Public H assmt 2

gradingrubricPublicHealth.pdf

Home >Social Science homework help >Public H assmt 2

9/18/22, 12:53 AM Assignment 2: Research Report (local issues) - HCAD 630 9041 Public Health Administration (2228) - UMGC Learning Manage…

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=1304652&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=718325 1/3

Grading Rubric Course: HCAD 630 9041 Public Health Administration (2228)

Criteria 90-100% 80-89% 70-79% 0-69% Criterion Score

Understandin

g of Issue

20%

/ 20

Clarity of

Presentation

(Logic,

References)

25%

/ 25

20 points

The work

demonstrates

clear

understanding

of the subject,

including its:

(1) history and

evolution, (2)

internal and

external

contributing

factors, (3)

participants

and

stakeholders,

and (4)

significance.

17.8 points

The work

demonstrates

significant

understanding

of the subject,

including its:

(1) history and

evolution, (2)

internal and

external

contributing

factors, (3)

participants

and

stakeholders,

and (4)

significance.

15.8 points

The work

demonstrates

minimal

understanding

of the subject,

including its:

(1) history and

evolution, (2)

internal and

external

contributing

factors, (3)

participants

and

stakeholders,

and (4)

significance.

5 points

The work

demonstrates

little or no

understanding

of the subject,

including its:

(1) history and

evolution, (2)

internal and

external

contributing

factors, (3)

participants

and

stakeholders,

and (4)

significance.

25 points

The work

demonstrates

sound and

compelling

logic in

incorporating

relevant

research in

terms of (1)

applicability,

(2) sufficiency

(i.e. more than

one source),

and (3)

currency.

The document

is well

organized,

straightforwar

d, easy to

understand,

and leads the

reader to an

informed

conclusion.

22.25 points

The work

demonstrates

adequate logic

incorporating

relevant

research in

terms of (1)

applicability,

(2) sufficiency

(i.e. more than

one source),

and (3)

currency.

The document

is generally

well organized,

straightforwar

d and

somewhat

easy to

understand,

but includes

extraneous

information or

questionable

findings as it

leads the

reader to a

conclusion.

19.75 points

The work

demonstrates

questionable

logic, relies on

literature that

is dated or

somewhat

irrelevant in

terms of (1)

applicability,

(2) sufficiency,

or (3) currency.

The document

is somewhat

disjointed, not

easy to

understand,

and the

conclusion is

difficult to

discern.

0 points

The work

employs faulty

logic, relying

on research

that is (1) not

applicable, (2)

too limited to

support the

analysis, or (3)

not current.

The document

is poorly

organized,

difficult to

understand, or

fails to reach a

cogent

conclusion.

9/18/22, 12:53 AM Assignment 2: Research Report (local issues) - HCAD 630 9041 Public Health Administration (2228) - UMGC Learning Manage…

https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=1304652&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=718325 2/3

Criteria 90-100% 80-89% 70-79% 0-69% Criterion Score

Comprehensi

veness of

Analysis 35%

/ 35

Quality of

Writing

(Grammar,

Format) 15%

/ 15

35 points

The work

demonstrates

clear, insightful

critical

thinking,

incorporating

relevant

research in

identifying the

(1) issues, (2)

interactions,

and (3)

implications of

the topic.

The work

considers both

readily

identifiable

factors and

more obscure

matters,

explore risks

and benefits,

and examines

multiple

aspects that

can or may

influence the

topic being

examined.

31.15 points

The work

demonstrates

a general

understanding

based on

relevant

research in

identifying the

(1) issues, (2)

interactions,

and (3)

implications of

the topic.

The work

considers

readily

identifiable

factors, but

omits

researching

more obscure

matters, focus