sociology

2/12/2018 4182-63980

https://courseware.ku.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_21442_1&course_id=_270696_1 1/3

301‐302 Paper Rubric ‐ for Core Curriculum Goal Evalua�on

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Wow ‐4 Yep, you've

got it ‐ 3 Almost There ‐ 2 Not quite ‐ 1

Oops ‐

missed the

mark ‐ 0

State the

issue/relevant

legal rule in

ques�on 

100 %

At the outset of

the project, the

student states the

issue to be

addressed in a

clear and neutral

manner that

correctly iden�fies

the key rule or

rules of law at

issue. The

student's

expression of the

issue is

excep�onal either

in its precision or

in framing the

issue in a unique

way.

90 %

At the outset

of the

project, the

student

states the

issue to be

addressed in

a clear and

neutral

manner that

correctly

iden�fies the

key rule or

rules of law

at issue.

80 %

At the outset of

the project, the

student states the

issue to be

addressed in a

way that correctly

iden�fies the key

rule or rules of

law at issue. The

ques�on,

however, is

presented in such

a way that it lacks

clarity, neutrality,

or precision.

70 %

The student

a�empts to

iden�fy the

issue, but fails

to state the

key ques�on.

0 %

No clear

a�empt to

iden�fy

the issue.

Name

Descrip�on

Rubric Detail

Weight

20.00%

2/12/2018 4182-63980

https://courseware.ku.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_21442_1&course_id=_270696_1 2/3

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Wow ‐4 Yep, you've

got it ‐ 3 Almost There ‐ 2 Not quite ‐ 1

Oops ‐

missed the

mark ‐ 0

Evidence 1:

Assess

credibility of

evidence and

arguments

that support

your

conclusion 

100 %

The student raises,

fairly considers,

and cri�cally

evaluates all major

suppor�ng

argument. Sources

are cited

appropriately.The

student's

evalua�on of

evidence and

arguments is

excep�onal in that

it is par�cularly

systema�c and

methodical, or

especially

nuanced, or

especially

thorough.

90 %

The student

raises, fairly

considers,

and cri�cally

evaluates all

major

suppor�ng

arguments.

Sources are

cited

appropriately.

80 %

The student

raises, considers,

and evaluates

some suppor�ng

arguments. There

are problems

related to the

assessment of

evidence,

however, such as

failure to cite

sources, failure to

address major

suppor�ng

arguments, or

there are some

problems with

structure,

organiza�on, and

proof‐reading.

70 %

The student

either fails to

cri�cally

address many

key suppor�ng

arguments, or

the project

suffers from a

significant lack

of organiza�on

and structure.

0 %

Student

fails to

state

arguments

in support

of

conclusion.

Evidence 2:

Assess

credibility of

evidence and

arguments

against your

conclusion 

100 %

Student raises and

though�ully

addresses counter‐

arguments and

opposing

evidence. Student

goes beyond just

raising and

addressing

counterarguments,

grappling with the

rela�ve merits of

the two posi�ons.

90 %

Student

raises and

though�ully

addresses

counter‐

arguments

and opposing

evidence.

80 %

Student states

counter‐

arguments and

makes some

refuta�on, but

either the

statement of the

counterarguments

or the refuta�on

lack clarity or

careful

considera�on.

70 %

Student notes

counter‐

arguments but

makes no

response to

them.

0 %

Student

makes no

a�empt to

address

counter‐

arguments

and

opposing

evidence.

Weight

25.00%

Weight

25.00%

2/12/2018 4182-63980

https://courseware.ku.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_21442_1&course_id=_270696_1 3/3

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Wow ‐4 Yep, you've

got it ‐ 3 Almost There ‐ 2 Not quite ‐ 1

Oops ‐

missed the

mark ‐ 0

Evaluate the

influence of

Context and

assump�ons

100 %

Student analyzes

how the the case

affects and is

affected by

cultural/contextual

issues.

90 %

Student

addresses

some aspect

of how the

culture or

policy

implica�ons

relate to the

case.

80 %

Student operates

with background

assump�on of

context/cultural

impact but does

not address it

explicitly.

70 %

Important

culture/context

factors that

should be

considered are

ignored.

0 %

Student

does not

address

any

contextual

issues,

even

though

some

contextual

factors are

cri�cal to

the issue.

Conclusions

and related

outcomes 

100 %

Student's

conclusions are

clearly stated and

supported, and

excep�onally

nuanced, crea�ve,

or though�ul.

90 %

Student's

conclusions

are clearly

stated and

supported.

80 %

Student states

conclusions but

does not clearly

�e them to

evidence or

argument.

70 %

Student's

conclusions

either are not

clearly stated

or are not

supported.

0 %

Student

fails to

state a

conclusion.

Print   Close Window

Weight

5.00%

Weight

25.00%

View Associated Items