Nuclear Medicine

Guideline:

I am looking for a current analysis of your topic!

Look for trustworthy academic sources (no quackery, and please

go beyond Wikipedia).

Guideline: 500 words + figures and calculations + references.

Papers will be evaluated on the accuracy of your discussion of

the topic and its relevance to the course.

Cover the individual topics plus unify them!

Time guideline: 5 minutes per person.

Presentations will be evaluated on content and relevance to the

course (60%), coherence with the group (20%), and style (20%)

My research of nuclear medicine treatment is focusing on Role of PET/CT for precision medicine in lung cancer.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5709134/

include but not limited to this reference

This is the feedback from prof of my proposal:

Overall, I think your group has done a good job dividing up the topic. However, because you've divided by body part (for the most part) rather than technology, several of these topics may lead to overlap, so please make sure that you coordinate so that everyone includes some distinct nuclear physics content in their presentation. I also want to share comments on individual topics with all of you. You do not have to update your posts, but you can if you want to. 

These are largely imaging techniques, which makes them more appropriate (and an overlap area) with the Imaging group that will present right before you. However, there is clearly a relationship between imaging and treatment for many precision techniques, so I think you could make that argument.