multimedia presentation

Quality of Reflection/Analysis or Argumentation (YOUR IDEA)

• Not just opinions

–

but reflection that is informed by what you have learned in the course • Strength and relevance of commentary •

Demonstrate solid and mean

ingful reflection [insights, observations, what learned] • Analysis is NOT description. Be certain your content is

evaluative, analytical, generative of new behaviors/strategies for self or others

25

Clarity and Depth of Connection to Literature (YOUR K

NOWLEDGE)

• Makes meaningful connections to research, theory, and literature from interpersonal relations literature/and course content

? • Cogent,

pointed, specific connections to the readings in the course • Demonstrates accurate grasp and application of

the literature • Though briefer

than a full “academic paper,” presentation still offer sufficient substance

–

development of ideas.

25

Quality of Content (YOUR PRODUCTION)

• Not rambling, but coherent, well

-

organized, well

-

edited, content • Is concise,

but still developed enough, to make sense and have impact •

Grammar, syntax, and other mechanics are strong throughout the entries • Encourages reading/viewing by others

–

engaging style and

language that is appropriate • Sources cited appropriately using

verbal citations

25

Audience

-

Centered (YOUR RELEVANCE)

• Project assists novice audience in understanding interpersonal communication/relations •

Inviting

–

Interesting

–

Creative

–

of significance

and value to reader/listener • Meaningful and clear explanations/analysis to audience (reader/viewer) who has never read this

course

material. • Intent of project readily apparent to the viewer/listener

–

and has potential to impact their learning • Inclusion of written

audience/project summary

Quality of Reflection/Analysis or Argumentation (YOUR IDEA)

• Not just opinions – but reflection that is informed by what you have learned in the course • Strength and relevance of commentary •

Demonstrate solid and meaningful reflection [insights, observations, what learned] • Analysis is NOT description. Be certain your content is

evaluative, analytical, generative of new behaviors/strategies for self or others

25

Clarity and Depth of Connection to Literature (YOUR KNOWLEDGE)

• Makes meaningful connections to research, theory, and literature from interpersonal relations literature/and course content? • Cogent,

pointed, specific connections to the readings in the course • Demonstrates accurate grasp and application of the literature • Though briefer

than a full “academic paper,” presentation still offer sufficient substance – development of ideas.

25

Quality of Content (YOUR PRODUCTION)

• Not rambling, but coherent, well-organized, well-edited, content • Is concise, but still developed enough, to make sense and have impact •

Grammar, syntax, and other mechanics are strong throughout the entries • Encourages reading/viewing by others – engaging style and

language that is appropriate • Sources cited appropriately using verbal citations

25

Audience-Centered (YOUR RELEVANCE)

• Project assists novice audience in understanding interpersonal communication/relations • Inviting – Interesting – Creative – of significance

and value to reader/listener • Meaningful and clear explanations/analysis to audience (reader/viewer) who has never read this course

material. • Intent of project readily apparent to the viewer/listener – and has potential to impact their learning • Inclusion of written

audience/project summary