gun control body

profilemaxstudent
GunControlAnnotatedBibliography2.docx

Running head: GUN CONTROL 1

GUN CONTROL 6

More Guns More Violence: Gun Control is the Answer

More Guns More Violence: Gun Control is the Answer

Branstetter, G. (2015, March 31). Why we should ban guns on college campuses. Retrieved from The Daily Dot: https://www.dailydot.com/via/banning-guns-college-campuses-elliot-rodger/

This article argues that campus should be the last place that individuals are allowed to carry weapons. What causes gun-related violence? The answer is simply guns. Guns are the lethal weapons that assist criminals in carrying out their killing sprees within and outside the campus. For that reason, a person who owns a gun is likely to die from in the same way a car-owner is likely to die from a car crash. However, some risk factors such as drugs and alcohol contribute to the prevalence of these gun-related shootings since alcohol impairs judgement. According to the Center for Disease Control, a third of the gun homicides involved alcohol and 60% of these victims were intoxicated at the time of the killing. In conclusion, colleges should come up with their own gun control policies because guns do not make people safer. This article is relevant for research because it highlights the need to ban guns especially on campuses.

Goral, T. (2012, April). Guns on Campus. University Business, pp. 42-44.

This article does not focus on the second amendment that allows citizens to bear arms. Rather, the focus is on the debate on whether students should or should not be allowed to bear arms in colleges. For that reason, this article highlights some of the arguments for and against the use of guns on campuses. First of all, proponents of guns in schools argue that the bad people will still get access to firearms even with gun control measures in place. Moreover, gun control denies victims the right to self-defense. However, opponents of gun-use in campuses argue that since campuses offer safe environments, introducing guns is a recipe for disaster. According to James Kenny an Associate Professor of Fairleigh Dickinson University in New Jersey, people do not have time to use their guns during a rampage shooting. Thus, alternative solutions should be adopted instead of arming people. This article is vital for research because it recognizes that guns do not deter crimes and are in fact a recipe for disaster.

Gregory, S., Wilson, C., Park, A., & Jenkins, A. (2018, April 2). What We Can Do to Stop It. Time, pp. 32-35.

Gun-related violence is highly prevalent in the US, especially in schools. According to this article, Americans are 25times likely to die from gun homicides than other citizens from developed countries. In 2016, 97gun deaths were reported daily based on The Annals of Internal Medicine report. For that reason, the authors emphasize that gun control should not be perceived as a public battle. Rather, adequate measures should be taken to stop gun violence. Some of the proposed measures are that the minimum purchasing age for a gun should be raised from 18 to 21 and that a license should be given to all gun owners, Gun restraining orders should be issued to unfit individuals and doctors should educate patients about the safety of guns. Most importantly, immunity should be denied to gun owners and manufacturers should be held liable for their products to ensure they make safer products. This article is relevant for research because it supports the need for gun control and proposes solutions to end gun violence.

Nuwer, R. (2018, April 18). What if all guns disappeared? . Retrieved from BBC : http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20180417-what-would-happen-if-all-guns-disappeared

Fewer guns mean less gun-related deaths. According to this article, approximately 500000 people globally lose their lives annually simply because of gun-related incidences. In the US, citizens own 300 to 350 million guns which increase the gun fatalities to 25 times higher in the US compared to other nations. For that reason, a reduction in the number of guns will decrease the number of deaths experienced in the nation. This article states that if guns disappeared, the number of suicides will also decline an example being in Australia. In fact, the firearms ban in Australia reduced the gun-related homicides by half and suicide rates reduced by 80%. Also, reduction in firearms in the US will translate to a reduction in the violence cases between police officers and the civilians. Most importantly, gun-control will reduce the financial burden that goes towards covering the medical costs of victims involved in gun-related violence. This article is vital for research because it highlights the gains of gain control in the United States.

Schuppe, J. (2016, October 25). More Guns on Campuses Won't Make People Safer, Researchers Say. Retrieved from NBC News: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/more-guns-campuses-won-t-make-people-safer-researchers-say-n671911

Mass shootings in colleges are on the rise. Consequently, a heated a debate has emerged as to whether carrying guns in schools helps or hurts the school community. Based on this debate, this article argues that more guns on campuses actually do more harm than good. Having concealed guns or firearms in colleges only raises the risk of gun-related homicides in institutions that are meant to offer a haven for students. According to researchers from Johns Hopkins, most of the mass shootings such as the Virginia Tech in 2007 occur where people carry guns but the majority are not in a position to use these guns in self-defense. For that reason, the argument that people are safer when everybody is carrying guns around is a façade. This article is crucial for research because it emphasizes that laws which allow the right to carry guns and arms in actual sense increase gun-related violence in society.

Siebel, B. J. (2008). The Case Against Guns on Campus. Civil Rights law Journal, 18(2), 319-337.

When the Virginia Tech Mass Shooting took place on April 16, 2007, supporters of gun use lobbied for more guns on campuses. Be that as it may, Would the students in the once gun-free campuses free safe knowing their fellow students carried guns around with such abandonment? Also, would the parents of these students feel safe in enrolling students in such institutions? The answer is a resounding no. For that reason, this article argues that more guns are not the answer to the horrific mass shootings that are rampant in the American Campuses. Risk factors that increase gun-related violence in schools include drugs and alcohol, mental issues and risks of suicide, gun theft as well as accidental shootings on campus. Most importantly, more guns in campus deny students a safe learning environment for carrying their studies. This article is important for research because it supports the need for gun control since guns increase the risk of gun-related violence on campus.

Webster, D., & Daniels, R. (2016, October 16). Allowing guns on campus will invite tragedies, not end them. Retrieved from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/allowing-guns-on-campus-will-invite-tragedies-not-end-them/2016/10/21/a1679f9e-8992-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html?utm_term=.9955807e3eb9

There is a common belief that more guns in campus results to less violence. However, this article argues otherwise and emphasizes that more guns increase gun-related violence in the learning institutions and society at large. Although proponents of the right-to-carry gun laws argue that more guns will deter the prevalent active shootings, this article indicates that when these surprise shootings occur, people are not able to protect themselves. Moreover, even the most trained officers are not able to act in such situations. For that reason, the right to carry gun laws do not deter rampage shootings, especially in campuses. In conclusion, majority of gun related incidences do not arise from active shooting. Rather the presence of firearms is lethal and contribute to increased suicides, disputes and accidental shootings. This article is vital for research because it emphasizes that the presence of guns is a recipe for disaster in society because they increase deaths and accidents.