| Instructions: Enter total points possible in cell C14, under the rubric. Next enter scores (between 0 and 4) into yellow cells only in column F. |
| Interpreting Statistical Output for Data Analysis Presentation |
| | Unsatisfacotry | Satisfactory | Average | Excellent | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Defined Key Clinical Questions | Did not clearly define clinical question for research | Attempted to define clinical question, without any reference necessary for database search | Vaguely defined clinical question without the reference necessary for database research | Clearly defined key clinical question used to search evidence-based databank (i.e, Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, etc) | 0 | 20% | 0.00 |
| Database Review | Did not provide a review of the evidence from a database search | Provide a brief overview of database results, not clearly linked to high levels of evidence | Defined database results clearly, without generating a key clinical question | Defined database results clearly, generated from key clinical question database search results | 0 | 20% | 0.00 |
| Level 1 & 2 Evidence | Only referenced Level 5-7 evidence, based on expert opinion andcase study reviews. | Referenced research results from Level 4 and below | Only referenced Level 3 evidence | Referenced randomized control study research and systematic review of randomized control studies (Level 1 and 2 evidence) | 0 | 15% | 0.00 |
| Intrepretation of Statistical Results | Attemped to provide an overview of the evidence reviewed, but lacked statistically significant data. | Attemped to provide a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. But, unable to clearly intrept stength of evidence and the intrepretation was inaccurate. | Attemped to provide a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. But, unable to clearly intrept stength of evidence. | Provides a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. | 0 | 30% | 0.00 |
| Length | Less than 12 slides. | NA | NA | Presentation length 12-15. | 0 | 5% | 0.00 |
| Format/Style | Did not follow APA format | Major errors with APA formatting | Text, title page, and references page follow APA guidelines . Minor references and grammar errors | Text, title page and references page follow APA guidelines. No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. | 0 | 10% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | | 100% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | Final Score | | 0 |
| | | | | | Percentage | | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Total available points = | | | 4 |
| Rubric Score | | Grade points | | Percentage |
| Low | High | Low | High | Low | High |
| 3.5 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 90% | 100% |
| 2.5 | 3.49 | 0 | 0 | 80% | 89.99% |
| 1.7 | 2.49 | 0 | 0 | 70% | 79.99% |
| 1.0 | 1.69 | 0 | 0 | 60% | 69.99% |
| 0.0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59.99% |
sky1234
gradingRubricsforassingments.xlsx
