ASSIGNEMNTS*K-E-V-I-N
Mini Assignment 2 Template.docx
Mini Assignment 2 Template
|
Title of the source for the Research-Driven Critique Essay (PART 1) I`m not a fake Canadian |
|
Deconstruct the Source Write a one-paragraph summary. Answer questions based on your source. Summary
Write a paragraph that answers the following questions If you're using a Narrative: What makes the narrative seem truthful, important, and relevant? Why should the narrative matter to other people today? What voice or perspective does the narrative allow us to hear that is perhaps often hidden? Moreover, what do you think are some other possible perspectives on the same issue/problem raised in the narrative? In other words, how would the same experience/issue/problem look from a different perspective?
|
|
Academic Integrity (Part 2) For each of the three scenarios below, identify whether the action is acceptable or unacceptable, and give the reason why.
Scenario 1 You copy a paragraph or an image from an Internet source and paste it into your COMM 171 essay. Is this action acceptable or unacceptable? Why?
Scenario 2 You and your friend complete an essay that your instructor said must be done independently, and each of you submits it as your own work in different sections of COMM 171. Is this action acceptable or unacceptable? Why?
Scenario 3 You conduct research on a topic and paraphrase it in your COMM 171 essay by using your own words and a unique sentence structure. You use synonyms where possible. You include an in-text citation and a reference list entry. Is this action acceptable or unacceptable? Why?
|
|
Keep a record of your research List 2 sources of each type. Newspaper and Magazine Sources
· Source 1:
· Relevance:
· Source 2:
· Relevance:
Videos/Images
· Source 1:
· Relevance:
· Source 2:
· Relevance:
Library and/or Database Sources
· Source 1:
· Relevance:
· Source 2:
· Relevance:
|
|
Annotated Bibliography (Part 3) Source 1 APA entry:
Annotation:
Source 2 APA entry:
Annotation:
Source 3 APA entry:
Annotation:
|
Mini Assignment 2 Rubric.docx
Mini Assignment 2 Rubric (10%)
|
|
At/ Near Fully Revised Stage: Fine-Tune 10-9-8 |
Developing Draft Stage: Apply More Strategies 7-6-5 |
Preliminary Draft Stage: Study and Apply Core Strategies 4-3-2-1-0 |
|
Preliminary Work (Unit 6 steps) /10 |
Responses are complete and well developed. Answers the questions. Draws on evidence from the sources. Communicates clearly with few errors. |
All of the responses are attempted and are on-track in terms of the criteria. Next: - Develop the precision and depth of the responses. - Ensure that all responses are on-track (e.g. summary conventions, response conventions) |
Some or all of the responses are attempted. Next: - Revisit the fundamentals of summary and response. - Study how to extend your responses with attention to textual detail, and/or how to revise your work for clarity and readability. |
|
Source Process Work (Unit 7 steps) /10 |
Academic honesty practice is complete. Source list is complete, including short statements of relevancy for each source found. |
All process pieces have been attempted. There may be some gaps to fill in (such as a statement of relevancy, or a missing source) Next: - Complete small missing pieces |
Evidence of some attempt to complete (parts of) the process, but significant gaps needs to be filled. Next: - Work with tutor, strategist or instructor to address gaps in understanding |
|
Annotated Bibliography: Relevance and Usefulness of Sources /5 |
All three sources appear relevant and useful in terms of developing the critique of the main source. Next: - Proceed with the research essay. |
It is not yet clear how at least one of the sources will help further the critique of the main source. Next: - Clarify the relevance of the source(s) in question. |
Based on the annotations provided, it appears that new or additional sources will be required for the critique to work. Next: - Clarify the relevance of the sources. |
|
Annotated Bibliography: Content of the Entries and Annotations /10
|
Bibliographic entries are complete and accurate. Bibliographic list is alphabetized. Annotation summarizes the source clearly and briefly. Annotation explains the relevance of the source to the project Next: - Proceed with the research essay.
|
Bibliographic entries require minor editing for small corrections and/or alphabetization of entries. Summary part is in place but requires editing for clarity and/or conventions of the brief summary. Relevance part is in place but requires editing for clarity. Next: - Edit as required for correctness, clarity, and conventions. |
Bibliographic entries require substantial editing. Annotation requires missing pieces (summary and/or relevance part), and/or editing to cut off-topic or irrelevant information. Next: - Study the APA format through some of the guides provided. - Study the fundamentals of the Annotated Bibliography--bibliographic entries and annotations, as required. Consult the instructor and/or a tutor. |
|
/5 |
Writing is clear, coherent, organized and correct enough that the reader has no trouble grasping the meaning Next: - Correct minor errors - Experiment with different syntax and punctuation techniques |
Language is often or sometimes clear, correct and coherent. Next: - Practice techniques of concision - Read work aloud to correct errors of grammar, spelling, etc. |
Ideas have been put down but are not yet organized and clarified enough to be followed easily. Next: - Study the fundamentals of clear prose writing - Consult instructor/CAE tutor |
Total: /40