Applied Sciences Logic Model Assignment Instructions

5/23/26, 5:46 PM

Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc

Logic Model - Rubric Total 25 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

Health Issue and

Population Affected

Health Issue and

Population Affected

0 points

The description of the

health issue and

population affected is not

present.

1.63 points

The description of the

health issue and

population affected is

present but lacks detail or

is incomplete.

1.88 points

The description of the

health issue and

population affected is

present.

2.13 points

The description of the

health issue and

population affected is

detailed.

2.5 points

The description of the

health issue and

population affected is

thorough.

Proposed Intervention

and Supporting Theory

Proposed Intervention and

Supporting Theory

0 points

The description of the

proposed intervention and

supporting theory is not

present.

1.63 points

The description of the

proposed intervention and

supporting theory is

present but lacks detail or

is incomplete.

1.88 points

The description of the

proposed intervention and

supporting theory is

present.

2.13 points

The description of the

proposed intervention and

supporting theory is

detailed.

2.5 points

The description of the

proposed intervention and

supporting theory is

thorough.

Inputs Needed for

Proposed Intervention

Inputs Needed for

Proposed Intervention

0 points

The description of inputs

needed for the proposed

intervention is not present.

1.63 points

The description of inputs

needed for the proposed

intervention is present but

lacks details or is

incomplete.

1.88 points

The description of inputs

needed for the proposed

intervention is present.

2.13 points

The description of inputs

needed for the proposed

intervention is detailed.

2.5 points

The description of inputs

needed for the proposed

intervention is thorough.

Activities Needed for

Proposed Intervention

Activities Needed for

Proposed Intervention

0 points

The description of activities

needed for the proposed

intervention is not present.

1.63 points

The description of activities

needed for the proposed

intervention is present but

lacks details or is

incomplete.

1.88 points

The description of activities

needed for the proposed

intervention is present.

2.13 points

The description of activities

needed for the proposed

intervention is detailed.

2.5 points

The description of activities

needed for the proposed

intervention is thorough.

Outputs Resulting From

Activities

Outputs Resulting From

Activities

0 points

The description of outputs

resulting from the activities

is not present.

1.63 points

The description of outputs

resulting from the activities

is present but lacks details

or is incomplete.

1.88 points

The description of outputs

resulting from the activities

is present.

2.13 points

The description of outputs

resulting from the activities

is detailed.

2.5 points

The description of outputs

resulting from the activities

is thorough.

Short-Term, Intermediate

, and Long-Term

Outcomes

Short-Term, Intermediate ,

and Long-Term Outcomes

0 points

The description of short-

term, intermediate, and

long-term outcomes is not

present.

3.25 points

The description of short-

term, intermediate, and

long-term outcomes is

present but lacks details or

is incomplete.

3.75 points

The description of short-

term, intermediate, and

long-term outcomes is

present.

4.25 points

The description of short-

term, intermediate, and

long-term outcomes is

detailed.

5 points

The description of short-

term, intermediate, and

long-term outcomes is

thorough.

Thesis Development and

Purpose

Thesis Development and

Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible

overall purpose or

organizing claim.

1.14 points

Thesis is insufficiently

developed or vague.

Purpose is not clear.

1.31 points

Thesis is apparent and

appropriate to purpose.

1.49 points

Thesis is clear and

forecasts the development

of the paper. Thesis is

descriptive and reflective

of the arguments and

appropriate to the

purpose.

1.75 points

Thesis is comprehensive

and contains the essence

of the paper. Thesis

statement makes the

purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and

Construction

Argument Logic and

Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is

not justified by the

conclusion. The conclusion

does not support the claim

made. Argument is

incoherent and uses

1.3 points

Sufficient justification of

claims is lacking. Argument

lacks consistent unity.

There are obvious flaws in

the logic. Some sources

have questionable

1.5 points

Argument is orderly, but

may have a few

inconsistencies. The

argument presents

minimal justification of

claims. Argument logically,

1.7 points

Argument shows logical

progression. Techniques of

argumentation are evident.

There is a smooth

progression of claims from

introduction to conclusion.

2 points

Clear and convincing

argument presents a

persuasive claim in a

distinctive and compelling

manner. All sources are

authoritative.

5/23/26, 5:46 PM

Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc

noncredible sources. credibility. but not thoroughly,

supports the purpose.

Sources used are credible.

Introduction and

conclusion bracket the

thesis.

Most sources are

authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling,

punctuation, grammar,

language use.

0 points

Surface errors are

pervasive enough that they

impede communication of

meaning. Inappropriate

word choice or sentence

construction is used.

0.81 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors distract

the reader. Inconsistencies

in language choice

(register) or word choice

are present. Sentence

structure is correct but not

varied.

0.94 points

Some mechanical errors or

typos are present, but they

are not overly distracting

to the reader. Correct and

varied sentence structure

and audience-appropriate

language are employed.

1.06 points

Prose is largely free of

mechanical errors,

although a few may be

present. The writer uses a

variety of effective

sentence structures and

figures of speech.

1.25 points

Writer is clearly in

command of standard,

written, academic English.

Paper Format

Use of appropriate style for

the major and assignment.

0 points

Template is not used

appropriately, or

documentation format is

rarely followed correctly.

0.81 points

Appropriate template is

used, but some elements

are missing or mistaken. A

lack of control with

formatting is apparent.

0.94 points

Appropriate template is

used. Formatting is correct,

although some minor

errors may be present.

1.06 points

Appropriate template is

fully used. There are

virtually no errors in

formatting style.

1.25 points

All format elements are

correct.

Documentation of

Sources

Citations, footnotes,

references, bibliography,

etc., as appropriate to

assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not

documented.

0.81 points

Documentation of sources

is inconsistent or incorrect,

as appropriate to

assignment and style, with

numerous formatting

errors.

0.94 points

Sources are documented,

as appropriate to

assignment and style,

although some formatting

errors may be present.

1.06 points

Sources are documented,

as appropriate to

assignment and style, and

format is mostly correct.

1.25 points

Sources are completely

and correctly documented,

as appropriate to

assignment and style, and

format is free of error.

© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.