Article Analysis 2

renol81

HLT-362Rubric-ArticleAnalysis2.pdf

Home >Nursing homework help >Article Analysis 2

Article Analysis 2 - Rubric

Two Quantitative Articles 13 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 13 points

Two articles are presented and are based on quantitative research.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

N/A

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Two articles are presented, but only one article is based on quantitative research.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

N/A

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Fewer than two articles are presented and do not use quantitative research.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Article Citations and Permalinks 13 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 13 points

Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are accurately

presented in APA format. Page numbers are accurate and used in all areas when

citing information.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in

APA format. Page numbers are used to cite information. There are minor errors.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in

APA format, but there are errors. Page numbers to cite information are missing, or

incorrect, in some areas.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Article citations and permalinks are presented. There are significant errors. Page

numbers are not indicated to cite information, or the page numbers are incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Article citations and permalinks are omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Broad Topic Area/Title 7.8 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 7.8 points

Broad topic area and title are fully presented and accurate.

4. Acceptable 6.63 points

Broad topic area and title are presented. There are some minor errors, but the

content overall is accurate.

3. Approaching 5.85 points

Broad topic area and title are summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies.

2. Insufficient 5.07 points

Broad topic area and title are referenced but are incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Broad topic area and title are omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Null and Alternative Hypotheses 13 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 13 points

Hypotheses are accurate and clearly defined.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Hypotheses are clearly defined. There are some minor inaccuracies.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Hypotheses are generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Hypotheses are summarized. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Hypotheses are omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Independent and Dependent Variable Types and Data for Variable 13 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 13 points

Variable types and data for variables are presented and accurate.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

Variable types and data for variables are presented. Minor detail is needed for

accuracy.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

Variable types and data for variables are presented. There are inaccuracies.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

Variable types and data for variables are presented. There are major inaccuracies or

omissions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Variable types and data for variables are omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Population of Interest for the Study 6.5 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 6.5 points

Population of interest for the study is presented and accurate.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Population of interest for the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for

accuracy.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Population of interest for the study is presented. There are inaccuracies.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Population of interest for the study is presented. There are major inaccuracies or

omissions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Population of interest for the study is omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Sample 6.5 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 6.5 points

Sample is presented and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Sample is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample

information is provided.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Sample is presented. There are inaccuracies.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Sample is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sample is omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Sampling Method 6.5 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 6.5 points

Sampling method is presented and accurate.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Sampling is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Sampling is presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information

is omitted.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Sampling is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sampling method is omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

How Was Data Collected? 6.5 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 6.5 points

The means of data collection are presented and accurate. Page citation for sample

information is provided.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

The means of data collection are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.

Page citation for sample information is provided.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

The means of data collection are presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation

for sample information is omitted.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

The means of data collection are presented. There are major inaccuracies or

omissions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The means of data collection are omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Inferential Statistics 13 points

Criteria Description

Clearly identify which hypothesis tests were used and the results.

5. Target 13 points

The inferential statistics thoroughly identify which hypothesis tests were used and

the results.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

The inferential statistics clearly identify which hypothesis tests were used and the

results.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

The inferential statistics generally identify which hypothesis tests were used and the

results but are lacking relevant detail.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

The inferential statistics identifying which hypothesis tests were used are

incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The inferential statistics identifying which hypothesis tests were used are omitted.

https://www.gce.com/

Assess the Appropriateness of Statistical Methods Used in This Study 19.5 points

Criteria Description

Provide rationale to support your response.

5. Target 19.5 points

Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used in this study is

thorough.

4. Acceptable 16.58 points

Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used in this study is

complete.

3. Approaching 14.63 points

Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used is included but lacks

relevant supporting details.

2. Insufficient 12.68 points

Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used is incomplete or

incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation of the appropriateness of statistical methods used is not included.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc

5. Target 6.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 5.2 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 5.2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 4.42 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 3.9 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 3.38 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 130 points

https://www.gce.com/