human resource
Techniques of Employee Selection & Recruitment
Chapter 9: External Selection II
Muhammet Sait Dinc [email protected]
Textbook:
Heneman, Herbert Judge, Timothy A. and Kammeyer- Muller, John (8th Edition – 2014). Staffing
Organizations, McGraw-Hill Irwin. ISBN 13: 978-007- 108647-9.
Organization Strategy HR and Staffing Strategy
Staffing Policies and Programs
Staffing System and Retention Management
Support Activities
Legal compliance
Planning
Job analysis
Core Staffing Activities
Recruitment: External, internal
Selection: Measurement, external, internal
Employment: Decision making, final match
Organization
Mission
Goals and Objectives
Staffing Organizations Model
9-3
External Selection II Outline
• Substantive Assessment Methods • Personality Tests • Ability Tests • Emotional Intelligence Tests • Performance Tests and Work Samples • Situational Judgment Tests • Integrity Tests • Interest, Values, and Preference
Inventories • Structured Interview • Choice of Substantive Assessment
Methods
• Discretionary Assessment Methods
• Contingent Assessment Methods • Drug testing • Medical exams
Ex. 8.3 Assessment Methods by Applicant
Flow Stage
•Substantive
assessment methods
• Determining who
among the minimally
qualified will likely be
the best performers
on the job
9-5
9-6
Overview of Personality Tests
• Current role of personality tests e.g., role of Big Five • Describe behavioral, not emotional or cognitive traits
• May capture up to 75% of an individual’s personality
• Big Five factors (Personality Characteristics Inventory etc.) • Emotional stability-calm, optimistic, and well adjusted
• Extraversion-sociable, assertive, active, upbeat, and talkative
• Openness to experience-imaginative, attentive to inner feelings, have intellectual curiosity and independence of judgment
• Agreeableness-altruistic, trusting, sympathetic, and cooperative
• Conscientiousness-purposeful, determined, dependable, and attentive to detail
• Roughly 50% of the variance in the Big Five traits appears to be inherited
9-7
Ex. 9.1 Sample Items from the Personal Characteristics Inventory
• Conscientiousness • I can always be counted on to get the job done.
• I am a very persistent worker.
• I almost always plan things in advance of work.
• Extraversion • Meeting new people is enjoyable to me.
• I like to stir up excitement if things get boring.
• I am a “take-charge” type of person.
9-8
Ex. 9.1 Sample Items from the Personal Characteristics Inventory
• Agreeableness • I like to help others who are down on their luck. • I usually see the good side of people. • I forgive others easily.
• Emotional Stability • I can become annoyed at people quite easily (reverse-scored). • At times I don’t care about much of anything (reverse-scored). • My feelings tend to be easily hurt (reverse-scored).
• Openness to Experience • I like to work with difficult concepts and ideas. • I enjoy trying new and different things. • I tend to enjoy art, music, or literature.
9-9
Ex. 9.2 Implications of Big Five Personality Traits at Work
9-10
Criticisms of Personality Tests
• Trivial validities • Correlations for any individual trait with job performance are typically low (around r=.23)
• However, when all traits are used simultaneously, correlations are higher
• Faking • Individuals answer in a dishonest way
• However, tests still have some validity, and it may be that being able to “act” conscientiously may be related to real job performance
• Negative applicant reactions • Applicants, in general, believe personality tests are less valid predictors of job performance
9-11
Exhibit 9.3 The Core Self-Evaluations Scale
9-12
Overview of Ability Tests
• Definition -- Measures that assess an individual’s capacity to function in a certain way
• 15 to 20% of organizations use ability tests in selection
• Two types • Aptitude - Assess innate capacity to function
• Achievement - Assess learned capacity to function
9-13
Overview of Ability Tests
• Four classes of ability tests • Cognitive: perception, memory, reasoning, verbal, math, expression
• Psychomotor: thought/body movement coordination
• Physical: strength, endurance, movement quality
• Sensory/perceptual: detection & recognition of stimuli
9-14
Exhibit 9.4 Sample Cognitive Ability Test Items
9-15
Emotional Intelligence
• The ability to monitor one’s own and others’ feelings, to discriminate among them, and to use this information to guide one’s thinking and action • Self-awareness: Good at recognizing and understanding one’s own emotions
• Other awareness: Good at recognizing and understanding others’ emotions
• Emotion regulation: Good at making use of or managing this awareness
9-16
Performance Tests and Work Samples
• Definition -- Assess actual performance (e.g., fix a car, teach a class, type a document)
• Types of tests (should focus on relevant KSAOs) • Performance test vs. work sample (all or some) • Motor vs verbal work samples (action or thought) • High- vs. low-fidelity tests (level of realism) • Computer interaction performance tests vs. paper-and-pencil tests including
simulations (e.g., The Manager’s Workshop)
• All the above can have good validity (.50+) & acceptance
9-17
Situational Judgment Tests
• Place applicants in hypothetical, job-related situations.
• Applicants are then asked to choose a course of action from several alternatives
• Capture the validity of work samples and cognitive ability tests in a way that is cheaper than work samples and that has less adverse impact than cognitive ability tests
9-18
Ex. 9.7: Example of Situational Judgment Test Item
9-19
Interest, Values, and Preference Inventories
• Assess activities individuals prefer to do on & off the job; do not attempt to assess ability to do these
• Not often used in selection
• Can be useful for self-selection into job types
• Types of tests • Strong Vocational Interest Blank (SVIB) • Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI)
• Evaluation • Unlikely to predict job performance directly • May help assess person-organization fit & subsequent job satisfaction, commitment &
turnover
9-20
Discussion questions
• Describe the similarities and differences between personality tests and integrity tests. When is each warranted in the selection process?
• How would you advise an organization considering adopting a cognitive ability test for selection?
9-21
Typical Unstructured Interviews
• Relatively unplanned and “quick and dirty”
• Questions based on interviewer “hunches” or “pet questions” to assess applicants
• Casual, open-ended, or subjective questions
• Often contains obtuse questions
• Often contains highly speculative questions
• Interviewer often unprepared
• More potential for discrimination and bias
• Validity typically r=.20
9-22
Structured Interviews
• Questions based on job analysis
• Same questions asked of each candidate
• Response to each question numerically evaluated
• Detailed anchored rating scales used to score each response
• Detailed notes taken, focusing on interviewees’ behaviors
• Validity may be r=.30 or better
• Surprisingly uncommon in organizations
9-23
Structured Interviews (continued)
• Situational - Assess applicant’s ability to project his / her behaviors to future situations. Assumes the person’s goals/intentions will predict future behavior
• Experience-based - Assess past behaviors that are linked to prospective job. Assumes past performance will predict future performance
⚫Research is inconclusive regarding which type is best
⚫Individual interviews usually more valid than panel
interviews
9-24
Constructing a Structured Interview
• Consult job requirements matrix
• Develop the selection plan • Exh. 9.10: Partial Selection Plan for Job of Retail Store Sales Associate
• Develop structured interview plan • Exh. 9.11: Structured Interview Questions, Benchmark Responses, Rating
Scale, and Question Weights
• Select and train interviewers
• Evaluate effectiveness
9-25
Discussion questions
• Describe the structured interview. What are the characteristics of structured interviews that improve on the shortcomings of unstructured interviews?
9-26
Exhibit 9.14 Evaluation of Substantive Assessment Methods
9-27
Discretionary Assessment Methods
• Used to separate people who receive job offers from list of finalists (assumes each finalist is considered fully qualified for position)
• Often very subjective, relying heavily on intuition of decision maker
• Factors other than KSAOs are evaluated • Assess person/organization match • Assess motivation level • Assess people on relevant organizational
citizenship behaviors
• Should involve organization’s staffing philosophy regarding EEO/AA commitments
9-28
Contingent Assessment Methods
• “We offer you this job contingent upon ….”
• Contingent methods not always used • Depends on nature of job and legal mandates
• Might involve confirmation of • Drug test results
• Medical exam results
Thank you