Need Writing assistance
Law101
HSE400CaseStudyWeek3.docxHSE 400
Week 3 Case Study
Listed below are topics I would like for you to discuss. Refer to the textbook, and weekly materials, when researching the topics for this Discussion Forum. Put your writing into your own words, do not copy directly from the source. If you incorporate external resources be sure to cite them properly. Lastly, review how to paraphrase and quote resources before you begin posting.
· Rumsfeld v Padilla – Discuss the main argument before the US Supreme Court. Do you agree with the concurring opinions or the dissenting opinions? Did detaining Padilla violate any of his constitutional rights afforded to any other U.S. citizen? Did the President have the authority to hold Padilla?
APA Format, 500 words
See Rubric Below
Wk 3 & 6 Case Study Rubric
|
Criteria |
20 points |
26 points |
|
|
|
|
Substance of Brief |
2 components were addressed properly |
All 3 components of the brief were addressed properly |
|
|
|
|
Criteria |
16 points |
24 points |
|
|
|
|
Opinion Component |
Opinion points were apparent with some supporting details provided that demonstrated some critical thinking. Includes factual inferences that are not supported. Lacks a sophisticated tone, but is readable and understandable. |
Opinion points were well developed with substantial, relevant supporting details that demonstrated critical thinking. Includes facts that are important to the analysis and conclusion. The opinion is concise, and the reader has all necessary information. |
|
|
|
|
Criteria |
12 points |
14 Points |
|
|
|
|
APA Style: In-Text Citations and References |
APA style was used with some errors. Some in-text citations conform to APA style AND/OR some references are cited correctly AND/OR there is some accuracy between in-text citations and the references. |
APA style was mostly used accurately and consistently. Most or all in-text citations conform to APA style. Most or all references are cited correctly. There is accuracy between in-text citations and the references. |
|
|
|
|
Criteria |
12 points |
18 points |
|
|
|
|
Overall Mechanics / Professionalism |
Case study contained some APA, grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and/or punctuation errors, distracting from professionalism. (3 to 5 errors) |
Case study was written in a professional manner using APA guidelines and were mostly free of grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors. (Less than 3 errors) |
|
|
|
|
Criteria |
6 points |
8 points |
12 points |
14 points |
18 points |
|
Length |
Case Study was between 300-349 words |
Case Study was between 350-399 words |
Case Study was between 400- 449 words |
Case Study was between 450- 499 words |
Case Study was 500 words |
