Homework

profileGwadys
Guidelines.docx

Guidelines:

1.  Individual assignment.

2. Submit an original work addressing the topic and questions provided and other relevant factors you may think of beyond the questions provided here.

3. No title page is required.  Provide your name(s), the course and section number, and date in the header of the first page and subsequent pages.

4. If you use material from outside sources (i.e. the Internet), be sure to cite the source in the body of the paper where you use the information and provide an APA-style reference at the end of the paper.

5. The expected word count is 400-500 words, excluding the information in the header and any references.

6. A plagiarism checker is used, so be sure to cite and reference any outside source material.

7. You are writing with a professional audience in mind, so be sure to use a professional tone.  Do not use a familiar tone as you might use when discussing this with a friend.

Government Employs Backdoor Searches

AACSB standards:  Social and Ethical Issues, Technology in Society

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) conducts foreign covert operations, counterintelligence operations, and collects and analyzes foreign intelligence for the president and his staff to aid in national security decisions. The National Security Agency (NSA) is responsible for global monitoring, collection, and processing of information for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conducts domestic counterintelligence and counterterrorism operations in addition to its role as the lead law enforcement agency in the country.

These three agencies have implemented sophisticated programs to capture, store, and analyze electronic communications. The Downstream program (formerly called PRISM) extracts data from the servers of nine major American Internet companies including AOL, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Paltalk, Skype, Yahoo, and YouTube to obtain direct access to audio, video, photographs, emails, documents, and connection logs for each of these systems. The Upstream program taps into the infrastructure of the Internet to capture the online communications of foreigners outside the United States while their communications are in transit. The leaders of the intelligence agencies argue that these programs are essential to fighting terrorism. The agencies can also provide a dozen or more examples of how use of the data gathered by these programs has thwarted the efforts of terrorists around the world.

The programs are authorized by Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act which authorizes surveillance of any foreigner overseas, provided the purpose is to obtain “foreign intelligence.” The Act loosely defines “foreign intelligence” to mean any information that “relates to” the conduct of foreign affairs. This broad definition means that the target being surveilled need not be a terrorist. The target needs only to be thought to have information that is relevant to the government’s foreign intelligence objective—whatever that may be.

The process of gathering foreign electronic communications necessarily means the incidental capture of many conversations involving an American (who may be here in the United States) and a foreign target. They may well be having a totally innocent communication with a foreign friend, relative, or business partner who is not suspected of any wrongdoing whatsoever. The total number of Americans’ communications “incidentally” collected since the inception of Section 702 is well into the millions.

Section 702 also allows the government to pool all the messages it intercepts into a giant database and then search the database, including conversations involving Americans— without a warrant. Warrantless surveillance of communications between Americans and foreigners is known as a “backdoor search” because it effectively evades other provisions of United States law that require an individualized warrant or court order for access to such data. The agencies are authorized to conduct unlimited warrantless backdoor searches of those communications for information about Americans or individuals located in the United States during any investigation. The agencies are only required to obtain a warrant to view American’s data if the investigation is not related to national security.

There is a rigorous process that law enforcement agents must go through to wiretap a phone with three key requirements that clearly distinguishes this method of gathering data from Downstream and Upstream. First, before beginning the wiretap, agents must prove to a judge that they have probable cause to believe that tapping a specific phone will help them solve serious federal crimes such as terrorism, money laundering, or drug trafficking. Second, a time limit must be defined for the wiretapping to start and end; it cannot go on forever. Third, the wiretapping is limited only to those conversations that are likely to yield evidence against the suspect.

There are also major differences between the way Downstream and Upstream programs collect data and the way data is gathered under an ordinary search warrant. Downstream and Upstream gather all the data there is to be collected and create a source of data that can be queried to find evidence of a crime. If a police department obtains a search warrant to search a house for illegal drugs, agents can lawfully enter the house and search every room. But after finding (or failing to find) the drugs, they cannot then go rummaging through file cabinets for evidence of sex-trafficking and then seize computers to search for evidence of tax evasion, even though the officers are lawfully present in the house. They must get a separate warrant to conduct each search in advance of any search.

Critical Thinking Questions

1. Many people believe that the lack of evidence that an American is engaged in wrongdoing is hardly a compelling justification for a warrantless search of his or her communications. To the contrary: if the intelligence agencies do not have probable cause to suspect criminal activity, they have no business reading Americans’ emails and listening to their phone calls. Imagine that you agree with this position, what changes do you feel are needed to FISA Section 702?

2. Others believe that our intelligence agencies should capture all the data possible to protect us from terrorists and if, while doing this, a source of data is created that can be used in criminal cases, so much the better. Imagine that you agree with this position, what changes do you feel are needed to FISA Section 702?

3. Do you believe that the Downstream and Upstream programs are examples of tipping the scales of justice in favor of security over privacy? Justify your answer.

Sources: “Surveillance Techniques: How Your Data Becomes Our Data,” Domestic Surveillance Directorate, https://nsa.gov1.info/ surveillance, accessed August 10, 2018; “NSA Stops Certain Section 702: Upstream Activities,” NSA Statement, April 28, 2017, https://www.nsa. gov/news-features/press-room/statements/2017-04-28-702-statement. shtml; “Upstream vs. PRISM,” Electronic Frontier Foundation, https:// www.eff.org/pages/upstream-prism, accessed August 10, 2018; “Backdoor Search,” Electronic Frontier Foundation, https://www.eff.org/pages/ backdoor-search, accessed August 10, 2018; Robyn Greene, “Americans Wanted More Privacy Protections. Congress Gave Them Fewer.”, New America, January 26, 2018, https://www.newamerica.org/oti/articles/ americans-wanted-more-privacy-protections-congress-gave-them-fewer; Laura Hautala, “NSA Surveillance Programs Live On, In Case You Hadn’t Noticed,” c/net, January 19, 2018, https://www.cnet.com/news/nsasurveillance- programs-prism-upstream-live-on-snowden; and “Guide to Section 702 Value Examples October 2017, https://www.dni.gov/files/ icotr/Guide-to-Section-702-Value-Examples.pdf.

Submitting your Assignment

1. Click the  Submit Assignment button.

2. Click the  Choose File button and upload your file.

3. Click the  Submit Assignment button to submit.

Rubric

Writing Rubric Template

Writing Rubric Template

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus

10 to >9.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

All required components of the assignment are complete or go beyond requirements. The focus on the assignment directly aligns with the prompt and is appropriately narrow for the scope of the assignment.

9 to >7.0 pts

Fully Meets Expectations

All required components of the assignment are complete. The focus on the assignment mostly aligns with the prompt, with some minor sidesteps. It may be narrow enough for the scope of the assignment, but at times is too broad or vague.

7 to >4.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

Some required components of the assignment are not complete. The focus on the assignment somewhat aligns with the prompt, with sidesteps. It is often too broad, hesitant to directly address the question, for the scope of the assignment.

4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Many of the required components of the assignment are not complete. The focus on the assignment hardly aligns or does not align with the prompt, with major sidesteps, and is too broad or vague, not directly addressing the question.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

10 to >9.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

The work demonstrates that the student fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.

9 to >7.0 pts

Fully Meets Expectations

The work demonstrates that the student, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.

7 to >4.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

The work demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course, but is missing important connections or misunderstanding some aspects of the content.

4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The work does not demonstrate that the student has understood and applied concepts learned in the course.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

10 to >9.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Writing shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of main points. Unity clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic.

9 to >7.0 pts

Meets Expectations

For the most part, the work ties together information smoothly with an understanding of connections. Paper flows with only some disjointedness, but ultimately follows logical idea sequences and patterns.

7 to >4.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Author's writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

4 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The work does not tie together the knowledge learned in the course. It does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships between ideas.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment

10 to >9.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Exceptionally well- presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well- developed, supported with specific evidence & facts, as well as examples and specific details.

9 to >7.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Well-presented and argued; ideas are mostly detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.

7 to >4.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

Main points are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature.

4 to >0 pts

No Marks

Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions & Grammar

5 to >4.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

No spelling or grammar mistakes.

4 to >3.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Minor spelling & grammar mistakes that do not impede the flow and comprehension of the work.

3 to >2.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

Noticeable spelling & grammar mistakes that somewhat impede the flow and comprehension of the work.

2 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. The mistakes severely impede the flow and comprehension of the work.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting & Citations

5 to >4.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

The work is formatted according to directions. It is professionally presented with clear organization. Outside sources are properly cited with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Meets Expectations

The work is mostly formatted according to directions. It is professionally presented with minor questions about organization. Outside sources are cited with minor errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

The work is somewhat formatted according to directions with obvious inconsistencies. It lacks a professional presentation or clear organization. There is an attempt to cite outside sources, but with many errors.

2 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The work is not formatted according to directions or lacks formatting altogether. It lacks a professional appearance. Outside sources are not cited or contain major errors or misleading information.

5 pts

Total Points: 50