Annotated Bibliography

2

Annotated Bibliography

Group #5: Mobile HCI

Pramesh Thapa Magar

Nirmay Patel

Shah Omer Hussain Syed

Manishanthan Annam

University of the Cumberlands, Kentucky

Human-Computer Inter & Usability (ITS-536-B05) – Second Bi-Term

Dr. Kondo Litchmore

August 14, 2022

Annotated Bibliography

Jumisko-Pyykko, S. & Vainio, T. (2010). Framing the context of use for mobile HCI. International Journal of Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmhci.2010100101

The research paper continues the provide a better understanding of the context of use for mobile HCI by studying the previous papers. It shows the attributes associated with mobile contexts and their linkage to technical, social, and physical components. The paper describes the five different components with their subcomponents and properties to represent the context of use for mobile human-computer interaction (Jumisko-Pyykko & Vainio, 2010).

Kjeldskov, J. & Graham, C. (2003). A review of mobile HCI research methods. International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45233-1_23

The paper reviews the various research methods used to research the field of mobile HCI and lists the drawbacks of the current research methods. The paper mentions the bias in the present research methods such as case studies, field studies, survey research, and others in system making and lack of research. The papers will give a new way for researchers to conduct research on mobile HCI for future research (Kjeldskov & Graham, 2003).

Kjeldskov, J. & Paay, J. (2012). A longitudinal review of mobile HCI research methods. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices (pp. 69-78). https://doi.org/10.1145/2371574.2371586

The research paper shows the change in the research in the mobile HCI field over ten years. It compares the research techniques from 2003 and 2010 and shows the analysis of changing the techniques over time. Earlier the research was more dependent on engineering and applied research, whereas present research involves case studies, surveys, field studies, and analysis of each factor. There are multiple methods used for research in current times compared to the decade before (Kjeldskov & Paay, 2012).

Parhi, P., Karlson, A., & Bederson, B. B. (2006). Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices. In Proceedings of MobileHCI 2006. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/1152215.1152260

The research paper shows the study in two phases to decide the perfect size for small touch screen devices for one-handed thumb use. In the first phase, the study focuses on the smaller tasks such as clicking buttons and selecting radio buttons and checkboxes. In the second phase, the study focuses on widgets-related tasks such as multiple tapping such as form filling. The study uses 9.2 mm screen size and 7.7 mm screen size and finds that 9.2 mm screen size is very large for one-handed thumb use devices (Parhi et al., 2006).

Tamminen, S., Oulasvirta, A., Toiskallio, K., & Kankainen, A. (2004). Understanding Mobile Contexts. International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45233-1_3

The research paper shows the study of 25 urbanites of different groups such as mothers, aged people, and people between the age of 10 to 19 to understand their perspective regarding the mobile context. The paper also includes the various instances of overviewing factors of multitasking, providing solutions to navigational problems, and problems related to design for mobile contexts (Tamminen et al., 2004).