Research
HSCO 511
Group Leading Proposal Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Below Expectations |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
|
Content: 70% |
|||||
|
Content |
33 to 35 points · Proposal discloses all required aspects of the proposed meeting in sufficient depth & detail. · Proposal adheres to all parameters provided for the group leading assignment. · Proposal demonstrates careful planning with attention to group context, setting, participants, timeframe, goal, & purpose. |
30 to 32 points · Proposal discloses required aspects of the proposed meeting in acceptable depth & detail. · Proposal adheres to the parameters provided for the group leading assignment. · Proposal demonstrates some planning with attention to group context, setting, participants, timeframe, goal, & purpose. |
27 to 29 points · Proposal includes some required aspects of the proposed meeting & is somewhat developed. · Proposal adheres to most parameters provided for the group leading assignment. · Proposal demonstrates some planning, but lacks attention to group context, setting, participants, timeframe, goal, or purpose. |
1 to 26 points · Several required content areas are missing or are poorly described & developed. |
0 points |
|
|
|
Structure: 30% |
|||||
|
Organization; Grammar & Mechanics; Format & Style
|
14 to 15 points · Well organized with an engaging introduction, a logic progression of ideas & transitions that are clear & maintain flow of thought. · Focused & concise with main points sufficiently developed. · Spelling, grammar, punctuation, & capitalization is correct. · Sentences are coherent, complete, clear & varied. · Choice of words, tense & tone is appropriate. · Title page, header, margins font, spacing & heading are consistent with APA style. · References & in-text citations correspond & are correct. |
13 points · Generally well organized with a good introduction, progression of ideas & transitions that are clear & maintain flow of thought. · Focused & concise with main points somewhat developed. · Spelling, grammar, punctuation, & capitalization is acceptable. · Sentences are generally coherent, complete & clear. · Choice of words, tense & tone is acceptable. · Title page, header, margins font, spacing & heading are generally in APA style. · References & in-text citations correspond & are correct. |
11-12 points · May lack an engaging introduction, a logic progression of ideas and/or transitions that are clear & effective to maintain flow. · Focus may be lacking & main points needing development. · Spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization is incorrect. · Sentence structure needs to be developed. · Word choice, tense, or tone may be problematic. · Title page, header, margins font, spacing & heading are inconsistent with APA style. · References & in-text citations may conflict or be incorrect. |
1 to 10 points · Organization is poor. · There may be a lack of focus; ideas may be vague, confusing or underdeveloped. · Multiple writing, grammar, or sentence structure errors are present. · The paper does not adhere to APA format.
|
0 points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
/50 |