CIS 500 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT
lady5347
gradingrubricscis500.docxName: W03a1
Description: W03a1 - The CEO’s Challenge
|
|
Unacceptable |
Needs Improvement |
Competent |
Exemplary |
|
Identify the main functions of your proposed information system and why they are important to the business. |
Points: 0 (0.00%)
Inadequate or no information system proposed. Limited information on the system proposed, inadequate detail. Main functions and importance unclear. Feedback: |
Points: 19.5 (15.00%)
Proposed an information system. Somewhat identified the main functions. Importance of main functions are unclear. Feedback: |
Points: 22.1 (17.00%)
Proposed an original information system. Identified the main functions of the system. Explained the importance of each function to the business. Feedback: |
Points: 26 (20.00%)
Explained the stylistic choices for architecture of information system. Connected main functions of system to business needs and shadow IT. Feedback: |
|
Describe what types of data your information system will hold and how data quality will be ensured. |
Points: 0 (0.00%)
Inadequate description of data types. Inadequate connection of data storage to the system. Inadequate explanation of data quality measures. Feedback: |
Points: 24.375 (18.75%)
Described data types, somewhat connected to the system. Somewhat explained the data storage in system. Reasonable explanation of data quality measures. Feedback: |
Points: 27.625 (21.25%)
Described the data types in the system. Explained how the system would hold each data type. Proposed how data quality would be ensured. Feedback: |
Points: 32.5 (25.00%)
Explained the system storage and interaction with data. Considered the impacts of cost and maintenance on data quality. Feedback: |
|
Explain how the functions you mentioned are being handled by the old information system, the problems that occur, and why your information system will handle things better. |
Points: 0 (0.00%)
Limited description of old system, no explanation of functions. Inadequate problem identification with old system. Limited justification for selecting new system over the old one. Feedback: |
Points: 24.375 (18.75%)
Somewhat explained functions handled by the old information system. Reasonable description of problems of the old system. Reasonable justification for how the new system is better than the old. Feedback: |
Points: 27.625 (21.25%)
Explained how the main functions are being handled by the old information system. Described the problems of the old system. Justified why the new system can handle things better than the old system. Feedback: |
Points: 32.5 (25.00%)
Described why inefficiencies of maintenance in the old system persist. Provided options for keeping the system separate, integrating with old, or scaling up/down based on business needs. Feedback: |
|
Offer evidence of feasibility: Show that similar information systems have been built successfully and that they save more money than they cost. |
Points: 0 (0.00%)
Inadequate or unsuccessful system selected. Limited demonstration of cost savings. Inadequate defense of the new system to others. Feedback: |
Points: 19.5 (15.00%)
Identified one similar, successful information system. Somewhat demonstrated cost savings comparison. Reasonable comparison of the new system to other systems. Feedback: |
Points: 22.1 (17.00%)
Identified similar, successful information systems. Demonstrated cost savings comparison. Defended how the new system could operate similarly to successful systems. Feedback: |
Points: 26 (20.00%)
Explained what makes the information system identified similar to yours. Demonstrate how the new system outperforms similar systems. Feedback: |
|
Clarity, persuasion, proper communication, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. |
Points: 0 (0.00%)
Unclear structure, not persuasive, major grammatical errors. Feedback: |
Points: 9.75 (7.50%)
Somewhat clear structure, limited persuasion, grammatical errors, language too simple or too wordy. Feedback: |
Points: 11.05 (8.50%)
Clear structure, persuasive writing, minor or no grammatical errors, length and format within requirements, plain language. Feedback: |
Points: 13 (10.00%)
No grammatical errors, plain language, organized by topic, references business needs, connects to technical specs, persuasive. Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Identify the main functions of your proposed information system and why they are important to the business.--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points
Inadequate or no information system proposed. Limited information on the system proposed, inadequate detail. Main functions and importance unclear.
Needs Improvement 19.5 (15.00%) points
Proposed an information system. Somewhat identified the main functions. Importance of main functions are unclear.
Competent 22.1 (17.00%) points
Proposed an original information system. Identified the main functions of the system. Explained the importance of each function to the business.
Exemplary 26 (20.00%) points
Explained the stylistic choices for architecture of information system. Connected main functions of system to business needs and shadow IT.
Feedback:
Describe what types of data your information system will hold and how data quality will be ensured.--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points
Inadequate description of data types. Inadequate connection of data storage to the system. Inadequate explanation of data quality measures.
Needs Improvement 24.375 (18.75%) points
Described data types, somewhat connected to the system. Somewhat explained the data storage in system. Reasonable explanation of data quality measures.
Competent 27.625 (21.25%) points
Described the data types in the system. Explained how the system would hold each data type. Proposed how data quality would be ensured.
Exemplary 32.5 (25.00%) points
Explained the system storage and interaction with data. Considered the impacts of cost and maintenance on data quality.
Feedback:
Explain how the functions you mentioned are being handled by the old information system, the problems that occur, and why your information system will handle things better.--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points
Limited description of old system, no explanation of functions. Inadequate problem identification with old system. Limited justification for selecting new system over the old one.
Needs Improvement 24.375 (18.75%) points
Somewhat explained functions handled by the old information system. Reasonable description of problems of the old system. Reasonable justification for how the new system is better than the old.
Competent 27.625 (21.25%) points
Explained how the main functions are being handled by the old information system. Described the problems of the old system. Justified why the new system can handle things better than the old system.
Exemplary 32.5 (25.00%) points
Described why inefficiencies of maintenance in the old system persist. Provided options for keeping the system separate, integrating with old, or scaling up/down based on business needs.
Feedback:
Offer evidence of feasibility: Show that similar information systems have been built successfully and that they save more money than they cost.--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points
Inadequate or unsuccessful system selected. Limited demonstration of cost savings. Inadequate defense of the new system to others.
Needs Improvement 19.5 (15.00%) points
Identified one similar, successful information system. Somewhat demonstrated cost savings comparison. Reasonable comparison of the new system to other systems.
Competent 22.1 (17.00%) points
Identified similar, successful information systems. Demonstrated cost savings comparison. Defended how the new system could operate similarly to successful systems.
Exemplary 26 (20.00%) points
Explained what makes the information system identified similar to yours. Demonstrate how the new system outperforms similar systems.
Feedback:
Clarity, persuasion, proper communication, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.--
Levels of Achievement:
Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points
Unclear structure, not persuasive, major grammatical errors.
Needs Improvement 9.75 (7.50%) points
Somewhat clear structure, limited persuasion, grammatical errors, language too simple or too wordy.
Competent 11.05 (8.50%) points
Clear structure, persuasive writing, minor or no grammatical errors, length and format within requirements, plain language.
Exemplary 13 (10.00%) points
24.375 <span cla
0.2125
27.625 <span cla
0.25
0.15
32.5 <span class
0
0 <span class='ra
0.15
19.5 <span class
0.17
22.1 <span class
0.2
0.17
26 <span class='
0
0 <span class='ra
0.075
9.75 <span class
0.085
11.05 <span clas
0.2
0
0.1875
0.2125
0.25
0
0.1875
0.2125
0.25
0
0.15
0.17
0.2
0
0.075
0.085
0.1
Exit
0
0 <span class='ra
0.15
19.5 <span class
0.17
22.1 <span class
0.2
26 <span class='
0
0 <span class='ra
0.1875
24.375 <span cla
0.2125
27.625 <span cla
0.25
0
32.5 <span class
0
0 <span class='ra
0.1875
