Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study

profilerupali
group6feedback.doc

PROJ6009 T1, 2020 Assessment 2A Marking And Feedback Form

Presenter / Group: __Group 6 - _Daljeet and Rupali ___________________________ Date: ___04/08/2020___

Category

Scoring Criteria

Points

Score

Organisation

(15 points)

The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience.

5

3.5

Information is presented in a logical sequence.

5

4

Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references.

5

4

Content

(50 points)

Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.

5

3

Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience, eg mapping, processes etc

10

9

Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories

15

9

Critical analysis included on the selected case study, lesson learnt recorded

15

10.5

There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation.

5

5

Presentation

(35 points)

Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).

5

5

Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.

10

10

Good language skills and pronunciation are used.

5

4

Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting.

10

9

Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.

5

3

Total Points

100

79

Feedback and Commentary

The presentation informative but took more time than required because of which it was little dragging.

Assessor Name/Group: 5