power point

Guidelines for Group: Chapter Video & Power Point Case Presentation

1. Each group shall create both a YouTube video and power point presentation (with APA

citations and references) responding to the questions below for the assigned Group Chapter

Case study.

a. What are the ethics issues in this case?

b. What management mistakes were made in this case?

c. Who are the key stakeholders in this case?

d. What steps can be taken within this organization to remedy these mistakes?

a) Formatting: References can be on a separate slide/page. b) Submission: This group assignment must be submitted by the group spokesperson in the

appropriate assignment dropbox by assigned due date.

c) Each issue, question, paragraph and sentence with a statistic, number or direct quote is required to

contain at least one “External Authoritative Source”. Each response shall have at least 2

“External Authoritative Sources” used substantively in the material in proper APA Style for

citation and references.

d) “External Authoritative Sources” for purposes of this course shall mean: books, peer

reviewed journal articles, education and government sites as well as non-partisan national

or international organizations (such as WHO, UNICEF, UNAIDS etc) provided, the

foregoing source/material selected has in text citations and references to support statements

made therein. Newspapers including the Wall Street Journal, blogs regardless of source,

editorial, panel discussions and dot com sites are not considered authoritative for this course.

e) Each question must be repeated followed by your narrative answer including properly cited sources and the references used in the answer.

f) Required Sources: A source cannot be referenced unless it was cited in the narrative answer

g) Formatting: The textbook from which the case study was published and the course text book must be cited just like any other source. It is not permissible to write "In the text book... or In the case study…"

h) Formatting: Any direct quote in the narrative must include the page or paragraph number in the citation

i) Formatting: It is improper to place a citation/source at the end of a paragraph if material from the source appears before the last sentence in the paragraph.

j) Formatting: It is improper to place a citation in the middle of a sentence. One can lead with the source

in the sentence but cannot use a citation within parenthesis except at the end of the sentence.

k) Additional Guidance: I urge student to review the adobe connect session with FIU Libraries and Writing Center on APA Style formatting and contact them personally if more assistance is needed.

GRADING RUBRIC: 25 points

Excellent Average Poor

Content 7 4 1

Central issues are all

identified and used as basis

for ethical evaluation. All

relevant facts identified

appropriately. Who, what,

where, when, how and

why were all addressed, as

appropriate.

Central issues are

identified but not clearly

explained. Peripheral

issued not identified. Facts

identified, but some may

not be relevant to case or

may be slightly

misinterpreted.

Central ethical issues not

defined appropriately or

completely.

Misunderstanding of the

issues related to the case.

Recommendation 6 3 1

Solution and ethical

analysis is logical and

clearly presented at a level

that reflects extensive

reflection and insight.

Solution and ethical

analysis is logical and

clear, but does not show

great reflection or insight.

The analysis may be

superficial at some level.

Analysis was not carried

out sufficiently and is

fundamentally flawed.

Solution may be trivial or

illogical.

Identification of

Consequences 4 2 1

All critical consequence

are identified and

connected with actions.

More minor consequences

are also considered.

Relative weights of the

various consequences

explicitly articulated with

rational thought.

All critical consequences

are identified, but some

minor consequences are

missed. Consequences are

related to actions, but

relative weights are not

clearly articulated or

inappropriate.

Critical consequences of

actions are missing.

Actions are not connected

with consequences, but are

instead random and

illogical. Relative weights

of actions and

consequences are not

identified.

Presentation 4 2 1

Holds attention of entire

audience with the use of

direct eye contact, seldom

looking down at notes.

Speaks with fluctuation in

volume and inflection to

maintain audience interest

and emphasize key points.

Displays minimal eye

contact with audience,

while reading mostly from

the notes. Speaks in

uneven volume with little

or no inflection

Holds no eye contact with

audience, as entire report is

read from notes. Speaks in

low volume and/ or

monotonous tone, which

causes audience to

disengage

Writing 4 2 1

Paper is coherently

organized and the logic is

Paper is generally well

organized and most of the

Paper is poorly organized

and difficult to read – does

easy to follow. There are

no spelling or grammatical

errors and terminology is

clearly defined. Writing is

clear and concise and

persuasive

argument is easy to follow.

There are only a few minor

spelling or grammatical

errors, or terms are not

clearly defined. Writing is

mostly clear but may lack

conciseness.

not flow logically from one

part to another. There are

several spelling and/or

grammatical errors;

technical terms may not be

defined or are poorly

defined. Writing lacks

clarity and conciseness.

Posting and sharing completed work on third party websites:

As a student at Florida International University Health Services Administration (HSA) program,

you work hard to accomplish your educational goal/degree. Therefore, it is critical that you protect

the integrity of your work. The HSA department strongly discourages the posting and sharing of

your work including but not limited to, assignments, discussions, papers, quizzes and test answers.

This includes indirectly sharing your work by posting it to a third party website, learning platform

database such as Course Hero, StudyMode, or any other external database outside of the

blackboard course. If you share your original work to any of these third party sites it is an automatic

disqualification from any publication opportunities to medical or educational journals. The HSA

department prohibits use of material from any of the forgoing sites in student submissions. Turnitin

will identify such use as plagiarism and will result in a zero grade.

In addition, unless explicitly stated otherwise, all course materials are the property of FIU, faculty

and their respective copyright holders. The sharing or redistribution of any course materials to

third parties is strictly prohibited.

The above actions violate Florida International University’s Academic Integrity, the Student

Conduct policies and the Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences policies of

Academic Misconduct. Students who are found in violation of these policies will be dismissed

from the degree program and or University.