Case Study
Florida National University
HSA-4421 Legal Aspects and Legislations: Assignment Week 7
Case Study: Chapters 20, 21.
Objective: The students will complete a Case study assignments that give the opportunity to synthesize and apply the thoughts learned in this and previous coursework to examine a real-world scenario. This scenario will illustrate through example the practical importance and implications of various roles and functions of a Health Care Administrator. The investigative trainings will advance students’ understanding and ability to contemplate critically about the public relations process, and their problem-solving skills. As a result of this assignment, students will be better able to comprehend, scrutinize and assess respectable superiority and performance by all institutional employees.
ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%):
Students will critically measure the readings from Chapters 20, 21 in your textbook. This assignment is planned to help you examination, evaluation, and apply the readings and strategies to your Health Care organization, and its legal aspects. You need to read the PowerPoint assigned for week 7 and develop a 3-4 page paper reproducing your understanding and capability to apply the readings to your Health Care organization and finance. Each paper must be typewritten with 12-point font and double-spaced with standard margins. Follow APA style 7th edition format when referring to the selected articles and include a reference page.
|
EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: |
1. Introduction (25%) Provide a brief synopsis of the meaning (not a description) of each Chapter and articles you read, in your own words that will apply to the case study presented.
2. Your Critique (50%): Case Study
HELPING ADVOCACY GROUP SUPPORT THE TREATMENT NEEDS OF PATIENTS IN OUTLIER COUNTRIES
A rare disease patient advocacy group based in the US was receiving requests from patients in outlier countries who wanted to gain access to an EMA- and FDA-approved product not commercially available in their home countries. These patients had no other treatment options available to them and were at risk of experiencing worsening symptoms which could lead to emergency surgery. The advocacy group wanted to help these patients but did not know how to get the product into these countries where it is not registered.
The advocacy group partnered with WEP Clinical to benefit from our experience making product available to patients in neglected or hard to reach areas on an unlicensed basis. In this instance, we were able to source the product from a local wholesaler at a relatively inexpensive cost and hold it at our UK warehouse facility. We then worked directly with the patients and their physicians to understand and fulfil the requirements for unlicensed medicines import into their individual home countries. Once all the paperwork was in place, our strategic partnerships with leading logistics and courier companies allowed us to deliver the product to the patients’ countries, clear it through customs, and transport it on to the treating physicians.
CASE STUDY CHALLENGE
1. Describe the patient advocacy procedure. Are you agree with it, would you find and propose a different solution? Explain it.
2. Describe the different employee responsibilities and how you ca apply them to the case study.
3. Conclusion (15%)
Briefly summarize your thoughts & conclusion to your critique of the case study and provide a possible outcome for the Health Care Center. How did these articles and Chapters influence your opinions about Legal aspects?
Evaluation will be based on how clearly you respond to the above, in particular:
a) The clarity with which you critique the case study;
b) The depth, scope, and organization of your paper; and,
c) Your conclusions, including a description of the impact of these Case study on any Health Care Setting.
ASSIGNMENT DUE DATE:
The assignment is to be electronically posted in the Assignments Link on Blackboard no later than noon on Sunday, October 18, 2020.
|
Assignments Guidelines |
1 Points |
10% |
|
Introduction |
2.5 Points |
25% |
|
Your Case Study Critique: Challenges |
5 Points |
50% |
|
Conclusion |
1.5 Points |
15% |
|
Total |
11 points |
100% |
ASSIGNMENT GRADING SYSTEM
|
A |
90% - 100% |
|
B+ |
85% - 89% |
|
B |
80% - 84% |
|
C+ |
75% - 79% |
|
C |
70% - 74% |
|
D |
60% – 69% |
|
F |
50% - 59% Or less. |
Dr. Gisela Llamas