Campaign/PPT
HCR 406 PowerPoint Rubric (Total points 50)
This rubric is the evaluation of the Health Campaign PowerPoint & Presentation.
|
Outcomes/Criteria |
Exceptional |
Satisfactory
|
Unsatisfactory
|
Poor
|
|
Points- total |
10 |
7.5 |
2.5 |
0 |
|
Includes Introduction with public health problem and learning objectives with evidence (research)
|
Includes 3-5 learning objectives aligned with the public health problem based on enough evidence.
|
Includes 2 learning objectives aligned with the public health problem based on some evidence. |
Includes 1 learning objective, not well aligned or introduced. A few evidences. |
No learning objectives or introductions. No evidence. |
|
Points- total |
20 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
|
Presentation covers all required topical criteria regarding: · Target audience · Conceptual Framework · Communication Channel · Message · Strategies · Materials · Conclusion (content accuracy)
|
Presentation includes detailed information relative to the topic. Slides cover all the topics. All facts were precise and explicit; utilized many types of credible resources to make project effective |
Presentation includes most of needed information relative to the topic. Slides cover at least 75 % of the topics. Mostly accurate; minor inconsistencies or errors in information. Citations sources could be improved. Utilized several types of resources to enhance the project |
Presentation includes minimal amount of needed information relative to the topic. Slides cover at least 50 % of the topics. Somewhat accurate; more than a few inconsistencies or errors in information or incomplete. Used minimal or a few unacceptable resources. |
Presentation includes less than minimal amount of needed information relative to the topic. Slides cover at less than 50 % of the topics. Minimal effort. Very inaccurate and/or incomplete; the facts in this project were misleading to the audience |
|
Points- total |
10 |
7.5 |
2.5 |
0 |
|
Delivery & Organization
|
Information presented in logical, interesting, and flowing sequence from introduction through conclusion & Presenter clearly and effective communicate topics and engage the audience |
Logical sequence of information allows the audience to follow presentation from introduction through conclusion & Presenter somewhat effectively communicate main points, and speaking and pace comfortable for audience |
Audience has difficulty following the presentation, unsupported assertions or illogical conclusions & Presenter’s pace is too slow or fast, jumps around, voice is low or unclear or fails to elaborate on key points |
Presentation has no logical sequence of information, content is disorganized, irrelevant, or inaccurate & Presenter speaks too quietly, mumbles, and has many non-word or filer interjection (um, uhh, ahh, well, so, etc) |
|
Points- total |
5 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
Visual Aids |
Clear and creative visual aids enhance the presentation, reinforce key points, and engage the audience |
Presentation has relevant visual aids that provide evidence to support assertions |
Limited visual aids support presentation |
No visual aids used. |
|
Timeliness/ APA formatting/grammar |
Timely submission, 2-3 grammar or APA errors in citations or reference page, 7 or more references included |
Timely submission 4 or less grammar or APA errors, 5 or less references included. |
Timely submission, 5 grammar or APA errors 3 or less references included. |
Late submission without prior notification or arrangements, more than 5 APA or grammar errors. No reference page or citations. |
|
**Note: If your team does not meet at least satisfactory levels, up to 7.5 points will be deducted from your final grade derived from categories above. |
||||
|
|
Exceptional=0 |
Satisfactory=0 |
Unsatisfactory=-5 |
Poor=-7.5 |
|
Workload |
The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members. |
The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person |
The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work. |
The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work. |
How will we submit/present our project ?: You will create a PPT presentation describing:
• What your project is and the scientific evidence in support of your project (topic)
• Why you all decided to create this project in the way that you did (Purpose & Objectives)
• Describe the intended audience of your project and why you chose this audience (Audience)
• Describe the proposed intent of health communication message & Channels
• Describe a rational for the chosen communication strategy
• Describe the theoretical model/framework guiding the development of your health communication message
• Discuss strengths/limitations of your chosen health communication strategy
• Describe any results of the project if it were presented publically (not a requirement, but encouraged)
• Include an APA style reference list of your citations (you need at least seven)
• Describe each group members’ roles and contributions on the project
• Embed or insert the hyperlink of the actual creative product within the presentation