Graduate power point on HIV

profileRisingKing
GradingRubricforOnlinePresentationofCaseStudy.htm.zip

Grading Rubric for Online Presentation of Case Study.htm

[removed] [removed] [removed]

Grading Rubric for Online Presentation of Case Study

Criteria

Grade Determinants

Points

Possible

Points

Earned

Preparation and

Presentation

30 Points

Written presentation is thorough, presented in a logical sequence and is accurate. Presentation is accurately referenced in APA formatting with reliable scientific sources. �Notes� function in PowerPoint is well utilized to include additional research and citations.

30

 

Written presentation is either not thorough or is not presented in a logical sequence but is accurate

20

 

Written presentation is not thorough and is not presented in a logical sequence but is accurate.

10

 

Written presentation contains inaccuracies.

0

 

Content

Knowledge

70 Points

1a. Defines the disease process and identifies all essential history data that should be obtained and does not include data that is not directly related to the case study. *use note function in PowerPoint to include additional details & research

25

 

�1b.Omits an essential component of patient history and/or includes irrelevant data not pertinent to the case study.

10

 

1c. Omits two or more essential components of patient history and/or includes irrelevant data.

0

 

2a. Accurately and thoroughly explains the pathophysiology related to the presenting symptoms or problems and does not include data that is not directly related to the case study.

25

 

2b. Explanation of the pathophysiology is accurate but lacking thoroughness.

10

 

2c. Explanation of the pathophysiology is inaccurate.

0

 

3a. Critical Event Flow Chart (CEFC) accurately and thoroughly explains the linkage of altered pathophysiology related to the presenting symptoms or problems and does not include data that is not directly related to the case study.

20

 

3b. Explanation of the CEFC is accurate but lacking thoroughness.

10

 

3c. Explanation of the CEFC is inaccurate.

0

 

 

�100Total Points