Persuasive Speech Feedback

profilevk4queen
Gradingrubricandfeedback.docx

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

Proficient

Competent

Improvement Needed

Non-Existent/Needs Work

Outline

4 points

Outline is in excellent organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).

3 points

Outline is in good organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).

2 points

Outline is in somewhat organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).

0 points

Outline is in not in organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA) or no outline submitted.

4 / 4

Introduction: Opening Statement

4 points

The Opening statement was powerful and captivated the audience

 

3 points

The Opening Statement was good and interested the audience

 

2 points

The Opening statement was somewhat sufficient and generally interested the audience

 

0 points

The Opening statement was ineffective and did not captivate the audience

4 / 4

Introduction: Central Idea

4 points

The CI was an excellent summary of the speech

 

3 points

The CI was a good summary of the speech

 

2 points

The CI was an adequate summary of the speech

 

0 points

There was no clear Central Idea.

4 / 4

Introduction: Supporting Points

4 points

The SP’s were effectively stated and mapped out the speech

 

3 points

The SP’s were generally stated and mapped out the speech

 

2 points

The SP’s were somewhat stated and gave a generally mapped out the speech

 

0 points

The SP’s were not stated and there was no clear map of speech

4 / 4

Introduction: Established Personal Credibility

4 points

The Speaker effectively establish their credibility

 

3 points

The Speaker basically establish their credibility

 

2 points

The Speaker somewhat establish their credibility

 

0 points

The Speaker did not establish their credibility

4 / 4

Introduction: Motivated the Audience

4 points

The Speaker effectively motivated the audience

 

3 points

The Speaker generally motivated the audience

 

2 points

The Speaker somewhat or indirectly motivated the audience

 

0 points

The Speaker did not motivated the audience

4 / 4

Topic: Audience & Speaker

2 points

The topic was clearly appropriate for the Audience & Speaker

 

1 point

The topic was appropriate for the Audience & Speaker

 

0.5 points

The topic was somewhat appropriate for the Audience & Speaker

 

0 points

The topic was not appropriate for the Audience & Speaker

2 / 2

Topic: Time Limits

8 points

The Speaker achieved their time limits

 

6 points

The Speaker basically achieved their time limits (A little over or a little less)

 

2 points

The Speaker went over or under their time limits

 

0 points

The Speaker did not achieved their time limits

8 / 8

Purpose: Clarity

2 points

The purpose of the speech was very clear and specific to the audience

 

1 point

The purpose of the speech was clear to the audience

 

0.5 points

The purpose of the speech was somewhat clear to the audience

 

0 points

The purpose of the speech was not clear to the audience

2 / 2

Purpose: Achieved

4 points

The purpose of the speech was successfully achieved

 

3 points

The purpose of the speech was generally achieved

 

2 points

The purpose of the speech was somewhat achieved

 

0 points

The purpose of the speech was not achieved

3 / 4

Organization: Intro, Body, Conclusion

4 points

The speech had a clearly defined I-B-C

 

3 points

The speech had a generally defined I-B-C

 

2 points

The speech had a somewhat defined I-B-C

 

0 points

The speech did not have a defined I-B-C

4 / 4

Organization: Transitions and Signposts

4 points

The Speaker mastered the use of transitions

 

3 points

The Speaker had good use of transitions

 

2 points

The Speaker somewhat used transitions

 

0 points

The Speaker did not use transitions

3 / 4

Organization: Main Points

4 points

Main points were exceptionally clear to the audience

 

3 points

Main points were generally clear to the audience

 

2 points

Main points were somewhat clear to the audience

 

0 points

Main points were not clear to the audience

4 / 4

Supporting Material: Credibility

4 points

The Speaker stated and/or displayed all sources correctly

 

3 points

The Speaker stated and/or displayed most sources correctly

 

2 points

The Speaker stated and/or displayed some sources correctly

 

0 points

The Speaker did not state and/or display any sources correctly

2 / 4

Supporting Material: Information was Varied and Interesting

4 points

The information was very interesting to the audience

 

3 points

The information was interesting to the audience

 

2 points

The information was somewhat interesting to the audience

 

0 points

The information was not interesting to the audience

4 / 4

Visual Aids: Design

4 points

Excellent design - added significant support to speech

 

3 points

Decent design – added appropriate support

 

2 points

General design – added some support

 

0 points

VA’s did not support the speech

2 / 4

Visual Aids: Control

4 points

The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout the entire speech

 

3 points

The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout most of the speech

 

2 points

The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout some of the speech

 

0 points

The Speaker did not maintained control of VA’s throughout speech

3 / 4

Delivery: Eye Contact

4 points

Speaker made consistent and sustained eye contact throughout speech

 

3 points

Speaker made eye contact throughout most of speech

 

2 points

Speaker made some eye contact throughout speech

 

0 points

Speaker made little or no eye contact throughout speech

3 / 4

Delivery: Voice & Tone

4 points

Voice was consistently sustained and leveled

 

3 points

Voice was generally sustained and leveled

 

2 points

Voice was monotone or sub-level, sometimes inaudible

 

0 points

Voice was inaudible

4 / 4

Delivery: Gestures & Posture

4 points

Gestures were controlled and effective

 

3 points

Gestures were generally controlled and effective

 

2 points

Gestures were somewhat controlled and/or distracted from message

 

0 points

Gestures were ineffective and distracted from message

4 / 4

Delivery: Flow

4 points

Speech had a consistent smooth pace

 

3 points

Speech had a generally smooth pace

 

2 points

Speech had a somewhat smooth pace; there were some awkward pauses

 

0 points

Speech did not have a smooth pace; there were many awkward pauses

3 / 4

Delivery: Energy

4 points

The Speaker maintained high energy throughout speech

 

3 points

The Speaker maintained decent energy throughout speech

 

2 points

The Speaker had some energy throughout speech

 

0 points

The Speaker had no energy throughout speech

4 / 4

Conclusion: Summarized Main Points

4 points

Main points of the speech were clearly and specifically restated

 

3 points

Main points of the speech were generally restated

 

2 points

Main points of the speech were somewhat restated; no direct reference to main points

 

0 points

Main points of the speech were not restated

4 / 4

Conclusion: Closing Statement

4 points

The Closing statement was powerful and captivated the audience

 

3 points

The Closing Statement was good and interested the audience

 

2 points

The Closing statement was somewhat sufficient and generally interested the audience

 

0 points

The Closing statement was ineffective and did not captivate the audience

4 / 4

Audience Centered/Adapted to Listeners & Ethics: Sources, Viewpoints & Purpose

4 points

The Speaker was very conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

&

The Speaker was very conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

 

3 points

The Speaker mostly considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and mostly monitored and engaged the audience

 

&

The Speaker was generally conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

 

2 points

The Speaker occasionally considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and occasionally monitored and engaged the audience

&

The Speaker was somewhat conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

 

0 points

The Speaker somewhat and/or did not considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and did not monitored and engaged the audience

&

The Speaker was not conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience

3 / 4

Rubric Total ScoreTotal

90 / 100

Feed Back:

good intro w/establishing credibility; good tone of voice; need more eye contact for audience engagement; too much text in your ppt, be sure to reduce it in final speech; make sure you control your slides; mostly good transitions between slides/ideas, a few were awkward & interrupted your flow; good use of imagery; not enough oral citations; good concluding statement & summary; time 7:26