|
Criteria
|
Levels of Achievement
|
|
|
Content 70%
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not present
|
Points Earned
|
|
Title Page
|
5 to 5 points
This page includes Title, Student name/SID, Course/section and Date
|
3 to 4 points
This page includes Title, Student name/SID, but lacks Course/section and Date
|
1 to 2 points
This page includes Title, but lacks Student name/SID, Course/section and Date
|
0 points
No Content
|
|
|
Abstract
|
9 to 10 points
The abstract is between 150- 200 words.
Provides adequate summary of the paper.
|
5 to 8 points
The abstract is between 150- 200 words. Lacks adequate summary of the paper.
|
1 to 4 points
The abstract is less than 150 words.
The abstract is more than 200 words. Lacks adequate summary of the paper.
|
0 points
No Content
|
|
|
Introduction
|
17 to 20 Points
The introduction includes a good definition of the problem. Relates chosen objective. Relates to poor, underserved, or vulnerable population
|
10 to 16 Points
The introduction does not include a good definition of the problem. Relates chosen objective. Relates to poor, underserved, or vulnerable population.
|
1 to 9 Points
The introduction does not include a good definition of the problem. Lacks correlation with chosen objective. Does not relate to poor, underserved, or vulnerable population
|
0 Points
No Content
|
|
|
Background
|
17 to 20 Points
Provides adequate review of objective
|
10 to 16 Points
Provide a brief review of objective
|
1 to 9 Points
Does not provide a review of objective
|
0 Points
No Content
|
|
|
Current Research
|
20 to 25 Points
The research is Timely.
Relevant to objective
|
12 to 19 Points
The research is Timely.
Not relevant to objective
|
1 to 11 Points
The research is not timely.
Not relevant to objective
|
0 Points
No Content
|
|
|
Discussion
|
35 to 40 Points
Provides thorough evaluation
Discussion of pros and cons of various approaches.
Includes analysis of available statistical measures.
Reveals limits and relative merits of data.
|
24 to 34 Points
Provides thorough evaluation
Discussion of pros and cons of various approaches.
Includes analysis of available statistical measures.
Does not include limits and relative merits of data.
|
1 to 23 Points
Provides thorough evaluation
Discussion of pros and cons of various approaches.
Lacks analysis of available statistical measures.
Does not include limits and relative merits of data.
|
0 Points
No Content
|
|
|
Recommendations
|
17 to 20 Points
Recommendations are clearly stated and based on science not emotion.
Integrates opinions with literature presented.
|
11 to 16 Points
Recommendations are clearly stated and based on science not emotion.
Does not integrate opinions with literature presented.
|
1 to 10 Points
Recommendations are not clearly stated and based on science.
Does not integrate opinions with literature presented.
|
0 Points
No Content
|
|
|
Structure 30%
|
Advanced
|
Proficient
|
Developing
|
Not present
|
Points Earned
|
|
References
|
25 to 30 points
Includes at least ten references.
References are correctly numbered.
Includes appropriate citations in text.
All references are in AMA style.
|
18 to 24 points
Includes at least ten references.
References are correctly numbered.
Lacks appropriate citations in text.
All references are not in AMA style.
|
1 to 17 points
Includes less than ten references.
References are not correctly numbered. Lacks appropriate citations in text. All references are not in AMA style.
|
0 points
No Content
|
|
|
Grammar/Spelling
|
25 to 30 Points
Correct spelling;
Sentence structure;
Paragraph structure;
and Punctuation.
Uses AMA style throughout the paper.
|
18 to 24 Points
Correct spelling;
Sentence structure;
Paragraph structure;
and Punctuation.
Does not use AMA style throughout the paper.
|
1 to 17 Points
Incorrect spelling;
Sentence structure;
Paragraph structure;
and Punctuation.
Does not use AMA style throughout the paper.
|
0 Points
No Content
|
|
|
Total Points
|
/200
|
Ak88
HLTH630_Research_Paper-Final_Paper_Grading_Rubric_2.docx
0
