eco question

profileshazuanzhe
Healthpoliciesaroundtheworld1.pptx

Health policies around the world

Expenditures Across OECD Countries

U.S. medical spending is highest in the world

Why?

What are the possible explanations?

Table 14.5 Health Systems Quality and Access Indicators

Canadian National Health Insurance: Medicare

Canada’s population distribution challenges health care delivery

Canada’s national health insurance system delivers high-quality medical care to all at about half of the per capita cost of U.S. health care

Canadian National Health Insurance: Medicare

Features:

Universal coverage

Health plans be publicly administered

Accessible

Comprehensive first-dollar coverage of all medically necessary services (no out-of-pocket)

Most Canadians have supplemental insurance that covers dental, vision and prescription drugs

Canadian National Health Insurance: Medicare

Financing of health care spending, 2013:

67.3% public sector

14.3% private insurance

13.6% patient out-of-pocket expenses

Wait lists for some medical services

Germany: history of sickness funds

Began in the 1800s with three guiding principles:

social solidarity

subsidiarity

corporatism

Germany: sickness funds Today

Universal coverage

All required to have health insurance

Those earning below threshold €53,550 (in 2014, about $60,000) must join a sickness fund; those earning above may get private insurance

About 15% (mostly civil servants) have comprehensive private insurance paid by their employers (giving better access)

Premiums for workers in sickness funds based on income, not age, dependents

Germany: Sickness Funds Today

Private insurance covers more, creates competition, spurs use of technology, ensures that care gap between public & private small

Germans receive high quality hospital & ambulatory care, prescription drugs, dental care, & disability income benefits; but public health services & psychiatric services minimal

Since 1977, 40 laws to control costs; copayments added; per capita spending fell

Switzerland

Swiss model has avoided link between health insurance coverage and employment, relying instead on personal responsibility

Insurance sold per individual; group & family plans do not exist

Health care spending 11% of GDP, 2nd only to U.S; medical resources highest in Europe

Permanent residents must purchase health insurance; if refuse, assigned to a plan

Over 30% purchase supplemental policy

Switzerland

Insurance provided by 67 private insurers operating on a not-for-profit basis; each canton governs own, & financed through taxes

Individuals pay community-rated premiums

Policies have 6 different deductibles

Two types of managed care plans, one like staff-model HMO, the other a GP network

Hospitals paid on a DRG basis

Switzerland

Three markets in Swiss health care: physicians compete for patients, insurers compete for customers, & insurers compete for primary care physicians

Swiss system is a reasonable alternative to government-run insurance plans in Europe:

Individual mandate to purchase private insurance with benefits defined by government

Coverage automatic at birth and guaranteed renewable, covering all pre-existing conditions

All expected to contribute something to purchase, and subsidized when cannot afford

A possible model for U.S. reform?

United Kingdom: National Health Service

Single-payer concept & limited supervision of providers kept administrative costs low, but from start, NHS underfunded and dominated by medical community

Health care delivery politicized; led to a series of crises (one every 3 years) between government & medical practitioners

A goal of NHS to eliminate inequalities, increase facilities in underserved regions, and restrict expansion in over-served regions, but these changes have met limited success

United Kingdom: National Health Service

Every citizen registered with a GP (general practitioner) ; GP is family doctor to patient, gatekeeper to specialists and hospitals

Anyone requiring “elective” procedure (not life-threatening) put on waiting list

2014, 2.99 million on hospital wait lists (5% of population)

Those who can buy private insurance do (12%)

Number of hospital beds has declined from 480,000 (1948) to <146,000 (2013)

1993, Thatcher reforms, instill market, but incentives weak; competition did not work

United Kingdom: National Health Service

Health organizations became independent NHS trusts; many GPs became fundholders

By 1995, health care provided through NHS trusts; a two-tiered system developed

1997: NHS reorganized for 5th time in 25 years

Blair reforms to remove market; placed GPs in primary care trusts (PCTs), each receiving a fully capitated budget to provide all health services for a defined population

10 year plan included promise of more hospitals, physicians, cleaner facilities, etc

United Kingdom: National Health Service

Health inequalities have widened since NHS; even so, public supports equal access by 2 to 1

2010 – Tory coalition plans to reform NHS, 6th time; 5 year plan to rebuild administrative structure of NHS:

Phase out primary care trusts by 2013

Money set aside for primary care will go to newly created GP consortia to purchase care like HMO

Plan short on details; will require much legislation

Risk of creating a tax funded system where small number of GP consortia control ½ of NHS budget

Public Satisfaction with Health Care Delivery Systems

.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#4472C4; } .MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Stroke { stroke:#4472C4; }