12 slides+Handout. Nursing work

1 | P a g e

NURS 809: Advanced Foundations for Nursing Practice

Fort Hays State University

Nursing Department

Assignment: Healthier Living in a Diverse Community Presentation for NURS 809

Assignment Purpose:

This major course assignment includes a professional verbal and written presentation,

followed by peer review, posted in the marked discussion forum. Students will explore,

apply, and analyze opportunities to build or expand planned health promotion and/or

disease prevention activities with measurable outcomes that influence communities

and/or aggregates/identified populations.

Assignment meets course outcomes:

1. Evaluate the efficacy of health promotion and maintenance activities using

interprofessional teams who communicate, collaborate, and/or consult to manage

and coordinate health care.

2. Synthesize methods, performance measures, and standards for the promotion of

high quality and safe patient care of diverse populations within the context of a

community and system.

3. Delineate leadership skills that emphasize ethical and critical decision making for

continuous quality improvement in patient health care.

Healthier Living Presentation Guidelines:

1. Each student is to select a project topic and post it in the marked discussion

forum by the due date.

2. In preparation for this project, each student should:

a. Healthier Living topic. Identify a project topic that will afford the opportunity to

explore, apply and analyze planned health promotion activities and/or disease

prevention with measurable outcomes for aggregates/identified populations.

b. Search the scholarly evidence. Study the state of science on the topic.

Additionally, compare potential change, leadership, measurement models,

and a continuous quality improvement (CQI) model applicable to your topic.

2 | P a g e

c. Plan your community project – develop a plan with execution (including

deliverables) and evaluation methodology.

d. Present this project in a professional voice recorded PowerPoint and

supplemental handout. Refer to grading rubrics for assignment details.

e. Supplemental handout: a) Title page (page 1); b) Abstract (adhere to APA

standards) (page 2); c) summarized/highlighted project plan (page 3 until

completed); d) All references in APA (pages 4 until completed).

f. Project Plan: systematic health quality improvement process, including:

1. Project foundation, with criteria of:

 Introduction/purpose

 Project plan defined with aims

o Population, methods, intended outcomes

o Measurement tools as applicable

 Value-based project attributes for project analysis

2. Project execution:

 Planned Implementation, including but not limited to:

o Consideration for environment & culture

 Triple aim: improve patient’s experience of care,

improve population health, and reduce per-capita cost

o Management plan

 Information technology

o Application of change process, nursing leadership, &

systematic process model (for example, Donabedian model)

o Application of 6 IOM aims (reference, see Harris, et al., 2016

course text, page 123+)

3. Project Evaluation:

 Explain anticipated measurable deliverables

o Align metrics with project aims and attributes

 Explain sustainment strategies using CQI

 Explain dissemination of your meaningful project

3. Final student oral presentations will be thirteen to sixteen minutes in duration,

posted as an accessible, professional recorded VoiceThread presentation in the

marked discussion forum for peer and instructor review.

4. Final presentations are to be completed in APA 6th edition.

3 | P a g e

Assessment Methods:

Assignment total points possible: 300 Poster assignment evaluation as follows:

1. Project topic; explain the project significance to you (10 points). Graded as 10 points completed or 0 points not completed correctly or tardy submission.

2. Complete professional handout and voice recorded VoiceThread presentation adhering to the assignment guidelines: 200 points, see the grading rubric.

3. Oral poster presentation, 13-16 minutes: 50 points, see grading rubric.

4. Peer evaluation, 40 points completed or 0 points not completed per assignment guidelines.

Professional VoiceThread (VT) & Handout Presentation Grading Rubric:

 This assignment must be submitted & accessible by the class for student credit.

 Submission information and tutorials on VoiceThread productions are located in the

assignment link.

Poster Criteria: Excellent, 50 points

Good, 47 points

Fair, 44 points

Needs improvement, 20 points

Quality of the Information, required for the professional handout and VoiceThread presentation:

1. Project Foundation:

 Introduction/purpose

 Project plan defined with aims

 Value-based project attributes for project analysis

Project foundation section is presented in adequate detail to meet assignment criteria in both the VoiceThread and handout.

Project foundation section is presented in nearly adequate (1 to 3 errors noted) detail to meet assignment criteria in the VoiceThread and handout.

Project foundation section is presented with 4 to 6 errors noted in either VoiceThread or handout.

Project foundation section is presented inadequately. Or Quality of the information does not meet other rubric evaluation criteria.

Quality of the Information, required for the professional handout and VoiceThread presentation:

2. Project Execution:

 Planned Implementation

 Consideration for environment & culture

 Management plan

 Application of change process, nursing leadership, & systematic process model

Project execution section is presented in adequate detail to meet assignment criteria in both the VoiceThread and handout.

Project execution section is presented in nearly adequate (1 to 3 errors noted) detail to meet assignment criteria in the VoiceThread and handout.

Project execution section is presented with 4 to 6 errors noted in either VoiceThread or handout.

Project execution section is presented inadequately. Or Quality of the information does not meet other rubric evaluation criteria.

4 | P a g e

 Application of 6 IOM aims

Quality of the Information, required for the professional handout and voice over PowerPoint (PPT) presentation:

3. Project Evaluation:

 Explain anticipated measurable deliverables

 Align metrics with project aims and attributes

 Explain sustainment strategies with CQI

 Explain dissemination of your meaningful project

Project evaluation section is presented in adequate detail to meet assignment criteria in both the VoiceThread and handout.

Project evaluation section is presented in nearly adequate (1 to 3 errors noted) detail to meet assignment criteria in the voice VoiceThread and handout.

Project evaluation section is presented with 4 to 6 errors noted in either VoiceThread or handout.

Project evaluation section is presented inadequately. Or Quality of the information does not meet other rubric evaluation criteria.

Design of PPT slides: design and graphics.

PPT design is professional. Minimum of 4 graphics are presented, are related to the assignment, are of high quality, and enhance reader interest or understanding.

PPT design is professional. Minimum of 4 graphics are presented, are related to the assignment, are of medium to low quality, and enhance reader interest or understanding.

PPT design is professional. Minimum of 4 graphics are presented, are related to the assignment, are of medium to low quality, and/or do not enhance reader interest or understanding.

Graphics are limited, are of low quality, and/or do not enhance reader interest or understanding. Or Graphics do not meet other rubric evaluation criteria.

References in the VT presentation and handout.

APA references are documented correctly.

APA references are documented nearly correct (1 to 2 errors).

APA references are documented mostly correct (3 to 5 errors).

APA references are deficient or do not meet other evaluation rubric criteria.

5 | P a g e

Professional Recording of PPT Presentation:

Peer Evaluation of recorded VT and Handout Rubric:

 This assignment must be submitted & accessible by the class for student credit.

Poster Evaluation Criteria: Excellent Good Fair Needs improvement

Quality of the Information, required for the professional handout and voice over PowerPoint (PPT) presentation:

1. Project Foundation:

 Introduction/purpose

 Project plan defined with aims

 Value-based project attributes for project analysis

Project foundation section is presented in adequate detail to meet assignment criteria in both the VoiceThread and handout.

Project foundation section is presented in nearly adequate (1 to 3 errors noted) detail to meet assignment criteria in the VoiceThread and handout.

Project foundation section is presented with 4 to 6 errors noted in either VoiceThread or handout.

Project foundation section is presented inadequately. Or Quality of the information does not meet other rubric evaluation criteria.

Grading feedback: (required to provide peer comments related to evaluation)

Quality of the Information, required for the professional handout and voice over PowerPoint (PPT) presentation:

2. Project Execution:

 Planned Implementation

 Consideration for environment & culture

 Management plan

Project execution section is presented in adequate detail to meet assignment criteria in both

Project execution section is presented in nearly adequate (1 to 3 errors noted) detail to meet assignment

Project execution section is presented with 4 to 6 errors noted in either VoiceThread or handout.

Project execution section is presented inadequately. Or Quality of the information does

Criteria: 40 35 30 25 10

Professional Communication

 Title & authors introduced

 Oral, professional recorded VT and handout presentation to class.

Both professional vocabulary and presentation style are used consistently (100%) throughout the presentation. Presentation time between 13 to 16 minutes.

Both professional vocabulary and presentation style are used consistently (100%) throughout the presentation. Presentation time greater than 16 minutes, but less than 20 minutes.

Both professional vocabulary and presentation style are used frequently (100%) throughout the presentation. Presentation time less than 13 minutes, but greater than 11 minutes.

Both professional vocabulary and presentation style are used frequently (> 90%) throughout the presentation. Presentation time between 13 to 16 minutes.

Presentation did not adhere to assignment guidelines OR It does not fit in the preceding assessment boxes.

6 | P a g e

 Application of change process, nursing leadership, & systematic process model

 Application of 6 IOM aims

the VoiceThread and handout.

criteria in the VoiceThread and handout.

not meet other rubric evaluation criteria.

Grading feedback: (required to provide peer comments related to evaluation)

Quality of the Information, required for the professional handout and voice over PowerPoint (PPT) presentation:

3. Project Evaluation:

 Explain anticipated measurable deliverables

 Align metrics with project aims and attributes

 Explain sustainment strategies

 Explain dissemination of your meaningful project

Project evaluation section is presented in adequate detail to meet assignment criteria in both the VoiceThread and handout.

Project evaluation section is presented in nearly adequate (1 to 3 errors noted) detail to meet assignment criteria in the VoiceThread and handout.

Project evaluation section is presented with 4 to 6 errors noted in either VoiceThread or handout.

Project evaluation section is presented inadequately. Or Quality of the information does not meet other rubric evaluation criteria.

Grading feedback: (required to provide peer comments related to evaluation)

Professional Communication

 Title & authors introduced

 Oral, professional recorded VT and handout presentation to class.

Both professional vocabulary and presentation style are used consistently (100%) throughout the presentation. Presentation time between 13 to 16 minutes.

Both professional vocabulary and presentation style are used consistently (100%) throughout the presentation. Presentation time greater than 16 minutes, but less than 20 minutes.

Both professional vocabulary and presentation style are used frequently (> 90%) throughout the presentation. Presentation time between 13 to 16 minutes.

Presentation did not adhere to assignment guidelines OR It does not fit in the preceding assessment boxes.

Grading feedback: (required to provide peer comments related to evaluation)