|
Criteria
|
0
Unacceptable
|
20
Developing
|
30
Competent
|
40
Exemplary
|
|
1. Create an outline of the whole-system approach for a consulting problem within an organization that deals with one of the issues.
|
Did not complete the assignment or did not create an outline of the whole-system approach for a consulting problem within an organization that deals with one of the issues; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 70% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
Partially created an outline of the whole-system approach for a consulting problem within an organization that deals with one of the issues; omitted some key information. Completed with 70-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
Sufficiently created an outline of the whole- system approach for a consulting problem within an organization that deals with one of the issues. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
Fully created an outline of the whole- system approach for a consulting problem within an organization that deals with one of the issues. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
|
2. Compare the outline to that of a third- party approach.
|
Did not compare the outline to that of a third-party approach; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 70% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
Partially compared the outline to that of a third-party approach; omitted some key information. Completed with 70-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
Sufficiently compared the outline to that of a third-party approach. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
Fully compared the outline to that of a third-party approach. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
|
|
|
Explained partially the importance of trusting the process; omitted some key information. Completed with 70-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
|
Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
|
4. Consider how positive deviance can be used in this consulting problem.
|
Did not complete the assignment or did not consider how positive deviance can be used in this consulting problem; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 70% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
Considered partially how positive deviance can be used in this consulting problem; omitted some key information. Completed with 70-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
Consider sufficiently how positive deviance can be used in this consulting problem. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
Considered fully how positive deviance can be used in this consulting problem. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic.
|
|
5. Clarity
|
Did not complete the assignment or explanations are unclear and not organized.
(Major issues)
|
Explanations generally unclear and not well organized.
(Many issues)
|
Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues)
|
Explanations very clear and well organized.
(Added helpful details)
|
|
6. Writing – Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, and APA usage.
|
Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Major issues)
|
Had 6-7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Many issues)
|
Had 4-5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Minor issues)
|
Had 0-3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage.
|