Need a discussion post by 11 am EST March 17th

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

ExcellentPoint range: 90–100 Good Point range: 80–89

Fair Point range: 70–79

Poor Point range: 0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the case study discussion questions includes appropriate diagnoses with explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options as directed, is based on evidence-based research where appropriate, and is incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

40 (40%) - 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s).

Post includes approprite diagnoses including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options.

Incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of post the post having exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.

35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

Post includes approprite diagnoses with explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options.

Somewhat incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the post having exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least 3 credible references.

31 (31%) - 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

Post contains incomplete or vague diagnoses or explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options.

Is somewhat lacking in synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.

0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s).

Post contains incomplete diagnoses or explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options, or diagnoses and/or explanations are missing.

Lacks synthesis gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Contains only 1 or no credible references.

Main Posting:

Writing

6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main discussion by due date.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Posts main discussion by due date.

Meets requirements for full participation.

7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Posts main discussion by due date.

0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main discussion by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague's main post that is re!ective and justi"ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth.

0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

First Response: Writing

6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is e!ectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Response posed in the discussion may lack e!ective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Responses posted in the discussion lack e!ective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Posts by due date.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response: Post to colleague's main post that is re!ective and justi"ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth.

0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

Second Response: Writing

6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is e!ectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Response posed in the discussion may lack e!ective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Responses posted in the discussion lack e!ective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Posts by due date.

0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6552_Week3_Case_Study_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

Name: NRNP_6552_Week3_Case_Study_Discussion_Rubric

EXIT

3/16/21, 22:05 Page 1 of 1