capstone case analysis
rkswl
GroupCaseAnalysis2GradingRubric1.docxBUSI 400
Group Case Analysis 2 Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Case Analysis Content – Executive summary |
9 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
8 to 6 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
5 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – Existing mission, objectives, and strategies |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – A new mission statement |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – SWOT (TOWS) analysis |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – SPACE Matrix |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – BCG Matrix |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – IE Matrix
|
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – Competitive Profile Matrix |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – EFE Matrix |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – IFE Matrix |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – Alternative Strategies |
9 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
8 to 6 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
5 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – Recommendations of Strategies |
10 to 9 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
8 to 7 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
6 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – Forecasted Ratios |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – Pro-Forma Financial Statements |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Case Analysis Content – Action Timetable/Agenda |
5 points Provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
4 points Mostly provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
3 to 1 points Somewhat provides appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas. |
0 points Does not provide appropriate, thoughtful, in-depth critique and analysis for the chosen company based on the following key areas.
|
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Professionalism |
17 to 15 points Entire submission is presented in a professional manner and addresses the specific question(s) posed using proper support and citations. |
14 to 12 points Submission is presented in a mostly professional manner and mostly addresses the specific question(s) posed using for the most part proper support and citations. |
11 to 1 points Submission is presented in a somewhat professional manner and somewhat addresses the specific question(s) posed using some proper support and citations. |
0 points Submission is not presented in a professional manner or addresses the specific question(s) posed and does not use proper support or citations. |
|
Format and Grammar |
20 to 18 points Proper grammar, spelling, and current APA (when appropriate) are used throughout the entire submission. |
17 to 14points Submission contains 0 - 2 noticeable errors in grammar, spelling, or current APA format throughout the submission. |
13 to 1 points Submission contains 3 - 4 noticeable errors in grammar, spelling, or current APA format throughout the submission.
|
0 points Submission contains more than 4 noticeable errors in grammar, spelling, or current APA format throughout the submission. |
|
|
|
|
Total |
/125 points
|
*Please remember to review the peer evaluation process and how that impacts your group project grade.
