HRM 532 Talent Management

https:i/blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution ftlRMl 5321 1 ...

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric:

Points: 150 Assignment 2: Avon Products or GE Money America Case Study

Criteria Unacceptable

Below 70%F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A 1. Provide a brief description of the status of the company that led to its determination that a change was necessary.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a brief description of the status of the company that led to its determination that a change was necessarv.

Partially provided a brief description of the status of the company that led to its determination that a change was necessary.

Satisfactorily provided a brief description of the status ofthe company that led to its determinatien that a change was necessary"

Thoroughly provided a brief description of the status of the company that led to its determination that a change was necessary.

2. ldentify the model for change theory typified in the case study of your choice. Discuss what led you to identify the model that you did.

Weight:25%

Did not submit or incompletely identified the model for change theory typified in the case study of your choice and did not discuss what led you to the identify the model that you did.

Partially identified the model for change theory typified in the case study of your choice and partially discussed what led you to identify the model that you did.

Satisfactorily identified the model for change theory typified in the case study of your choice and satisfactorily discussed what led you to identify the model that you did.

Thoroughly identified the model for change theory typified in the case study ofyour choice and thoroughly discussed what led you to identify the model that you did.

3. lllustrate the types of evaluation information that were collected and how they are used to benefit the company.

Weight:20%

Did not submit or incompletely illustrated the types of evaluation information that were collected and how they are used to benefit the comDanv.

Partially illustrated the types of evaluation information that were collected and how they are used to benefit the company.

Satisfactorily illustrated the types of evaluation information that were collected and how they are used to benefit the company.

Thoroughly illustrated the types of evaluation information that were collected and how they are used to benefit the company.

success of the changes within the next five (5)

years and how adjustments could be made if the results become less than ideal.

Weight:25%

Did not submit or incompletely speculated about success of the changes within the next five (5) years and how adjustments could be made if the results become less than ideal.

Partially speculated about success of the changes within the next five (5) years and how adjustments could be made if the results become less than ideal.

Satisfactorily speculated about success of the changes within the next five (5) years and how adjustments could be made if the results become less than ideal.

Thoroughly speculated about success of the changes within the next five (5) years and how adjustments could be made if the results become less than ideal.

5. References

Weight:5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor oualitv choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weioht: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

I of I 112712020,10:28 AM