Neoclassical leader paper

Historical (Neoclassical) Leader Paper Write a 4-page response (APA 7, double-space) paper summarizing what you have learned from ONE of the identified leaders about their leadership and why these points are important to you personally. Describe the leader/writer’s 1) life, 2) his or her historical time, and most importantly 3) what you think made him or her a great leader (or thought leader). Use any one of the following neoclassical leaders:

• Abraham Maslow. • Chester Bernard, • Frederick Herzberg, • Henry Mintzberg, • Margaret Wheatley, • Mary Follet, • Peter Drucker, • Robert Greenleaf, • William Deming.

Please cite your references if you are using quotes (remember that I want to see your understanding of the quote, not just the quote – use quotes minimally). Suggestion: one quotation (citation) per page. Submit via Moodle assignment Dropbox. Label paper like this: [YOUR LAST NAME, FIRST NAME] – A3_Abraham Maslow (or whoever you use) This assignment is to be submitted in Moodle Dropbox before 11:59 p.m. March 12, 2021.

Grading rubric:

Emerging (0-64%) Developing (65-89%) Mastering (90-100%) Student responds to question(s) with a basic understanding of the question(s), little to no critical thinking, little to any application of ideas, little to any use of supporting evidence. Sequence of ideas is difficult to follow, no or vague thesis, no or minimal signposting, use of transition words and phrases, poor word choice, no or poorly used source text (doesn’t use “they say/I say” pattern). Language or APA flaws in three or more areas.

Student demonstrates some understanding of the question(s), some critical thinking, application of basic ideas, and use of evidence (citations and/or personal examples). Logical sequence of ideas that is fairly easy to follow; clear thesis, uses signposting, transition words and phrases, fairly good word choice, fairly well used source text (makes some use of the “they say/I say” pattern). Language or APA flaws in no more than two areas.

Student demonstrates exemplary understanding of the question(s), advanced use of critical thinking, application of ideas, and use of evidence (citations and/or personal examples. Exemplary organization of ideas that is very easy to follow; strong thesis, artful use of signposting, transition words and phrases, well-chosen words, very thoughtful use of source text (uses “they say/I say” pattern). No significant or notable language or APA flaws.