sports nutrition case study part 3
Case Study Part 3 Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
|
97 to 105 points* Created an accurate pre-event day menu and an accurate menu for the day of competition along with dietary analysis and hydration guide.
Menu & discussion takes into account micro and macro- nutrient recommendations: Calories, Grams of Carbohydrate, Grams of Protein, Grams or % Fat, Timing, Fluid needs
Nutrient adequacy and how to improve nutrient needs is excellently addressed.
Provided complete and accurate charts that were easy to follow AND coincided with report.
Submission addressed all necessary features from parts 1 and 2. Provided specific nutrition information and recommendations to help prevent, reduce, or alleviate issues and challenges presented in Part 2. Student demonstrated excellence based on their suggestions and rationale of each area identified
|
88 to 96 points* Created an acceptable pre-event day menu and a menu for the day of competition along with dietary analysis and hydration guide.
Menu & discussion adequately takes into account micro and macro- nutrient recommendations: Calories, Grams of Carbohydrate, Grams of Protein, Grams or % Fat, Timing, Fluid needs
Nutrient adequacy and how to improve nutrient needs is adequately addressed.
Provided adequate charts one could follow AND they coincided with report.
Submission addressed nearly all necessary features from parts 1 and 2. Provided specific nutrition information and recommendations to help prevent, reduce, or alleviate issues and challenges presented in Part 2. Student demonstrated acceptable competence based on their suggestions and rationale of each area identified |
1 to 87 points* An attempt was made to create pre-event day menu and a menu for the day of competition along with dietary analysis and hydration guide.
Menu & discussion partially takes into account micro and macro- nutrient recommendations: Calories, Grams of Carbohydrate, Grams of Protein, Grams or % Fat, Timing, Fluid needs
Explanation of nutrient adequacy and how to improve nutrient needs was attempted.
Provided incomplete or inaccurate charts that were confusing or unclear. They may or may not have coincided with report.
Submission did not adequately address necessary features from parts 1 and 2. Or did not provided specific nutrition information and recommendations to help prevent, reduce, or alleviate issues and challenges presented in Part 2. Student demonstrated partial competence based on their suggestions and rationale of each area identified |
0 points
|
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
|
41 to 45 points* Proper AMA formatting. Minimum of 2 peer-reviewed resources are cited. Excellent Spelling & grammar, and proper word count
|
38 to 40 points* 1-2 Errors in AMA formatting. 1-2 peer-reviewed resources Minor Spelling & grammar errors (<3-4) proper word count
|
1 to 37 points* 3 or more Errors in AMA formatting. 0-1 peer-reviewed resources Significant Spelling & grammar errors (>4) Word count is either significantly over or under proper amount.
|
0 points
|