Ethics and Law-Healthcare
An103960
HCM3004EthicsandLawforAdministrators_Week3_Davis_A.docxRunning head: ETHICS AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS 1
ETHICS AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS 8
Ethics in COVID-19 Pandemic and Legal Considerations
Angelica F Davis
South University Online
HCM3004 Ethics and Law for Administrators
Week 3, Project
Professor Sherri Spencer
5/17/2020
There have been many strategies that have been in place to carter for how resources have been allocated for the needed response in times of pandemics. The COVID-19 answers the have been used in the counter for the epidemic have had the drawback that has resulted in the hospital having to undergo pressure financially. In such cases, the ethical problems need to be checked in the best manner by the application and the utilization of the best in terms of planning for the resources. (Emanuel, et al. 2020). Such is in line with the resources getting to be allocated to the people in the best manner following all the legal in addition to the ethical considerations which have been in place to carter for such within times of pandemics.
The strategies that have been used in the allocation for the resources have been utilized and formed an essential part in the distribution of the resources there need to be put into a book within a time when there is a pandemic. Goals within the health care systems are to be capable of allocating resources in the best and most fair manner. However, having the chance to get a determination of whatever can be described, to be honest, has been many issues that have led to the rise in many debates. Arguments have neem emerging whereby people have disagreed with the meaning of the fair value in the intent of such. There has been the need for all health care facilities within the globe to be capable of allocating resources to the needy, which is affordable in the case of health care provision systems. In this case, resource allocation among all has been rendered to form a vital ground.
Questions have come up within the resource allocation in the COVID-19 pandemics on whether the strategies which have been applied in the resent state can use tactics that have been implemented within the previous epidemics. Such arguments have formed ethical platforms that need to be highlighted and review to get the test feedback in terms of such. Reasons which have been linked to resource allocation in addition to the need for an exploration of the activities and the issues within the resource allocation in the pandemic for COVID- 19. There is, therefore, a need that requires diverse frameworks in decision-making platforms for allocating resources during the pandemic period. An example of such is the case where the present pandemic COVID- 19 has been observed to have diverse and various effects on older people, starting from the ages of 36. In this case, a prioritized aspect is needed for the allocation of the resources .in the problem which is in line with resources allocation all the shareholders are interested with having the opportunity to apply the best decision which is ethical within any situation whereby consideration will have more impact on the affected parties.
The governing structures which assist in the resource allocation on the pandemic are inclusive of responsibilities that the hospitals are faced within the healthcare provision for all the people who have been affected by the problem. Services are needed, which are dependent upon; however, the pandemic has become. There has been an increase in the number of people who have been affected by the epidemic. In this case, the number of people in need of ventilators has been on the rise in addition to the people who are in intensive care. Under such, there have also been legal aspects; there have necessitated hospitals to be capable of thoroughly undertaking healthcare treatment for the patients.
With the rise in the number of patients within the healthcare facilities, the experts in the facilities are faced with dilemmas that are related to healthcare rationing. Such can lead to the suing of doctors. Countries such as the United States can sue a doctor for healthcare rationalizing. (Emanuel, et al. 2020). He is need for all patients to be treated in the best manner as well as observing ethical issues in addition to consideration in the laws; however, the cases in place. Additionally, there have been contracts within health facilities which have stated the need for responsibilities for the treatment of a patient within a system whereby deals such as the monopolistic locations come in. Also, ethical consideration has noted that doctors are obligated to treat patients in times of emergencies.
In terms of ethical responsibilities, doctors are obligated by law in times of a pandemic to treat all patients because such is a moral aspect; however, a case whereby survival remains uncertain. Yet within the pandemic situations, there is a need for experts in healthcare systems to undertake considerations of application of the principle in addition to prioritizing the care for the patients who have a better chance for survival. Some of the arguments which come up are in line with issues such as fair resource allocation and health care rationing, which are justifiable.
Ethical considerations, in addition to the legal review within the countermeasures, which are made up of individual tools within the system, can be different. The demand for healthcare in the aspects of the services within the present pandemic situation has been resulting in the increases. The spotlight can be in light on the critical; care needed for the issues in place. The demand has made issues within the acre facilities to later the ways and channels used by the experts in the raising of the concerned, which are ethical. (Hübner, et al. 2020). Under such placing employees within fields which they cannot perform well since they are unfamiliar with such. Health care experts have been made prone to many risks, such as getting affected by the disease. Such levels of the threat have been stated to be vital for the most affected patients who carry most particles that transmit the disease.
Within facilities that are associated with health care facilities, there is a need for the exploration of diverse values and some costs; there can be in line with issues such as vaccines. These can assist the use of such drugs in times when the control for the pandemic has become necessary. In this case, when the experts find a vaccine that can be gauged to be effective in the treatment of the disease. In this issue, the vaccine will need to prioritize the application of the vaccine within the people who are at the highest risk levels. Ethical considerations within such are the aspects which are in line with the question which states what utilization inn the random allocation which is made legal in the regulated care resources which have been allocated to the people who have been affected. Under such an instance, there is a consideration that all the sick will be awarded the vaccine on an equal basis. However, resource allocation, which is in line with the ventilator, can be deemed to be different and contrasting, whereby some people might have the hence to get more benefits as compared to others.
The addition in the numbers of the people infected by the COVID 19 pandemics has been on the rise. Many countries have expected elevations in numbers of the sick, whereby the intensive care population within the facilities will be on the increase in the care within the hospital where they are located—hence situating which lead to the medical experts having the choice to sacrifice lives of the individuals whereby the benefit will be on the person connected. Such can cause death if a ventilator has been withdrawn under such circumstances; the person whose ventilator has been removed losses their life. This case will put the experts under legal issues, which will need to be checked as stipulated by section 212 within the codes for criminal offenses.
Within the health care systems, the goals in the investments that have been instituted in the order have been in line with the elimination of all risks present within the public platforms. There have been principles within the system that have assisted in making the network adhere to the best. Such are the likes of the values of equality, in addition to risk which haves formed a significant grasp in getting to the nest decisions that the people require in terms of their priorities which have been put forward in the case of the resources being limited and their need for the people to have access to such. The risks within the healthcare system are made possible to be eliminated since there is the presence of many investments in place. However, from this perspective, one of the risks within the care system can be deduced to form significant impacts in comparison to others. Under these instances. (Mannelli,2020). Resource allocation has the utmost importance and needs to keep in line with adherence to the risks in place.
Decisions which are in place for the resource access needs to experiment equality when the people are being issued with the resources within the facilities. There is need for all the people in the facilities to get the best treatment which is fair to all unless their presence for enough evidence which can make space for contrasts on the concepts of resource prioritizations and allocation.in addition where there is allocation of resource to individuals, there is need for the givers to allocate the resources overlooking issues relating to the ethnicity, race gender or any other aspect which can lead to the emergence in the differentiation among the individual in need of the services for care in a health facility.
Justifications also live with resource allocation whereby the associate parties need to understand issues relating to provision there are in line with the benefits and the chance for the absence of harm in the services. (DePergola, 2020). Under such an instance, an individual need to understand concepts related to the population, whereby resource allocation is of utmost importance. Under such an example can be stated to be present within the present pandemic, whereby there can be a short supply of the vaccines for the pandemic. Such will outline an ethical need for health care experts.
The ideas within resource allocation are determinants of the people who are prone to risk. There is the efficiency that comes along with resource allocation. In such a case then, there is the probability of an opportunity that will bring about impotence within the economics platforms in addition to ethical crucially of the facts. Having a better system within healthcare will mean that the system has presented the best in terms of the care. Within the pandemic, there is a need for experts to respond in the best way. With such, the experts can be allocated more priority in the allocation of the resources. This is an attribute to the inputs which the experts had into the person as well as the contributions which the workers in the care sector performed in the fight for the health crisis.
In the intent to get the best decision when there is a need for allocation of services, doctors will be mandated to put into consideration issues such as the cost, age brackets for the people in need, the criteria applicable in the medical platforms. Getting an equal treatment for all the sick has been made possible by the ethics committee. (Hübner, et al. 2020). Also, there have been issues that have been stated to need clarification, such as unequal treatment for people who are about the race as well as ethnic requests. As well as regulations in line with such topics as unequal care given such as the age need amendment will help to look after the treatment from a balanced perspective.
Within the allocation of resources, a primary concept has been used, which is in line with the first come first serve protocols. There is a higher likability to allocate resources within the population which are most affected. In the case of a disease, giving the vaccines is assign to the younger people, which in turn will help in getting to understand the level of risks. Getting liable within the utility, in addition to prioritization, needs consideration. (Mannelli, 2020).
References
DePergola, P. A. (2020). Ethical Guidelines for the Treatment of Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).
Hübner, J., Schewe, D. M., Katalinic, A., & Frielitz, F. S. (2020). Legal Issues of Resource Allocation in the COVID-19 Pandemic-Between Utilitarianism and Life Value Indifference.
Emanuel, E. J., Persad, G., Upshur, R., Thome, B., Parker, M., Glickman, A., … Phillips, J. P. (2020). Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine. doi: 10.1056/nejmsb2005114
Mannelli, C. (2020). Whose life to save? Scarce resources allocation in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Medical Ethics. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106227
