![]()
Assignment
Components
Originality and
Content
20%20
Argument
15%15
Organization
5%5
Grammar and
Spelling
5%5
Formatting
5%5
Effective
Research
10%10
Quality
Resources
10%10
Representation
(Ability to convert
relevant information
into various
mathematical or
quantitative forms)
10%10
Application &
Analysis
(Ability to make
judgments and draw
appropriate
conclusions based on
quantitative analysis of
data)
10%10
Communication
(Expressing
quantitative evidence
in support of work
produced)
10%10
100%100
*Uses appropriate nomenclature to present
work
*Uses correct format to illustrate findings
*Presents evidence in a logical manner
*Explains findings in a style suitable to the
audience to promote understanding
*Provides well considered responses to
questions
*Uses appropriate nomenclature to present
work
*Uses correct format to illustrate findings
*Presents evidence in a mostly logical manner
*Explains findings in a style suitable to the
audience to promote understanding
*Provides mostly well considered responses to
questions
*Uses somewhat appropriate nomenclature
to present work
*Uses mostly correct format to illustrate
findings
*Presents limited evidence in a mostly logical
manner
*Explains findings in a style suitable to the
audience to promote understanding
*Provides somewhat well considered
responses to questions
*Uses limited nomenclature to present work.
*Uses unconventional format to illustrate
findings
*Presents limited evidence or in an illogical
manner
*Limited explanation of findings in a style
that does little to promote understanding
*Provides limited responses to questions.
The student uses at least 3 quality peer-reviewed
and scholarly resource which may be website-
based, and 1 textbook-based resource to support
his/her argument.
The student does not use or has limited use of
quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources
and/or the work only contains website-based
resources and/or only uses the textbook to support
his/ her argument.
Quantitative Reasoning
Uses the quantitative analysis of data:
*as the basis for insightful, carefully
qualified and supported conclusions
*provides detailed descriptions of complex
business problems
Uses the quantitative analysis of data:
*as the basis for competent, reasonable,
appropriately qualified and mostly supported
conclusions
*provides good descriptions of complex
business problems
Uses the quantitative analysis of data:
*as the basis for basic, plausible conclusions
with limited qualification and supported
conclusions
*little in the way of describing complex
business problems
Uses the quantitative analysis of data:
*as the basis for tentative, basic conclusions
with little or no qualifications or supported
conclusions *limited
or no description of complex business
problems
The paper has limited or lacks: *logical
flow
*use of APA headings
*introduction and/or conclusion
Student is skillful in representing data in the
correct statistical format and can defend his
or her choice of methodology in doing so.
Student competently represents data in the
correct statistical format and can defend his or
her choice of methodology in doing so.
Student represents data in a mostly correct
statistical format and can somewhat defend
his or her choice of methodology in doing so.
Student is unable to represent data in a
correct statistical format and cannot defend
his or her choice of methodology in doing so.
The paper follows all formatting guidelines,
including page-length, APA formatting
requirements, correctly formatted in text
citations, and correctly formatted references
and reference page
The paper follows all or most formatting
guidelines, including page-length, APA
formatting requirements, mostly correctly
formatted in text citations, and mostly correctly
formatted references and reference page
The paper only follows some formatting
guidelines, including page-length, APA
formatting requirements, some correctly
formatted in text citations, and some
correctly formatted references and reference
page
The paper fails to follow formatting
guidelines, including page-length and APA
formatting requirements to a substantial
degree. Limited or no correctly formatted in
text citations, references, and reference page
Research Components
Student demonstrates the ability to:
*draw logical and valid conclusions
*provide supporting researched-based
evidence including peer reviewed articles
*utilize the textbook, online databases and
the internet to locate supporting literature
Student demonstrates some ability to:
*draw logical and valid conclusions
*provide supporting researched-based
evidence including peer reviewed articles
*utilize the textbook, online databases and the
internet to locate supporting literature
Student demonstrates limited ability to:
*draw logical and valid conclusions
*provide supporting researched-based
evidence including peer reviewed articles
*utilize the textbook, online databases and
the internet to locate supporting literature
Student demonstrates limited to no ability to:
*draw logical and valid conclusions
*provide supporting researched-based
evidence including peer reviewed articles
*utilize the textbook, online databases and
the internet to locate supporting literature
The student uses at least 5 quality peer-reviewed
and scholarly resources (non-website based) and
1 textbook-based resource to support his/her
argument.
The student uses at least 4 quality peer-reviewed and
scholarly resources (non-website based) and 1
textbook-based resource to support his/her
argument.
The paper contains correct grammar,
spelling, and sentence structure.
The paper contains correct grammar with only
minor errors in spelling, and/or sentence
structure.
The paper contains some grammatical errors,
misspellings, and may contain inadequate
sentence structure.
The paper lacks correct grammar, has
misspelled words and weak sentence
structure in multiple paragraphs.
The paper is content rich, all questions and
their parts have been answered
demonstrating: *critical
analysis *application of
learned concepts to real world
*research-based evidence
*originality with a maximum similarity index
of 20%.
The paper is content rich, most questions and
their parts have been answered demonstrating:
*critical analysis *example
application of learned concepts
*research-based evidence
*originality with a maximum similarity index of
22%.
The paper contains relevant content, some
questions and their parts have been
answered demonstrating:
*some critical analysis
*example of learned concepts
*research-based evidence
*originality with a maximum similarity index
of 25%.
The paper lacks relevant content, some
questions and their parts have been
answered demonstrating:
*limited critical analysis
*limited or no example of learned concepts
*limited or no research-based evidence
*similarity index exceeds 25%.
The paper:
*demonstrates effective, well supported
argument
*provides supporting evidence for argument
*demonstrates a strong relationship
between argument and assignment
requirements
The paper:
*demonstrates the ability to support an
argument
* provides some supporting evidence for the
argument
*demonstrates some relationship between
argument and assignment requirements
The paper:
*demonstrates limited support for the
argument
*provides limited evidence for the argument
*demonstrates a limited relationship
between argument and assignment
requirements
The paper:
*demonstrates limited or no support for the
argument
*provides limited or no evidence for the
argument
*has a limited or no relationship between
argument and assignment requirements
Writing Components
The paper is well organized and includes:
*logical flow
*correct use of APA headings
*introduction and conclusion
The paper is well organized for the most part
with an adequate degree of:
*logical flow
*use of APA headings
*introduction and conclusion
The paper is somewhat organized with:
*a non-continuous logical flow
*some use of APA headings
*limited introduction and/or conclusion
MBA PROGRAM - Quantitative
Professional Assignment (PA) Comprehensive Learning Assessment (CLA) Applied Learning Assignment (ALA) Grading Rubric
ExemplaryProficientNeeds ImprovementUnsatisfactory
% of Overall
Grade
Points
Possible
gnkhl14
GradingRubricforPAsandCLAs.docx
0
