Assignment 7 Wald
There's a Fine Line Between Helpful and Harmful Authenticity Grant, Adam . New York Times , Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]. 27 Apr 2020:
B.6.
ProQuest document link
FULL TEXT When we express ourselves, let's not forget to think of others.
Waiting backstage for my name to be called, I started feeling the familiar flutter of butterflies. It caught me off
guard, because I thought I'd conquered my public speaking nerves. In the span of a decade, I'd gone from shaking
in front of a classroom to calmly delivering keynote speeches for audiences of 20,000. It was supposed to be
anxiety then, serenity now.
But something was different today: I was addressing the TED staff at their annual retreat. It was a whole room full
of people who judge the world's most electrifying speakers for a living. I had a dilemma: Should I acknowledge my
jitters out loud?
Being vulnerable with emotions is a form of authenticity. Authenticity is about being true to yourself -- expressing
your inner thoughts and feelings on the outside. Instead of wearing a mask, you let people see what's really going
on inside your head. When we can't do that, studies show it's stifling. The pressure to conform to other people's
expectations puts us in an emotional straitjacket, leading to stress and exhaustion. It can also undermine our
performance: When entrepreneurs pitch their start-ups and job candidates pitch themselves, pretending to be
someone they're not makes them nervous, interfering with the quality of their presentations.
The case against being fake is clear. But when it comes to being real, we have choices about which parts of
ourselves to reveal. And there may be times when we're better off being cautious about what we disclose.
In a recent study, researchers examined how striving to be authentic in job interviews influenced lawyers' and
teachers' odds of being hired. They measured authenticity by asking lawyers and teachers how strongly they
agreed or disagreed with statements like, "When interviewing for a job, I try to be honest about my personality and
work style," and, "It's important for an employer to see me as I see myself, even if it means bringing people to
recognize my limitations." The candidates who agreed with those statements were more likely to get job offers --
but only if their résumés had been rated in the 90th percentile or higher. For the vast majority of lawyers and
teachers, striving to be authentic didn't help their chances. And it actually hurt their chances if they were teachers
in the 25th percentile or below or lawyers in the 50th percentile or below.
[Like what you're reading? Sign up here for the Smarter Living newsletter to get stories like this (and much more!)
delivered straight to your inbox every Monday morning.]
Why did aiming for authenticity fail for most candidates and backfire for some? One possibility is that when job
applicants were focused on being authentic, they freely admitted their shortcomings. This didn't pose a problem
for lawyers and teachers with stellar résumés: Their strengths were already evident, so acknowledging
weaknesses signaled self-awareness. But for candidates who hadn't proven themselves, divulging flaws made
them seem incompetent and insecure. In a series of experiments, when people who were expected to be
competent confessed a weakness like struggling with attention to detail or a vulnerability like seeing a therapist,
they were respected less.
Authenticity without boundaries is careless. When we broadcast our limitations, we need to be careful to avoid
casting doubt on our strengths. This appears to be especially important for nondominant groups. Sadly,
experiments show that when leaders make self-deprecating jokes, they're judged as more capable if they're men
and less capable if they're women. Men's competence is typically taken more for granted, while -- unfairly -- women
have to work harder to prove themselves at work.
There's another factor that might explain why authenticity didn't serve some candidates well: They came across as
self-serving and self-absorbed. They were so focused on expressing themselves that they failed to show
enthusiasm for the job and curiosity about the organization.
"One of the problems with the 'bring your whole self to work' framing is that it's narcissistic," Herminia Ibarra,
professor of organizational behavior at London Business School, said on my TED podcast, WorkLife. "What about
taking an interest in the other person?" Sure enough, some evidence suggests that being authentic hurts people
who are low in concern for others: they're liked less and receive poorer performance reviews.
Authenticity without empathy is selfish. Of course we should be true to our values, but one of those values should
probably be caring about others.
As I stood backstage at the TED retreat, I started thinking about these guidelines. It was probably safe to be
vulnerable: I'd given two TED talks, so the audience would probably assume I was a decent speaker. If I was going
to admit my anxiety, I needed to make it about them -- not about me. Right before I walked onstage, instead of
launching into a story about the emotional roller coaster of my public speaking odyssey, I decided just to address
it with one line. As I walked onstage, I said, "Wow. If there's one thing more nerve-racking than speaking at TED, it's
speaking to TED."
The audience laughed, and it broke the ice: I immediately felt relaxed. Afterward, two audience members walked up
to tell me it made them feel appreciated. The fact that I was nervous about speaking to them made it clear that
they mattered to me. Authenticity is not just about expressing our own thoughts and feelings -- it's about
conveying our respect for others.
Adam Grant, an organizational psychologist at Wharton, is the author of "Originals." For more on effective
authenticity -- and more from Herminia Ibarra -- listen to WorkLife with Adam Grant, a TED original podcast on the
science of making work not suck. You can find WorkLife on Apple Podcasts, or on your favorite podcast platform.
Photograph
(PHOTOGRAPH BY Dominic Kesterton FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES) DETAILS
Subject: Authenticity; Public speaking; Audiences
URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/10/smarter-living/the-fine-line-between-helpful-
and-harmful-authenticity.html
Publication title: New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast); New York, N.Y.
Pages: B.6
Publication year: 2020
Publication date: Apr 27, 2020
Section: B
Publisher: New York Times Company
LINKS Linking Service
Database copyright 2021 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Contact ProQuest
Place of publication: New York, N.Y.
Country of publication: United States, New York, N.Y.
Publication subject: General Interest Periodicals--United States
ISSN: 03624331
Source type: Newspaper
Language of publication: English
Document type: News
ProQuest document ID: 2394753423
Document URL: https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/theres-fine-line-between-helpful-
harmful/docview/2394753423/se-2?accountid=14872
Copyright: Copyright New York Times Company Apr 27, 2020
Last updated: 2020-04-27
Database: ProQuest Central
- There's a Fine Line Between Helpful and Harmful Authenticity