Public Health/ Health Evaluation &Implementation Program ASSIGN.

Swan250

HEVALRubricDetailMD4Assign1.html

Home >Nursing homework help >Public Health/ Health Evaluation &Implementation Program ASSIGN.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: USW1_PUBH_6475_Module_4_Article_Review_Worksheet_Rubric

	Fully Met	Partially Met/Good	Partially Met/Fair	Not Met
Correctly Identified the level of intervention used in the article	Points: Points Range: 16 (18.82%) - 16 (18.82%) The level of intervention used in the article is correctly identified Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 10 (11.76%) - 15 (17.65%) A level of intervention is identified And, The level identified was appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article But, The level of intervention identified is not the level used in the article Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) A level of intervention is identified But, The level identified is not appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article And, The level of intervention identified is not the level used in the article Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) No level of intervention is identified Feedback:
Correctly determined intervention strategy	Points: Points Range: 15 (17.65%) - 15 (17.65%) Provided a thorough summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 10 (11.76%) - 14 (16.47%) An intervention strategy is identified And, The strategy identified was appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article But, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) An intervention strategy is identified But, The strategy identified is not appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article And, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) No intervention strategy is identified Feedback:
Provided an assessment of whether the intervention strategy was appropriate	Points: Points Range: 15 (17.65%) - 15 (17.65%) Provided an assessment of the appropriatenes s of the intervention strategy And, Provided sufficient detail to support the assessment Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 10 (11.76%) - 14 (16.47%) Provided an assessment of the appropriateness of the intervention strategy But, Did not provide sufficient detail to support the assessment Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) Did not provide an assessment of the intervention strategy But, Did indicate whether or not the strategy was appropriate Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Did not provide an assessment of the intervention strategy And, Did not indicate whether the strategy was appropriate Feedback:
Summarized how the theory was used to develop the intervention	Points: Points Range: 16 (18.82%) - 16 (18.82%) Provided a thorough summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 10 (11.76%) - 15 (17.65%) Provided a summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention But, Some detail was missing Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) Provided a partial summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention But, Significant detail was missing Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Did not summarize how the theory was used to develop the intervention Feedback:
Provided an assessment of why the theory would or would not be a good fit for the proposed program	Points: Points Range: 16 (18.82%) - 16 (18.82%) Provided an assessment of the whether or not the theory would be appropriate And, Provided sufficient detail to support the assessment Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 10 (11.76%) - 15 (17.65%) Provided an assessment of the theory But, Did not provide sufficient detail to support the assessment Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) Did not provide an assessment of the theory But, Did indicate whether or not the strategy was appropriate Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Did not provide an assessment of the theory And, Did not indicate whether the strategy was appropriate Feedback:
Correct APA citation provided	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3.53%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3.53%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3.53%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3.53%) Feedback:
Correctly identified the primary health behavior theory used to develop the intervention	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4.71%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4.71%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4.71%) Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4.71%) Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Correctly Identified the level of intervention used in the article--

Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 16 (18.82%) - 16 (18.82%) The level of intervention used in the article is correctly identified Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) - 15 (17.65%) A level of intervention is identified And, The level identified was appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article But, The level of intervention identified is not the level used in the article Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) A level of intervention is identified But, The level identified is not appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article And, The level of intervention identified is not the level used in the article Not Met 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) No level of intervention is identified Feedback:

Correctly determined intervention strategy--

Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 15 (17.65%) - 15 (17.65%) Provided a thorough summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) - 14 (16.47%) An intervention strategy is identified And, The strategy identified was appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article But, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) An intervention strategy is identified But, The strategy identified is not appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article And, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Not Met 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) No intervention strategy is identified Feedback:

Provided an assessment of whether the intervention strategy was appropriate--

Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 15 (17.65%) - 15 (17.65%) Provided an assessment of the appropriatenes s of the intervention strategy And, Provided sufficient detail to support the assessment Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) - 14 (16.47%) Provided an assessment of the appropriateness of the intervention strategy But, Did not provide sufficient detail to support the assessment Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) Did not provide an assessment of the intervention strategy But, Did indicate whether or not the strategy was appropriate Not Met 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Did not provide an assessment of the intervention strategy And, Did not indicate whether the strategy was appropriate Feedback:

Summarized how the theory was used to develop the intervention--

Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 16 (18.82%) - 16 (18.82%) Provided a thorough summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) - 15 (17.65%) Provided a summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention But, Some detail was missing Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) Provided a partial summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention But, Significant detail was missing Not Met 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Did not summarize how the theory was used to develop the intervention Feedback:

Provided an assessment of why the theory would or would not be a good fit for the proposed program--

Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 16 (18.82%) - 16 (18.82%) Provided an assessment of the whether or not the theory would be appropriate And, Provided sufficient detail to support the assessment Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) - 15 (17.65%) Provided an assessment of the theory But, Did not provide sufficient detail to support the assessment Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) - 9 (10.59%) Did not provide an assessment of the theory But, Did indicate whether or not the strategy was appropriate Not Met 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Did not provide an assessment of the theory And, Did not indicate whether the strategy was appropriate Feedback:

Correct APA citation provided--

Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 0 (0%) - 3 (3.53%) Partially Met/Good 0 (0%) - 3 (3.53%) Partially Met/Fair 0 (0%) - 3 (3.53%) Not Met 0 (0%) - 3 (3.53%) Feedback:

Correctly identified the primary health behavior theory used to develop the intervention--

Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 0 (0%) - 4 (4.71%) Partially Met/Good 0 (0%) - 4 (4.71%) Partially Met/Fair 0 (0%) - 4 (4.71%) Not Met 0 (0%) - 4 (4.71%) Feedback:

Total Points: 85