coursework

AES coursework 1 by Abdulhadi S H A Alshati

Submission dat e : 30- Jan- 2019 09:04 AM (UT C+0000) Submission ID: 100002355 File name : 07 85- 1819_94 26998_114 16002_AES_co ursewo rk_1.do cx Word count : 24 60 Charact e r count : 13261

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30% SIMILARIT Y INDEX

10% INT ERNET SOURCES

4% PUBLICAT IONS

28% ST UDENT PAPERS

1 12% 2 4% 3 3% 4 3% 5 2% 6 1% 7 1% 8 1% 9 1%

AES coursework 1 ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Leeds Beckett University St udent Paper

www.rieti.go.jp Int ernet Source

Submitted to University of Sussex St udent Paper

Submitted to Study Group Worldwide St udent Paper

Submitted to University of Lincoln St udent Paper

Submitted to Macquarie University St udent Paper

Submitted to University of Houston System St udent Paper

Submitted to University of Ulster St udent Paper

www.theparliamentmagazine.eu Int ernet Source

10 1% 11 <1% 12 <1%

Exclude quo tes Of f

Exclude biblio graphy Of f

Exclude matches Of f

www.hsj.gr Int ernet Source

Submitted to Sim University St udent Paper

"Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in the Middle East and North Af rica (MENA)", Springer Nature, 2018 Publicat ion

FINAL GRADE

/100

AES coursework 1 GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

PAGE 1

Comment 1

autho rity?

Comment 2

I'm no t sure this is relevant to so urce evaluatio n.

Comment 3

Ho w will yo u use it in yo ur essay?

PAGE 2

Comment 4

Did yo u get this so urce o nline? If so yo u sho uld ref erence it as a website.

Comment 5

What do yo u mean?

Comment 6

Which is?

Comment 7

T heref o re relating to develo ped co untries?

Comment 8

Plagirised

PAGE 3

Comment 9

Go o d

Comment 10

Go o d

PAGE 4

Comment 11

Currency relates to published date no t the autho r.

Comment 12

Go o d

PAGE 5

Comment 13

Full essay questio n needed

Comment 14

T here is no mentio n o f develo ped and develo ping co untries/

Comment 15

Which co untries?

Comment 16

T o o general.

Comment 17

Acco rding to yo ur intro ductio n, this sho uld be in the intro ductio n.

Comment 18

T his is a heading no t a

to pic sentence

PAGE 6

Comment 19

What is the impact o f replacing humans? Do es this ref er to develo ped o r develo ping co untries?

Comment 20

No t a to pic sentence

Comment 21

inf o rmal

Comment 22

Do yo u mentio n this in yo ur essay?

Comment 23

Yo u sho uld ref er to develo ped and develo ping co untries.

PAGE 7

Comment 24

Academic? Reliable?

Comment 25

Yo u canno t use this in Harvatrd Style.

Comment 26

last accessed date?

Comment 27

Ref erence as a website

Comment 28

T here are quite a f ew .co m websites and even a magazine. Co nsider if yo u sho uld use them f o r an academic essay.

RUBRIC: GRADEMARK RUBRIC CW1 IFY_IY1

SELEC / EVAL.

0 - 1

2 - 3

4 - 5

6 - 7

8 - 10

UNDERST ANDING

0 - 1

2 - 3

4 - 5

6 - 7

8 - 10

USE OF SOURCE

0 - 1

2 - 3

4 - 5

1. What type o f so urces have yo u cho sen? 2. Why have yo u cho sen the so urce?

1. Po o r and/o r inappro priate literature/material selected; required number o f so urces no t included. 2. No attempt to evaluate the reliability o f so urces.

1. Predo minantly po o r and/o r inappro priate material selected with selectio n appearing to be rando m. 2. Weak / f aulty evaluatio n o f the reliability o f the so urces.

1. Acceptable so urces / material selected, tho ugh may be lo wer quality in so me areas. 2. Evaluatio n o f the reliability o f the so urces present, but pro vides minimal detail which is weak, f aulty o r repetitive in so me areas.

1. Reliable so urces selected o verall; o ne o r two so urces may be o f lo wer quality. 2. So und evaluatio n o f the reliability o f so urces. Reaso ning and detail may be clearer f o r so me so urces than o thers.

1. All so urces are reliable and appro priate f o r academic purpo ses. 2. Clear and so und evaluatio n o f the reliability o f all so urces pro vided.

1. Ho w is the so urce relevant to yo ur title? 2. Have yo u identif ied usef ul po ints in the text?

1. T exts are unco nnected – no o bvio us f o cus f o r the reading. 2. Demo nstrates no discernible kno wledge o r understanding.

1. T exts are o nly generally linked to the to pic; the relevance to the title is unclear. 2. Demo nstrates little o r co nf used understanding o f co ntent.

1. T exts are relevant to the research to pic and title, tho ugh link may be less clear in places. 2. Demo nstrates general kno wledge o f so me areas but may lack detail.

1. Relevance o f the texts to the research to pic and title is clear. 2. Demo nstrates go o d understanding o f the relevant material and issues.

1. Relevance o f the texts to the research to pic and title is explicit and clear. 2. Demo nstrates tho ro ugh understanding o f the relevant material and issues.

1. Ho w well develo ped is yo ur essay o utline? 2. Ho w will yo u use the so urces in yo ur wo rk?

1. T he o utline is largely unclear o r missing. 2. Unclear ho w so urces will be used in the essay.

1. T he o utline is o nly partly develo ped. 2. Largely unclear ho w so urces will be used to suppo rt po ints in the research essay.

1. Mo st aspects o f the o utline are clear, but f urther develo pment is required. 2.

6 - 7

8 - 10

REFERENCING

0 - 1

2 - 3

4 - 5

6 - 7

8 - 10

Indicatio n o f ho w so urces will be used in the essay is generally clear, but may lack detail o r relevance in places.

1. All aspects o f the o utline are clear tho ugh so me parts may require f urther detail o r develo pment. 2. Clear indicatio n o f ho w so urces will be used in research essay in the o utline; so urces appro priate to suppo rt po ints.

1. All aspects o f the o utline are clearly and f ully develo ped. 2. T he value and use o f all so urces f o r the research essay is clear in the o utline.

Ho w clear and accurate are yo ur ref erences?

0 MARKS No ref erences included

1 MARK Majo rity o f citatio ns / ref erences missing o r very unclear.

2 MARKS In- text citatio ns and end o f text ref erences included but with o missio ns o r erro rs.

3 MARKS In- text citatio ns and end o f text ref erences generally clear and accurate; may co ntain o ccasio nal mino r erro rs.

4 MARKS In- text citatio ns and end o f text ref erences co nsistently clear and accurate.