Organisational behaviour assignment

Criteria

Detail

Score

Comments

Professionalism

On time for presentation, formal attire and style

/10

Conforms to directions – time, 4 speakers, 8 slides, 12 minutes

Each part included.

/10

Information

Clearly presented, interesting, relevant

/10

Communication Skills

Clarity, pace, fluency. Displayed engagement and interaction with audience

/10

Use of visual aids

Carefully prepared and utilised well. Minimal errors, well-designed.

/10

Total score

/50

Weighting %

/10

Criteria

Fail

Pass

50-59%

Credit

60-69%

Distinction

70-79%

High Distinction

80-100%

Executive Summary (5%)

Not all elements included.

Passable summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations.

Adequate summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations.

Reasonably comprehensive and concise summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations.

Comprehensive and concise summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations.

Introduction (5%)

Purpose missing or unclear. Scope unclear or absent.

Purpose stated but lacks clarity, Scope indicated; elements missing or lack clarity.

Purpose clearly stated. Scope clearly stated.

Purpose and scope clearly stated with professional level of detail

Authorization included. Purpose clearly stated. Scope clearly stated with specific detail appropriate to this report. Limitations included.

Content

Clear and comprehensive

answers to the questions

provided using references

and personal insight. (25%)

Fails to provide clear and

comprehensive answers

to the questions and

provides no references or

personal insight.

Answers provided are

limited in their exploration

and show limited research

and personal insight.

Answers provided are

clear showing evidence of

research and personal

insight.

Clearly and concisely

developed answers to the

questions, evidence of broad

research and developed

personal insight

Outstanding and insightful

answers to the questions

demonstrating extensive research

and in-depth personal insight.

Content

Demonstrates soundness

and thoroughness of your

research. (25%)

Information selected is

not relevant or of poor

quality and insufficient.

Research is not logical,

relevant or suitable.

Some information

irrelevant; inadequate

range/depth of research.

Information provided has

a reasonable depth of

understanding and

demonstrates soundness

and thoroughness of

research

Information obtained

demonstrates sound

comprehension research.

Information gathered is

particularly relevant enabling

depth and knowledge that are

particularly pertinent

demonstrating depth of research.

Conclusion and Recommendations (15%)

Little or no summary

provided.

Adequate but basic

summary provided.

Good, reasonably

thorough summary

provided.

Comprehensive summary

provided.

Comprehensive, clear and

concise summary provided.

Teamwork (10%)

Based on the marker’s assessment of the Assignment, and the Group’s self-assessment it is clear that the Group failed to meet the “Competent” level of Group performance and this was demonstrated by a Pass or Fail Grade for Assign.

Based on the marker’s assessment of the Assignment, and the Group’s self-assessment; It is clear that the Group achieved the “Competent” level of Group performance and this was demonstrated by a Pass or C Grade for the Assignment.

Based on the marker’s assessment of the Assignment, and the Group’s self-assessment; It is clear that the Group achieved the “Competent” level of Group performance and this was demonstrated by a C or D Grade for the Assignment.

Based on the marker’s assessment of the Assignment, and the Group’s self-assessment; It is clear that the Group achieved the “Sophisticated” or “Competent” level of Group performance and this was demonstrated by a D or HD Grade for the Assignment.

Based on the marker’s assessment of the Assignment, and the Group’s self-assessment; It is clear that the Group achieved the “Sophisticated” level of Group performance and this was demonstrated by a D or HD Grade for the Assignment.

Presentation, format & attention to detail

(5%)

Did not meet criterion.

Report is reasonably well organised.

Acceptable standard of attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression).

Report is well organised and clearly communicates ideas.

Good standard of attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression).

Organisation controls and enhances message. Communicates ideas effectively.

High standard of attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression).

Professional aesthetic and organization act to control and enhance the reader’s understanding of the content. Communicates ideas effectively.

Excellent attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression).

Referencing

(10%)

Little or no Harvard style referencing used.

Harvard style referencing used in parts of the presentation (both in- text referencing and references list); however improvement in correct style and consistency is required.

An attempt at referencing in Harvard style is evident throughout most of the presentation, (both in-text referencing and references list), with improvements required in consistency.

Correct referencing in Harvard style is evident throughout most of the presentation (both in-text referencing and references list), with only minor corrections

required.

Faultless referencing in Harvard style is evident throughout the whole presentation (both in-text referencing and references list).