Nyanya I have new homework for you. Are you available? There are three assignments. Please respond.

9/9/2017 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/571/1134/Week10­1134/Week 10 Assignment 4 Grading Rubric.html

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/571/1134/Week10­1134/Week%2010%20Assignment%204%20Grading%20Rubric.html 1/2

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 320 Assignment 4: Asset Misappropriation and Corporate Governance

Criteria Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70­79% C

Proficient

80­89% B

Exemplary

90­100% A 1. Based on your research, evaluate the type of asset misappropriations that occurred at the organization, and assess the factors that contributed to the misappropriation. Give your opinion on whether poor management or lack of management played a role in the asset misappropriation.   Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the type of asset misappropriations that occurred at the organization, and assessed the factors that contributed to the misappropriation, based on your research. Did not submit or incompletely gave your opinion on whether poor management or lack of management played a role in the asset misappropriation. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

Partially evaluated the type of asset misappropriations that occurred at the organization, and assessed the factors that contributed to the misappropriation, based on your research. Partially gave your opinion on whether poor management or lack of management played a role in the asset misappropriation. Partially provided support for your rationale.

Satisfactorily evaluated the type of asset misappropriations that occurred at the organization, and assessed the factors that contributed to the misappropriation, based on your research. Satisfactorily gave your opinion on whether poor management or lack of management played a role in the asset misappropriation. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

Thoroughly evaluated the type of asset misappropriations that occurred at the organization, and assessed the factors that contributed to the misappropriation, based on your research. Thoroughly gave your opinion on whether poor management or lack of management played a role in the asset misappropriation. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

2. Evaluate the legal mechanisms that could have been used to recover assets through the civil and criminal justice systems. Assess whether the civil and criminal justice systems did an effective job in recovering the organization’s assets.  Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the legal mechanisms that could have been used to recover assets through the civil and criminal justice systems. Did not submit or incompletely assessed whether the civil and criminal justice systems did an effective job in recovering the organization’s assets. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

Partially evaluated the legal mechanisms that could have been used to recover assets through the civil and criminal justice systems. Partially assessed whether the civil and criminal justice systems did an effective job in recovering the organization’s assets. Partially provided support for your rationale.

Satisfactorily evaluated the legal mechanisms that could have been used to recover assets through the civil and criminal justice systems. Satisfactorily assessed whether the civil and criminal justice systems did an effective job in recovering the organization’s assets. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

Thoroughly evaluated the legal mechanisms that could have been used to recover assets through the civil and criminal justice systems. Thoroughly assessed whether the civil and criminal justice systems did an effective job in recovering the organization’s assets. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

3. Assess management’s responsibility to share information related to the breach with various stakeholder groups, indicating what should be shared and how. Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely assessed management’s responsibility to share information related to the breach with various stakeholder groups, indicating what should be shared and how. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

Partially assessed management’s responsibility to share information related to the breach with various stakeholder groups, indicating what should be shared and how. Partially provided support for your rationale.

Satisfactorily assessed management’s responsibility to share information related to the breach with various stakeholder groups, indicating what should be shared and how. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

Thoroughly assessed management’s responsibility to share information related to the breach with various stakeholder groups, indicating what should be shared and how. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

4. Review AICPA Statements on Auditing Standard (SAS) No. 99, “Risk Factors Relating to Misstatements Arising from Misappropriation of Assets”, found within the text. Assess SAS 99 risk factors and discuss if the risk factors were

Did not submit or incompletely reviewed AICPA Statements on Auditing Standard (SAS) No. 99, “Risk Factors Relating to Misstatements Arising from Misappropriation of

Partially reviewed AICPA Statements on Auditing Standard (SAS) No. 99, “Risk Factors Relating to Misstatements Arising from Misappropriation of Assets”, found within the text. Partially assessed

Satisfactorily reviewed AICPA Statements on Auditing Standard (SAS) No. 99, “Risk Factors Relating to Misstatements Arising from Misappropriation of Assets”, found within the

Thoroughly reviewed AICPA Statements on Auditing Standard (SAS) No. 99, “Risk Factors Relating to Misstatements Arising from Misappropriation of Assets”, found within the

9/9/2017 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/571/1134/Week10­1134/Week 10 Assignment 4 Grading Rubric.html

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/571/1134/Week10­1134/Week%2010%20Assignment%204%20Grading%20Rubric.html 2/2

prevalent in the organization you researched. Give your opinion on whether or not organizations should implement a plan that reviews risk factors on a regular basis to determine if fraud has occurred. Explain why or why not.

Weight: 15%

Assets”, found within the text. Did not submit or incompletely assessed SAS 99 risk factors and did not submit or incompletely discussed if the risk factors were prevalent in the organization you researched. Did not submit or incompletely gave your opinion on whether or not organizations should implement a plan that reviews risk factors on a regular basis to determine if fraud has occurred. Did not submit or incompletely explained why or why not.

SAS 99 risk factors and partially discussed if the risk factors were prevalent in the organization you researched. Partially gave your opinion on whether or not organizations should implement a plan that reviews risk factors on a regular basis to determine if fraud has occurred.  Partially explained why or why not.

text. Satisfactorily assessed SAS 99 risk factors and satisfactorily discussed if the risk factors were prevalent in the organization you researched. Satisfactorily gave your opinion on whether or not organizations should implement a plan that reviews risk factors on a regular basis to determine if fraud has occurred.  Satisfactorily explained why or why not.

text. Thoroughly assessed SAS 99 risk factors and thoroughly discussed if the risk factors were prevalent in the organization you researched. Thoroughly gave your opinion on whether or not organizations should implement a plan that reviews risk factors on a regular basis to determine if fraud has occurred.  Thoroughly explained why or why not.

5. Review the corporate governance plan of the organization you researched, evaluate the effectiveness of the plan, and make suggestions for improvements to protect the stakeholders.  Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely reviewed the corporate governance plan of the organization you researched, evaluated the effectiveness of the plan, and did not submit or incompletely made suggestions for improvements to protect the stakeholders. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

Partially reviewed the corporate governance plan of the organization you researched, evaluated the effectiveness of the plan, and partially made suggestions for improvements to protect the stakeholders. Partially provided support for your rationale.

Satisfactorily reviewed the corporate governance plan of the organization you researched, evaluated the effectiveness of the plan, and satisfactorily made suggestions for improvements to protect the stakeholders. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

Thoroughly reviewed the corporate governance plan of the organization you researched, evaluated the effectiveness of the plan, and thoroughly made suggestions for improvements to protect the stakeholders. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

6. Recommend a fraud prevention plan for this organization. Determine what positive or negative consequences this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely recommended a fraud prevention plan for this organization. Did not submit or incompletely determined what positive or negative consequences this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization.

Partially recommended a fraud prevention plan for this organization. Partially determined what positive or negative consequences this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization.

Satisfactorily recommended a fraud prevention plan for this organization. Satisfactorily determined what positive or negative consequences this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization.

Thoroughly recommended a fraud prevention plan for this organization. Thoroughly determined what positive or negative consequences this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization.

7. 4 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5­6 errors present 3­4 errors present 0­2 errors present