|
The paper idea
|
· According to the requirements
|
· According to the requirements
|
· Not directly related to the requirements
|
· Not related to the requirement
|
The student did not submit any work or totally inadequate in all aspects
|
|
Structure
• Organization
• Flow of thought
• Transitions
• Format
|
· Paper is logically organized
· Easily followed
· Effective, smooth, and logical transitions
· Professional format
· Information/articles well synthesized
|
· Paper has a clear organizational structure with some digressions, ambiguities or irrelevances
· Easily followed
· Basic transitions
· Structured format
· Information fairly well synthesized
|
· There is some level of organization though digressions, ambiguities, irrelevances are too many
· Difficult to follow
· Ineffective transitions
· Rambling format
· Information/articles somewhat okay synthesized
|
· There is no apparent organization to the paper.
· Difficult to follow
· No or poor transitions
· No format
· No synthesis, only confusing summary of articles
|
|
|
Grammar/mechanics
• sentence structure
•punctuation/mechanics
|
· Manipulates complex sentences for effect/impact
· No punctuation or mechanical errors
|
· Uses complex sentences
· Few punctuation or mechanical errors
|
· Uses compound sentences
· Too many punctuation and/or mechanical errors
|
· Uses simple sentences
|
|
|
Content/Information
|
· Central idea is well developed and clarity of purpose is exhibited throughout the paper
· Abundance of evidence of critical, careful thought and analysis and/or insight.
· Evidence and examples are vivid and specific, while focus remains tight
· Top tourism journals have been used as source of information
· Excellent synthesis of relevant literature-at least 10-12 journal papers
|
· Central idea and clarity of purpose are generally evident throughout the paper
· Evidence of critical, careful thought and analysis and/or insight
· There are good, relevant supporting examples and evidence
· Top tourism journals have been used as source of information
· Summary of literature but no or little synthesis-at least 8-10 journal papers
|
· The central idea is expressed though it may be vague or too broad; some sense of purpose is maintained throughout the paper
· Some evidence of critical, careful thought and /or insight
· There are some examples and evidence, though general
· Some top tourism journals have been used as source of information, absence of synthesis of literature, at least 7-8 journal papers
·
|
· Central idea and clarity of purpose are absent or incompletely expressed and maintained
· Little or no evidence of critical, careful thought or analysis and/or insight
· There are too few, no examples and evidence or they are mostly irrelevant
· No scientific research sources have been used or very little (4-5 journal papers)
|
|
|
Paper Format
|
Font type: Times new roman, or Arial Narrow, Font size: 12, Spacing: double
|
Font type: Font size: 12 Spacing: double
|
Use different format
|
Use different format
|
|