business statistics

profilestudent567
Guidetofindingzcoresoftheassignmentupdatedammended.docx

This document just discusses the zscores for datasets used in the assignment due week 10 Finding the zscores for the assignment is only part of assignment, for complete instructions to the assignment refer to the top of moodle.

Some summaries of the dataset used Section 1 of the computing assignment Including zscores The section 1 dataset consists of a population of 100,000 people split into 10,000 samples of size 10 the variables in the dataset are “income” and annual contribution to super, So you show the relationship between the variables graphically using a scatterplot and regression. You need to suppose that someone wants to predict the contribution of a person with income $200,000.

The population of 100,000 people

The scatter plot below shows the relationship between the variables

income” and “annual contribution to savings” for 100,000 people so 100,000 points,

If income 200,000 predict annual contribution to be 27,000

Using the whole population all 100,000 points the regression line is predicted annual contribution y=0.1347*x+22 so if the predicted annual contribution is 0.1347*200,000+22=27,016

Since there are 10,000 samples there 10,000 sample predictions (estimates) for the annual contribution if income is $200,000 , The average of the 10,000 predictions (estimates) is $27,000 and the standard deviation is $2,100

Sample 700 A Sample of 10 people from a population of 100,000 people

The scatter plot below shows the relationship between the variables

income” and “annual contribution to savings” for 10 people so 10 points,

Note that the regression line y= 0.1318x+947 goes through the middle of the points You do not have to calculate the regression line yourself, the computer does it for you The predicted contribution when income is 200,000 is predicted annual contribution =0.1318*200,000+947=27307

Since the zscore (27307-27000)/2100= 0.15 , P(Z<0.15)=0.5581 So if you compare sample 700 to the 10,000 samples then you expect rank Predicted rank = P(Z<zscore)*10000=0.5581*10,000=5581

Sample 701 Another Sample of 10 people from a population of 100,000 people

The scatter plot below shows the relationship between the variables

income” and “annual contribution to savings” for 10 people so 10 points,

predicted annual contribution =0.142*200,000+2852=25548

Since the zscore (25548-27000)/2100= -0.69, P(Z<-0.69)=0.2446 So if you compare sample 701to the 10,000 samples then you expect rank Predicted rank = P(Z<zscore)*10000=0.2446*10,000=2446

Theory not required to do the assignment , zscores make sense if you look at the list of 10,000 estimates.

sample

slope

intercept

predicted y for x=200000

zscore=(y-mean)/stdev

actual rank

lowest to highest

1

0.1187

-699

23041

-1.89

287

327

0.1772

-6732

28708

0.81

7946

328

0.1085

3482

25182

-0.87

2016

329

0.1561

-3005

28215

0.58

7208

330

0.1269

1404

26784

-0.10

4675

331

0.1811

-2685

33535

3.11

9996

332

0.096

6064

25264

-0.83

2148

333

0.1138

4011

26771

-0.11

4648

334

0.1347

385

27325

0.15

5682

335

0.1315

1446

27746

0.36

6425

336

0.112

1530

23930

-1.46

774

337

0.1515

-3298

27002

0.00

5067

338

0.0955

5483

24583

-1.15

1287

339

0.1414

-3281

24999

-0.95

1784

10000

0.1424

-1142

27338

0.16

5705

For sample 331 , the sample estimate is 33535 this is clearly higher than the other estimates and it has a zscore of 3.11, its rank (lowest to highest is 9996 so it is the 99.96th percentile.

P(Z<3.11) = 0.9991 is close to the percentile but better, Since there is a list of 10,000 estimates the predicted rank is 10,000*0.9991=9991

Some summaries of the dataset used Section 2 of the computing assignment (including zscores) ( the population and some samples)

A population of 200,000 investors

Investment type

Lost money

Made money

Total

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

56079

224246

280325

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

11927

107748

119675

Investment type

Proportion that

Lost money

Proportion that

Made money

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

=56079/280325 =0.2 =20%

224246/280325 = 0.8 =80%

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

=11927/119675 =0.0997=9.997%

1077548/119675=0.9003 = 90.03%

0.2

So the difference in proportions is -=0.2-0.0997=0.1003

Since there are 4000 samples you can find 4000 samples estimates of - the average is 0.1 and the standard deviation is 0.074

Sample 700 A sample of 100 people from the population of 200,000 people

Investment type

Lost money

Made money

Total

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

14

60

74

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

3

23

26

Investment type

Proportion that

Lost money

Proportion that

Made money

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

=14/74 =0.1892 =18.92%

60/74 =0.8108 =81.08%

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

=3/26 =0.1154 =11.54%

23/26=0.8846 = 88.46%

Using the sample the estimated difference in proportions is 0.1892-0.1154=0.0738 So the zscore for that estimate is (0.0738-0.1)/0.0743=-0.35 P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<-0.35) =0.3632 So when you compare sample 700 to the 4000 other samples you predict the rank to be 0.3632*4000=1453

Sample 701 Another sample of 100 different investors from the population of 200,000 people

Investment type

Lost money

Made money

Total

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

16

58

74

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

4

22

26

Investment type

Proportion that

Lost money

Proportion that

Made money

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

=16/74 =0.2162 =21.62%

58/74 =0.7838 =78.38%

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

=4/26 =0.1538 =15.38%

22/26=0.8462 = 84.62%

Using the sample the estimated difference in proportions is 0.2162-0.1538=0.0624 So the zscore for that estimate is (0.0624-0.1)/0.0743=-0.51

Using wolfram alpha P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<-0.51) =0.305 So when you compare sample 701 to the 4000 other samples you predict the rank to be 0.305*4000=1220

Sample 449 Another sample of 100 different investors from the population of 200,000 people

Investment type

Lost money

Made money

Total

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

7

63

70

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

3

27

30

Investment type

Proportion that

Lost money

Proportion that

Made money

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

=7/70 =0.1 =10%

63/70 =0.9=90%

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

=3/30 =0.1 =10%

27/30=0.9 = 90%

Using the sample the estimated difference in proportions is 0.1-0.1=0 So the zscore for that estimate is (0-0.1)/0.0743=-1.34 Using wolfram alpha website P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<-1.34) =0.09 So when you compare sample 449 to the 4000 other samples you predict the rank to be 0.09*4000=360

Sample 2994 Another sample of 100 different investors from the population of 200,000 people

Investment type

Lost money

Made money

Total

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

7

63

70

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

6

24

30

Investment type

Proportion that

Lost money

Proportion that

Made money

Risky investment plan (mainly shares)

=7/70 =0.1 =10%

63/70 =0.9=90%

Safer investment plan (mainly use the bank)

=3/30 =0.1 =10%

27/30=0.80 = 80%

Using the sample the estimated difference in proportions is 0.1-0.2=-0.1 So the zscore for that estimate is (-0-0.1)/0.0743=-2.68 Using wolfram alpha website P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<-2.68) =0.00368 So when you compare sample 2994 to the 4000 other samples you predict the rank to be 0.00368*4000=15

Theory you do not have to discuss this in the assignment

p1-p2 =0.1003 is positive

The 368 out of 4000 of the sample Estimates of p1-p2 are negative (less than 0) These samples are giving the opposite conclusion that the population , In the population the high risk investments have a higher probability of losing money however 368 of the sample make you give the opposite conclusion.

The proportion of samples that give the wrong conclusion is 368/4000=0.092

Using properties of the normal distribution , you can get a similar (but better answer) the estimates have a mean of 0.1 and standard deviation 0.0743 so an estimate of 0 has a zscore of (0-0.1)/0.0743=-1.34

P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<-1.34) = 0.09

In other words the estimate of 0 is the 9th percentile, this was found out using zscore and the normal distribution .

Some summaries of dataset used in Section 3 of the computer assignment (including zscores) ( the population and some samples )

A population of the returns of 200,000 investors

Note that return is express as a decimal, so a return of 0.05 is a return of 5%

Investment type

Number of investors

Average return

Standard deviation

Safe type (mainly use the bank)

140209

µ1=0.0350

0.0032

Risky type (mainly use the stock market)

59791

µ2=0.0606

0.0951

So the difference in population means µ1- µ2=0.035-0.606=-0.256

There are 2000 samples so you can find 2000 estimates of µ1- µ2 =-0.0256

The average of the 2000 estimates of µ1- µ2 =-0.0256 The standard deviation of the 2000 estimates µ1- µ2 =0.0173

Sample 700 One sample of the returns of 100 investors from the population of 200,000 investors

Investment type

Number of investors

Average return

Standard deviation

Safe type (mainly use the bank)

72

0.0345

0.0028

Risky type (mainly use the stock market)

28

0.0850

0.0849

So the difference in the sample means =0.0345-0.085=-0.0505 The zscore of this estimate =(-0.505- -0.0256)/ 0.0173=-1.44 using wolframalpha.com P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<-1.44)=0.075 So if you compare sample 700 to the 2000 other samples you expect it to have rank 2000*0.075=150

Sample 701 Another sample a different sample of 100 investors from the population of 200,000 investors

Investment type

Number of investors

Average return

Standard deviation

Safe type (mainly use the bank)

67

0.0350

0.0031

Risky type (mainly use the stock market)

33

0.0618

0.1150

So the difference in the sample means =0.035-0.0618=-0.0268 The zscore of this estimate =(-0.0268- -0.0256)/ 0.0173=-0.07 using wolframalpha.com P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<-0.07)=0.471 So if you compare sample 701 to the 2000 other samples you expect it to have rank 2000*0.471=942

Sample757 Another sample a different sample of 100 investors from the population of 200,000 investors

Investment type

Number of investors

Average return

Standard deviation

Safe type (mainly use the bank)

73

0.0355

0.0031

Risky type (mainly use the stock market)

27

0.0256

0.0942

So the difference in the sample means =0.0355-0.0256=0.0099 The zscore of this estimate =(0.0099 - -0.0256)/ 0.0173=2.05 using wolframalpha.com P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<2.05)=0.98 So if you compare sample 757 to the 2000 other samples you expect it to have rank 2000*0.98=1960

Sample244 Another sample a different sample of 100 investors from the population of 200,000 investors

Investment type

Number of investors

Average return

Standard deviation

Safe type (mainly use the bank)

77

0.0352

0.0031

Risky type (mainly use the stock market)

23

0.0352

0.0950

So the difference in the sample means =0.0352-0.0352=0 The zscore of this estimate =(0 - -0.0256)/ 0.0173=1.48 using wolframalpha.com P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<1.48)=0.93 So if you compare sample 244 to the 2000 other samples you expect it to have rank 2000*0.93=1860

Theory you do not have to discuss this in the assignment

µ1- µ2  =0.1 is negative

The 136 out of 2000 of the sample Estimates of µ1- µ2  are positive (less than 0) These samples are giving the opposite conclusion that the population , based on the population the risky investments have a higher average but some samples say it has a lower average

The proportion of samples that give the wrong conclusion is 136/2000=0.068

Using properties of the normal distribution , you can get a similar (but better answer) the estimates have a mean of 0.1 and standard deviation 0.0743 so an estimate of 0 has a zscore of (0-0.1)/0.0743=1.48

P(Z<zscore) = P(Z<1.48) = 0.93 so 93% of the estimates will be below 0 so the proportion and give the correct answer but 7%=0.07 will give the wrong answer.

In other words the estimate of 0 is the 93rd percentile, this was found out using zscore and the normal distribution

Some summaries of dataset used in Section 4 of the computer assignment ,including zscores ( the population and some samples )

A population of 200,000 people is asked if they support a proposed change to the Business

no

Yes

Total

Count of do you support proposed change?

80,000

120,000

200,000

population proportion of people that say yes is p=120,000/200,000=0.6

Since the sample has been split into 1000 samples there are 1000 sample estimates The average of the 1000 sample proportions is 0.6 The standard deviation of the 1000 sample proportions is 0.0357

Sample 700, A sample of 185 people are asked if they support the change. (the sample is from the population of 200,000 given above)

no

Yes

Total

Count of do you support proposed change?

86

99

185

Sample proportion of people that say yes is =99/185 =0.5351

So the zscore =(0.5351-0.6)/0.0357=-1.82 P(Z<zscore)=P(Z<-1.82)=0.0344 So if we compare sample 700 to the 1000 other estimates then we expect the rank to be 0.0344*1000=0.0344=34

Sample 701, sample of a 190 people are asked if they support the change So a different group of people (a slightly bigger sample of 190) are selected from the population of 200,000

no

Yes

Total

Count of do you support proposed change?

71

119

190

Sample proportion of people that say yes is = 119/190 =0.6263

So the zscore =(0.6263-0.6)/0.0357=0.74 P(Z<zscore)=P(Z<0.74)=0.7704 So if we compare sample 700 to the 1000 other estimates then we expect the rank to be 0.7704*1000=0.7704