Article review

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 70%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Points Earned

Clear and Precise Abstract

9 to 10 points

Provides a very clear and precise abstract that accurately summarizes the article.

7 to 8 points

Provides a vague abstract that summarizes the article.

1 to 6 points

Abstract does not provide a good summary of article

0 points

No Content

Selection of Article

18 to 20 points

Article meets search criteria of assignment.

Peer-reviewed source, current article and supports Healthy People 2020. Appropriate and relevant data and statistics.

11 to 17 points

Article meets search criteria of assignment.

Peer-reviewed source, current article and supports Healthy People 2020.

Did not provide appropriate and relevant data and statistics.

1 to 10 points

Article does not meet search criteria of assignment.

Not peer-reviewed source.

Does not support Healthy People 2020. Did not provide appropriate and relevant data and statistics.

0 points

No Content

Related Research

18 to 20 points

Additional sources used. Related research is peer reviewed. Consistent with Healthy People 2020 objectives. Appropriate and relevant data and statistics.

11 to 17 points

Additional sources used.

Related research is peer reviewed.

Consistent with Healthy People 2020 objectives. Did not provide appropriate and relevant data and statistics.

1 to 10 points

One source used; Related research is not peer reviewed.

Article is not consistent with Healthy People 2020 objectives. Did not provide appropriate and relevant data and statistics.

0 points

No Content

Conclusion/

Recommendation

13 to 15 points

Provide in –depth information on the findings and recommendation for further study

8 to 12 points

Provide in –depth information on the findings.

Lacks recommendation for further study

1 to 7 points

Does not provide in –depth information on the findings.

Lacks recommendation for further study

0 points

No Content

Structure 30%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Points Earned

Discussion

20 to 25 points

Evaluate research methods in the article, discuss the research project. Includes an opinion of article rigor, usefulness, validity, reliability, soundness, design, and applicability to community health.

.

11 to 19 points

Evaluate research methods in the article, discuss the research project. Does not include an opinion of article rigor, usefulness, validity, reliability, soundness, design, and applicability to community health.

1 to 10 points

Provides vague evaluation of research methods in the article.

Does not include an opinion of article rigor, usefulness, validity, reliability, soundness, design, and applicability to community health.

0 points

No Content

Quality

8 to 10 points

Easy to read and understand

Spelling and grammar are correct

Punctuation is correct

Reference list is AMA compliant

AMA format for all citations

5 to 7 points

Easy to read and understand

Spelling and grammar errors

Punctuation is correct

Reference list is AMA compliant

AMA format for all citations

1 to 4 points

Difficult to read and understand

Spelling and grammar errors

Punctuation is not correct

Reference list is not AMA compliant

Wrong AMA format for all citations

0 points

No Content

Total Points

/100