Peer Evaluation

HRM635-RS-PeerEvaluationForm.docx

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Management homework help >Peer Evaluation

Complete this peer evaluation for each member of your team, including yourself. The average score from these evaluations will be your grade for the assignment.

Rate each team member on a scale of 1 to 100 with 100 being highest. Use the rubric on the second page to determine the score for each team member. Include comments explaining why you gave your teammate this score.

Your peer evaluations will be kept strictly confidential. Your grade for the evaluation will be posted in the grade book as an assignment, but individual ratings will not be shared.

Group Member: List Names	Rating: 1 – 100	Comments: Must Be Completed for Each Team Member
1. Your name
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

After the total for each student has been added together, and divided by the number of team members rating the student, calculate the following: ___/100 x 10% =____ out of 10 points for this evaluation.

Peer Evaluation Rubric:

CATEGORY	100-93 points (A) Excellent	92-83 points (B) Good	82-73 points (C) Improving	72-0 points (D) Needs Improvement
Contributions	Student routinely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. Student contributes a lot of effort.	Student usually provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. Student is a good group member who tries hard.	Student sometimes provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. Student is a satisfactory group member who does what is required.	Student rarely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. Student may refuse to participate.
Quality of Work	No correction or revision is necessary. Work is complete and of high quality.	Revisions and corrections may not be necessary and work is adequate for what is needed.	Some revision or correction is needed, or work is not always completed in the manner required.	Work provided constantly needs correction and revision and is often incomplete.
Time Management	All work is turned in on time or early. The team member is reliable for posting/submitting whole pieces that the group has put together, and responsibilities never need to be reassigned to compensate.	Work is, for the most part, on time, and on a few occasions early. For the most part, the team member is reliable for submitting completed team documents, and responsibilities do not need to be reassigned to compensate.	Occasionally the work is on time, and only rarely is it early. On one or two occasions the rest of the group needs to compensate for missing or late work. Comment by Chris Moore: Neither of these cells actually provide for "late" work.	Occasionally the work is on time, but it is never early. Team member cannot be relied on to turn in team documents, and other members sometimes must compensate for tardiness of work assigned.
Attitude	Student always has a positive attitude about the project and works well with the other team members. Any criticism provided by student is constructive.	Student usually has a positive attitude towards the work and the group, and conflict is usually minor. Any criticism provided by student is often constructive.	Attitude is hit or miss towards the project and the group, but member is tolerable for the most part. Criticism provided by student is on occasion constructive, if provided at all.	Student rarely has a positive attitude. Participation, quality of work, and time management are severely affected by attitude and team member has difficulties and conflict with group.