stattistics

profileMParra
GroupProject_CritiqueScoringRubric1.pdf

MSN5250 Group Project Part A Critique Scoring Rubric

Group Name:

Adapted from: Oral Presentation Rubric - ReadWriteThink. (n.d.). Homepage - ReadWriteThink.

Retrieved June 11, 2018 from http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/printouts/oral-

presentation-rubric-30700.html

CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 Points

Content (x5)

Demonstrates full knowledge of the critique process. Provides clear explanations of all critique elements; supports conclusions/ideas with evidence from the study. Provides both positive and negative critique.

Demonstrates good understanding of the critique process. Provides explanations of majority of critique elements; partially supports conclusions/ideas with evidence from the study. Provides some positive mixed with mostly negative critique.

Demonstrates limited understanding of the critique process. Provides explanations of some of critique elements; limited support of conclusions/ideas with evidence from the study. Provides mostly negative critique.

Demonstrates little to no understanding of the critique process. Does not provide explanations of critique elements; does not support conclusions/ideas with evidence from the study. Provides only negative critique.

Organization

Information is well- organized. Presentation flows nicely.

Information is organized. Presentation flows fairly well.

Information is fairly organized. Presentation does not flow well.

Information appears to be disorganized. Presentation is difficult to understand.

Critical Analysis

Analyses and conclusions are accurate, detailed, insightful, valid, and consistent with data.

Analyses and conclusions are consistent with data.

Analyses and conclusions are mostly correct.

Analyses and conclusions are unclear or inaccurate.

Comprehension

Able to accurately answer almost all questions posed by colleagues about the topic.

Able to accurately answer most questions posed by colleagues about the topic.

Able to accurately answer a few questions posed by colleagues about the topic.

Unable to accurately answer questions posed by colleagues about the topic.

Preparedness

Completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed.

Well- prepared and rehearsed.

Somewhat prepared but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking.

Does not seem at all prepared to present.

Timing

Presentation is 18-20 minutes long.

Presentation is 15- 17 minutes long.

Presentation is 12- 14 minutes long.

Presentation is less than 12 minutes or greater than 20 minutes.

Group Member Participation

Consistently participated in in development of the project

Frequently participated in in development of the project

Sometimes participated in in development of the project

Never participated in development of the project