ethical scenario individual response 1 hour only
fakerxiang
homeworkresource.docx[在此处键入]
Characters: Sam, student; Cory, Sam’s school friend
Read the following scenario carefully, and develop a response based on your understanding of the criteria for ethical judgement discussed in.
|
Criterion |
Exemplary 5 |
Accomplished 4 |
Sufficient 3 |
Developing 2 |
Beginning 1 |
Score |
|
Ethical Analysis |
Provided insightful, carefully considered ideas. Demonstrated a thorough comprehension and explanation of the case and argument. Connection between ideas and ethical criteria is effective. |
Provided thoughtful ideas, conveyed a thorough comprehension of the case, explanation of argument. Connection between ideas, ethical criteria is clear. |
Presented clear, general ideas demonstrated a fair understanding of the case and explanation of the argument. Connection between ideas and ethical criteria is present. |
Presented some relevant ideas, demonstrated a very basic understanding of the argument. Connection between ideas and ethical criteria was not present or was unclear. |
Ethical analysis was not apparent. Ideas lacked depth and/or clarity. No clear connection between ideas and ethical criteria. |
(x 2 ) =
/10 |
|
Supporting Details |
Evidence was precise, persuasive, and carefully chosen to support ideas presented. |
Strong supporting evidence that was well chosen and supports the ideas presented. |
Relevant supporting evidence that generally supported ideas presented. |
Supporting evidence was weak or otherwise unconvincing. |
Supporting details incomplete or non-existent. |
/5 |
|
Writing Style |
Expressed ideas with polished, clear, original phrasing is effective and convincing, only 1-2 errors in grammar or mechanics. |
Used effective original writing and construction to express ideas, with 3-5 errors in grammar or mechanics. |
Expressed ideas in an understandable way but with more than 5 errors in grammar, mechanics, or style. |
Content and style of writing was often unclear with more than 5 errors in grammar, mechanics, or style. |
Content and style of writing was very unclear because of errors in grammar, mechanics, or style throughout. |
/5 |
|
Total |
/20 = |
/5% of final mark |
Sam thought it might be difficult to make friends when he went to NAIT, but three weeks into his first semester, he had found two friends he had “clicked” with immediately. They did everything together, from basketball to homework.
Sam was in the same program as one of these friends, Cory, and they shared the same classes. Sam noticed that his friend cheated profusely in class. Not only would Cory plagiarize assignments, but he would also use his phone to cheat on tests. Still they were friends; whatever Cory did in class was his own business and should not matter to the friendship, Sam thought.
One night, however, the three friends were playing cards, and Cory kept getting good hand after good hand. As much as Sam wanted to call it coincidence, he couldn’t help thinking of Cory cheating in class. Another time, Sam played against his two friends in basketball; Cory claimed he was fouled even though Sam didn’t see it.
Now, Cory has asked for a look at Sam’s homework – just to give Cory an idea of where to start. Sam wants to help his friend out, but worries about what Cory’s real intentions might be.
Is Sam just being paranoid? Would it make sense for Sam to trust his other friend more than Cory? Does cheating in class reflect anything about your character outside of it?
