Applied Statistics T5 DQ2
Article Analysis 1
|
Article Citation and Permalink (APA format) |
Article 1 Doust, M. V., Hojjati, H., & Farhangi, H. (2020). Effect of spiritual care based on Ghalbe Salim on anxiety in adolescents with cancer. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(6), 2857-2865.
https://eds-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=1af38ed8-5f3c-4845-bf43-c682b6d18058%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=edsjsr.10.2307.45387013&db=edsjsr |
Article 2 Miraki, M. R., Nasirzadeh, M., Sayadi, A. R., & AbdolKarimi, M. (2024). Effect of the Lazarus’ transactional model-based intervention on stress control and coping in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Education and Health Promotion, 12(4), 597-603 https://eds-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=8ad389eb-7089-49ee-92bb-bc8d55dad3f9%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#db=cul&AN=182103762
|
|
Criteria |
Description |
Description |
|
Broad Topic Area/Title |
Effect of spiritual care based on Ghalbe Salim on anxiety in adolescents with cancer. |
Effect of the Lazarus’ transactional model-based intervention on stress control and coping in patients with type 2 diabetes. |
|
Identify Independent and Dependent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables |
Independent Variable: Spiritual care intervention (Categorical: intervention vs. control group) The dependent variable is anxiety levels among adolescents with cancer (Ordinal: measured on the March Anxiety Scale for Children). |
Independent Variable – Educational intervention based on Lazarus transactional model (Categorical – intervention and control groups) Dependent variables: The dependent variables of the study include stress levels and coping habits of the patients with type 2 diabetes (ordinal data: collected using the Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, as well as the Jalowiec Coping Strategies Scale). |
|
Population of Interest for the Study |
At the Pediatric Center of Doctor Sheikh Hospital located in Mashhad, Iran, adolescents with cancer. |
Type 2 diabetic patients who were being treated at the diabetes clinic of Anar City, Iran. |
|
Sample |
40 adolescents with cancer - 20 in the intervention (spiritual care) group - 20 in the control group |
82 patients with type 2 diabetes - 40 in the intervention group - 42 in the control group |
|
Sampling Method |
Randomized sampling method. Randomly, participants were assigned to the intervention and control groups. |
Method: The method utilized was randomized sampling method on basis of available patient records at the diabetes clinic. |
|
Descriptive Statistics (Mean, Median, Mode; Standard Deviation) Identify examples of descriptive statistics in the article. |
Before Intervention: - Intervention Group Anxiety Score: 75.25 ± 15.2 No significant difference (p < 0.01) in Control Group Anxiety Score. After Intervention: - Intervention Group Anxiety Score: 44.55 ± 7.62 The effect of the intervention made up 50% of the posttest changes. |
Before Intervention: In Intervention Group, perceived stress score was found to be 25.17 ± 7.25. The Control Group Perceived Stress score was 26.20 ± 6.11. After Intervention: The Intervention Group Perceived Stress Score was 13.47 ± 4.73. - For Control Group, mean score of Control Group Perceived Stress Score was 29.25 ± 5.57 A significant effect (p < 0.001) via analysis of covariance was confirmed. |
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
2
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.