Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study
PROJ6009 T1, 2020 Assessment 2A Marking And Feedback Form
Presenter / Group: __Group 6 - _Daljeet and Rupali ___________________________ Date: ___04/08/2020___
|
Category |
Scoring Criteria |
Points |
Score |
|
Organisation (15 points) |
The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience. |
5 |
3.5 |
|
|
Information is presented in a logical sequence. |
5 |
4 |
|
|
Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references. |
5 |
4 |
|
Content (50 points) |
Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation. |
5 |
3 |
|
|
Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience, eg mapping, processes etc |
10 |
9 |
|
|
Material included is relevant to the case study and reflect to the BPI theories |
15 |
9 |
|
|
Critical analysis included on the selected case study, lesson learnt recorded |
15 |
10.5 |
|
|
There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation. |
5 |
5 |
|
Presentation (35 points) |
Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.). |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. |
10 |
10 |
|
|
Good language skills and pronunciation are used. |
5 |
4 |
|
|
Visual aids are well-prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting. |
10 |
9 |
|
|
Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. |
5 |
3 |
|
Total Points |
100 |
79 |
|
|
Feedback and Commentary |
The presentation informative but took more time than required because of which it was little dragging. Assessor Name/Group: 5 |