedouins and General Jordanians

Locus Bedouin General_Jordan Frequency Range N Insertion Heterozygosity H-W N Insertion Heterozygosity H-W High Low

DM 25 0.640 0.470 0.187 37 0.405 0.489 0.048 Siwa (0.356) Sicily (0.674)

HS4.69 42 0.452 0.501 0.530 50 0.440 0.498 0.011 Mzab (0.287) Bedouin (0.452)

HS4.32 38 0.776 0.352 0.059 51 0.824 0.294 0.638 Central Spain (0.493) General_Jordan (0.824)

Ya5NBC221 34 0.941 0.112 1.000 41 0.939 0.116 0.121 Southern Spain (0.725) Northern Spain (0.978)

Sb19.3 42 0.750 0.380 1.000 53 0.755 0.374 0.259 AMBE (0.613) Sardinia (0.945)

HS2.43 38 0.000 0.000 <0.001 50 0.080 0.149 0.261 Bedouin (0) Sardinia (0.171)

Sb19.12 43 0.267 0.396 0.133 53 0.274 0.401 1.000 Mzab (0.135) Central Spain (0.4)

B65 40 0.500 0.506 0.536 48 0.563 0.497 0.140 Siwa (0.150) Crete (0.647)

Yb8NBC120 33 0.394 0.485 0.270 43 0.430 0.496 1.000 Siwa (0.023) AMBE (0.569)

YbNBC125 41 0.134 0.235 1.000 53 0.226 0.354 0.048 Siwa (0.065) General Jordan (0.226)

PV92 27 0.241 0.373 0.613 35 0.143 0.248 0.526 Sicily (0.079) MABE (0.368)

D1 39 0.385 0.479 0.005 51 0.412 0.489 <0.001 United Arab Emirates (0.08) Sicily (0.474)

FXIIIB 43 0.302 0.427 1.000 52 0.298 0.423 t0.001 Iran (0.214) Turkey (0.584)

A25 43 0.105 0.190 0.372 53 0.132 0.231 0.575 Syria (0) Central Spain (0.175)

CD4 37 0.797 0.328 0.616 43 0.663 0.452 0.041 Crete (0.593) Bedouin (0.797)

TPA25 38 0.487 0.506 0.204 49 0.551 0.500 0.251 Siwa (0.317) NEBE (0.661)

APOA1 38 0.868 0.232 0.098 50 0.950 0.096 0.100 Siwa (0.84) France (0.981)

ACE 42 0.202 0.327 0.657 53 0.387 0.479 0.772 Bedouin (0.202) Central Spain (0.467

Average heterozygosity 0.349±0.146 0.366±0.142

Abbreviations: N: number of chromosomes; AMBE: Amizmiz Berbers, MABE: Middle Atlas Berbers, NEBE: Northeast Moroccan Berbers, MZAB: Mzab Berbers. Variation ranges are given according to data

from reviewed literature for populations represented in Figure 1.

the Jordanian frequencies and gene diversities show values within the variation range of other Mediterranean populations. Extreme values were found only for HS2.43 and ACE in Bedou- ins, corresponding to the lowest frequencies in the literature revised, and for HS4.69 and CD4 in Bedouins and HS4.32 and Yb8NBC125 in general Jordanians, which are the highest values in the literature revised. Allele frequency comparisons show significant diffferences across all 18 loci (p = 0.038; 36 df ) between Bedouins and general Jordanians. Locus-by-locus comparisons indicate significant diffferences for DM (p = 0.015), HS2.43 (p = 0.01), and ACE (p = 0.005) markers.

Concerning population relationships, the PC analysis based on the whole set of Alu insertion polymorphisms in 16 populations indicates that the two first axes account for 49.31% of the total genetic variance (Figure 2). The first axis (33.76% of the total variance) clusters Bedouins along with North African samples with a certain separation from the rest. Within this group, the Siwa Oasis sample appears in the most distant position. The second component underlines the separation of the Western Mediterranean samples (central Spain, France, north of Spain, Corsica, and Sicily) from Eastern Mediterranean groups (Greece, Tur- key, Crete) and general Jordan. When the analysis was repeated to remove the efffect of the Siwa Oasis

sample (data not shown), the observed pattern was substantially the same. Population relationships within Jordan indicate that the Bedouins, closer to North Africans, show an intermediate position between these populations and Eastern Mediter- raneans, whereas general Jordanians cluster with Eastern Mediterranean populations. Results from both genetic distance analysis and AMOVA sup- port the distribution revealed by the PC analysis. Thus, the average Reynolds genetic distance of Bedouins to the remaining populations (31 × 10–3) is of the same order of magnitude as the average distance among all the populations (32 × 10–3), whereas the distance of general Jordanians to Middle Eastern populations (23 × 10–3) is lower than that corresponding to Bedouins (28 × 10–3; Table 2).

The hierarchical analysis of the allele fre- quency variance, classifying the populations into two groups (North Africa plus Bedouins, and all others) indicates a significant variation between the two groups, as plotted along the first PC axes (FST = 3.4%, p < 0.001; FCT = 1.6%, p ≤ 0.001; FSC = 1.8%, p < 0.001). Likewise, the population distribu- tion associated with the second PC component is also supported by the AMOVA results. In this case, the genetic variance between the three population groups formed by North Africa plus Bedouins, Middle East plus general Jordanians, and

FIGURE 2. PC plot of 16 populations from the Mediterranean area based on the variation of 18 Alu insertion polymorphisms.

Polymorphic Alu Insertions in Jordanian and Bedouin Groups ■ 135

136 ■ Zanetti et al.

Western Mediterranean also indicates statistically significant variation (FST = 3%, p < 0.001; FCT = 1.2%, p ≤ 0.001; FSC = 1.8%, p < 0.001).

A second comparison, partial because it is based on the variation of only eight Alu markers but including a wider number of populations (21; PC analysis population plot not shown) also separates Bedouins from general Jordanians. However, in this case, the relative position of the two Jordanian samples versus other populations shows some diffferences compared with results of the previous analysis. For instance, the general Jordanian group tends to be closer to Western Mediterranean than to Middle East populations.

Discussion

This study provides the first comparative genetic analysis between two Jordanian ethnic groups selected according to strict and reliable criteria, Bedouins and general Jordanians, by analyzing 18 autosomal Alu insertion polymorphisms. In gen- eral, Jordanian allele frequencies and gene diversity estimates show intermediate values within the vari- ation range of other Mediterranean populations.

Compared with previous data, Alu frequencies in general Jordanians are substantially similar to those previously reported for a partial subset of Alu markers (10 of the 18) in a Jordanian sample (Bahri et al. 2011), except for two Alu markers: D1 (p = 0.02) and HS4.32 (p = 0.006). These few diffferences could be related to the potentially diverse origin of the individuals sampled in each case.

Concerning diffferentiation within Jordan, this study indicates a significant diffference between Bedouins and urban inhabitants of Jordan (p = 0.038). Of the 18 autosomal insertion markers, three are statistically diffferent: DM (p = 0.015), HS2.43 (p = 0.01), and ACE (p = 0.005). Consider- ing the relatively small sample size, the genetic diffferences point to a clear separation between these two groups. This could be related to the fact that in recent times urban areas have been subject to several external influences but Bedouins have conserved their own genetic background because of their nomadic and isolated lifestyle. In fact, among all the considered populations in the com- parative analyses, Bedouins appear to be the most diverse group, in contrast to general Jordanians, who cluster with other Middle Eastern groups. However, we should not ignore the fact that the

Table 2. Reynolds’s Genetic Distances Estimated among All 18 Populations using 18 Alu Insertion Markers

Bedouin GJ Greece Crete Turkey Asturias C_Spain Andalusia Balearic_I France Corsica Sardinia Sicily AMBE MABE NEBE MZAB Siwa

Bedouin —

GJ 0.023 —

Greece 0.028 0.023 —

Crete 0.028 0.019 0.008 —

Turkey 0.027 0.028 0.005 0.009 —

Asturias 0.029 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.019 —

C_Spain 0.039 0.034 0.024 0.029 0.035 0.017 —

Andalusia 0.034 0.019 0.027 0.024 0.023 0.016 0.030 —

Balearic_I 0.026 0.020 0.012 0.007 0.012 0.015 0.026 0.019 —

France 0.020 0.018 0.011 0.014 0.014 0.009 0.016 0.021 0.016 —

Corsica 0.028 0.026 0.008 0.012 0.011 0.016 0.018 0.024 0.008 0.011 —

Sardinia 0.029 0.030 0.026 0.022 0.028 0.027 0.034 0.034 0.025 0.017 0.020 —

Sicily 0.023 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.022 0.015 0.023 0.028 0.016 0.013 0.010 0.033 —

AMBE 0.027 0.017 0.039 0.034 0.041 0.030 0.048 0.025 0.031 0.039 0.043 0.052 0.035 —

MABE 0.028 0.020 0.025 0.023 0.026 0.022 0.033 0.019 0.027 0.028 0.036 0.033 0.040 0.018 —

NEBE 0.024 0.022 0.024 0.023 0.024 0.023 0.042 0.023 0.022 0.031 0.030 0.038 0.036 0.017 0.012 —

MZAB 0.034 0.036 0.045 0.037 0.042 0.042 0.050 0.033 0.036 0.045 0.049 0.035 0.059 0.027 0.010 0.020 —

Siwa 0.076 0.085 0.105 0.101 0.102 0.087 0.084 0.077 0.091 0.091 0.094 0.075 0.100 0.102 0.065 0.083 0.057 —

Abbreviations: AMBE: Amizmiz Berbers, GJ, general Jordanians, MABE: Middle Atlas Berbers, NEBE: Northeast Moroccan Berbers, MZAB: Mzab Berbers.

markers analyzed (number and/or low mutation rate) may be not powerful enough to uncover relatively recent demographic events. In this way, the small inconsistencies in the relative genetic position of the two Jordanian samples with respect to other populations found in the two analyses using diffferent numbers of Alu loci (18 vs. 8) most likely reflect the role of chance when few mark- ers are used to characterize human populations. In any case, the genetic diffferentiation observed between Bedouin and general Jordanians using 18 Alu insertions polymorphisms is consistent with the diffferentiation reported from the mitochon- drial DNA and Y-chromosome uniparental loci in two recent studies (Flores et al. 2005; González et al. 2008). Assuming that Bedouins represent the original substrate of current-day Jordanians, the diffferentiation found between them and the general Jordanian group could be explained by a higher Mediterranean influence in the general population due to Jordan’s position as a crossroads since ancient times and/or the recent contribution of immigrants in the last half of the twentieth century.

In a Mediterranean context, Bedouins seem to be closer to North African groups, whereas general Jordanians tend to group with North Mediterra- neans, especially with the easternmost popula- tions. Greater genetic proximity of Bedouins and North Africans could be explained by the impact of Arabic expansion into North Africa in the seventh century. However, the outlier position of the Egyp- tian sample from Siwa, also acknowledged in other studies (Athanasiadis et al. 2007), together with the significant lack of Alu data in most points of North Africa, does not allow definite conclusions.

In summary, this Alu population analysis re- inforces the genetic distinctiveness of Bedouins, suggesting that they had an important role in the peopling of Jordan and probably constitute the original substrate of this population. Their relative genetic proximity to North African groups supports the idea that they share the genetic background of the populations that spread the Arab culture into North Africa. The genetic diffferentiation found between the two groups of current Jordanian population could be attributed to some extent to a relatively recent contribution of immigrants coming from neighboring areas. However, this conclusion needs to be confirmed with additional

markers to avoid random efffects associated with the use of a low number of markers.

acknowledgments

We thank all participants who provided blood samples and Mr. Nawras Al-Jazi from Badia Research Program Jordan for facilitating sample collection in the remote southern regions of Jordan. This work was supported by Programa de Coop- eración Interuniversitaria e Investigación Científica grants A/023616/09 and A/030982/10 from the Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo, and by the CGL-2011-27866 project to the participant Yarmouk and Barcelona Universities. D.Z. was supported by Master & Back grant AF-DR-A2011B-48666-25399/2011.

Received 21 January 2014; revision accepted for publication 3 June 2014.

literature cited

Athanasiadis, G., E. Esteban, M. Via et al. 2007. The X chro- mosome Alu insertions as a tool for human population genetics: Data from European and African human groups. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 15:578–583.

Bahri, R., A. Ben Halima, I. Ayadi et al. 2013. Genetic position of Bahrain natives among wider Middle East popula- tions according to Alu insertion polymorphisms. Ann. Hum. Biol. 40:35–40.

Bahri, R., W. El Moncer, K. Al-Batayneh et al. 2011. Genetic diffferentiation and origin of the Jordanian population: An analysis of Alu insertion polymorphisms. Genet. Test Mol. Biomarkers 16:324–329.

Batzer, M. A., and P. L. Deininger. 1991. A human-specific subfamily of Alu sequences. Genomics 9:481–487.

Belkhir, K., P. Borsa, L. Chikhi et al. 1996–2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Montpellier, France: Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II.

Central Intelligence Agency. 2013–2014. Middle East: Jordan. In The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/ publications/the-world-factbook/geos/jo.html.

Cordaux, R., and M. A. Batzer. 2009. The impact of ret- rotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10:691–703.

Cordaux, R., J. Lee, L. Dinoso et al. 2006. Recently integrated Alu retrotransposons are essentially neutral residents of the human genome. Gene. 373:138–144

Excofffier, L., G. Laval, and S. Schneider. 2005. Arlequin ver.

Polymorphic Alu Insertions in Jordanian and Bedouin Groups ■ 137

138 ■ Zanetti et al.

3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online 1:47–50.

Flores, C., N. Maca-Meyer, J. Larruga et al. 2005. Isolates in a corridor of migrations: A high-resolution analysis of Y-chromosome variation in Jordan. J. Hum. Genet. 50:435–441.

González, A. M., N. Karadsheh, N. Maca-Meyer et al. 2008. Mitochondrial DNA variation in Jordanians and their genetic relationship to other Middle East populations. Ann. Hum. Biol. 35:212–231.

González-Pérez, E., E. Esteban, M. Via et al. 2010. Popula- tion relationships in the Mediterranean revealed by autosomal genetic data (Alu and Alu/STR compound systems). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 141:430–439.

González-Pérez, E., P. Moral, M. Via et al. 2007. The ins and outs of population relationships in west-Mediterranean islands: Data from autosomal Alu polymorphisms and Alu/STR compound systems. J. Hum. Genet. 52:999–1,010.

Guo, S. W., and E. A. Thompson. 1992. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361–372.

Josse, J. 2008. FactoMineR : An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 25:1–18.

Luizon, M. R., C. T. Mendes-Junior, S. F. De Oliveira et al.

2007. Ancestry informative markers in Amerindians from Brazilian Amazon. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 20:86–90.

Romualdi, C., D. Balding, I. S. Nasidze et al. 2002. Patterns of human diversity, within and among continents, inferred from biallelic DNA polymorphisms. Genome Res. 12:602–612.

Rousset, F. 2008. Genepop’007: A complete re-implementa- tion of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8:103–106.

Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–425.

Salibi, K. S. 1998. The Modern History of Jordan. London: I. B. Tauris.

Stoneking, M., J. J. Fontius, S. L. Cliffford et al. 1997. Alu insertion polymorphisms and human evolution: Evi- dence for a larger population size in Africa. Gen. Res. 7:1,061–1,071.

Terreros, M. C., M. A. Alfonso-Sanchez, G. E. Novick et al. 2009. Insights on human evolution: An analysis of Alu insertion polymorphisms. J. Hum. Genet. 54:603–611.

Tuimala, J. 2006. A Primer to Phylogenetic Analysis using the PHYLIP Package. Espoo, Finland: CSC—Scientific Computing.

Copyright of Human Biology is the property of Wayne State University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.