Persuasive Speech Feedback
|
|
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
Proficient
Competent
Improvement Needed
Non-Existent/Needs Work
Outline
4 points
Outline is in excellent organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).
3 points
Outline is in good organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).
2 points
Outline is in somewhat organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA).
0 points
Outline is in not in organizational format with work cited at the bottom in correct citation format (APA) or no outline submitted.
4 / 4
Introduction: Opening Statement
4 points
|
The Opening statement was powerful and captivated the audience |
|
3 points
|
The Opening Statement was good and interested the audience |
|
2 points
|
The Opening statement was somewhat sufficient and generally interested the audience |
|
0 points
|
The Opening statement was ineffective and did not captivate the audience |
|
|
4 / 4
Introduction: Central Idea
4 points
|
The CI was an excellent summary of the speech |
|
3 points
|
The CI was a good summary of the speech |
|
2 points
|
The CI was an adequate summary of the speech |
|
0 points
|
There was no clear Central Idea. |
|
|
4 / 4
Introduction: Supporting Points
4 points
|
The SP’s were effectively stated and mapped out the speech |
|
3 points
|
The SP’s were generally stated and mapped out the speech |
|
2 points
|
The SP’s were somewhat stated and gave a generally mapped out the speech |
|
0 points
|
The SP’s were not stated and there was no clear map of speech |
|
|
4 / 4
Introduction: Established Personal Credibility
4 points
|
The Speaker effectively establish their credibility |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker basically establish their credibility |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker somewhat establish their credibility |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not establish their credibility |
|
|
4 / 4
Introduction: Motivated the Audience
4 points
|
The Speaker effectively motivated the audience |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker generally motivated the audience |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker somewhat or indirectly motivated the audience |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not motivated the audience |
|
|
4 / 4
Topic: Audience & Speaker
2 points
|
The topic was clearly appropriate for the Audience & Speaker |
|
1 point
|
The topic was appropriate for the Audience & Speaker |
|
0.5 points
|
The topic was somewhat appropriate for the Audience & Speaker |
|
0 points
|
The topic was not appropriate for the Audience & Speaker |
|
|
2 / 2
Topic: Time Limits
8 points
|
The Speaker achieved their time limits |
|
6 points
|
The Speaker basically achieved their time limits (A little over or a little less) |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker went over or under their time limits |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not achieved their time limits |
|
|
8 / 8
Purpose: Clarity
2 points
|
The purpose of the speech was very clear and specific to the audience |
|
1 point
|
The purpose of the speech was clear to the audience |
|
0.5 points
|
The purpose of the speech was somewhat clear to the audience |
|
0 points
|
The purpose of the speech was not clear to the audience |
|
|
2 / 2
Purpose: Achieved
4 points
|
The purpose of the speech was successfully achieved |
|
3 points
|
The purpose of the speech was generally achieved |
|
2 points
|
The purpose of the speech was somewhat achieved |
|
0 points
|
The purpose of the speech was not achieved |
|
|
3 / 4
Organization: Intro, Body, Conclusion
4 points
|
The speech had a clearly defined I-B-C |
|
3 points
|
The speech had a generally defined I-B-C |
|
2 points
|
The speech had a somewhat defined I-B-C |
|
0 points
|
The speech did not have a defined I-B-C |
|
|
4 / 4
Organization: Transitions and Signposts
4 points
|
The Speaker mastered the use of transitions |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker had good use of transitions |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker somewhat used transitions |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not use transitions |
|
|
3 / 4
Organization: Main Points
4 points
|
Main points were exceptionally clear to the audience |
|
3 points
|
Main points were generally clear to the audience |
|
2 points
|
Main points were somewhat clear to the audience |
|
0 points
|
Main points were not clear to the audience |
|
|
4 / 4
Supporting Material: Credibility
4 points
|
The Speaker stated and/or displayed all sources correctly |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker stated and/or displayed most sources correctly |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker stated and/or displayed some sources correctly |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not state and/or display any sources correctly |
|
|
2 / 4
Supporting Material: Information was Varied and Interesting
4 points
|
The information was very interesting to the audience |
|
3 points
|
The information was interesting to the audience |
|
2 points
|
The information was somewhat interesting to the audience |
|
0 points
|
The information was not interesting to the audience |
|
|
4 / 4
Visual Aids: Design
4 points
|
Excellent design - added significant support to speech |
|
3 points
|
Decent design – added appropriate support |
|
2 points
|
General design – added some support |
|
0 points
|
VA’s did not support the speech |
|
|
2 / 4
Visual Aids: Control
4 points
|
The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout the entire speech |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout most of the speech |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker maintained control of VA’s throughout some of the speech |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker did not maintained control of VA’s throughout speech |
|
|
3 / 4
Delivery: Eye Contact
4 points
|
Speaker made consistent and sustained eye contact throughout speech |
|
3 points
|
Speaker made eye contact throughout most of speech |
|
2 points
|
Speaker made some eye contact throughout speech |
|
0 points
|
Speaker made little or no eye contact throughout speech |
|
|
3 / 4
Delivery: Voice & Tone
4 points
|
Voice was consistently sustained and leveled |
|
3 points
|
Voice was generally sustained and leveled |
|
2 points
|
Voice was monotone or sub-level, sometimes inaudible |
|
0 points
|
Voice was inaudible |
|
|
4 / 4
Delivery: Gestures & Posture
4 points
|
Gestures were controlled and effective |
|
3 points
|
Gestures were generally controlled and effective |
|
2 points
|
Gestures were somewhat controlled and/or distracted from message |
|
0 points
|
Gestures were ineffective and distracted from message |
|
|
4 / 4
Delivery: Flow
4 points
|
Speech had a consistent smooth pace |
|
3 points
|
Speech had a generally smooth pace |
|
2 points
|
Speech had a somewhat smooth pace; there were some awkward pauses |
|
0 points
|
Speech did not have a smooth pace; there were many awkward pauses |
|
|
3 / 4
Delivery: Energy
4 points
|
The Speaker maintained high energy throughout speech |
|
3 points
|
The Speaker maintained decent energy throughout speech |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker had some energy throughout speech |
|
0 points
|
The Speaker had no energy throughout speech |
|
|
4 / 4
Conclusion: Summarized Main Points
4 points
|
Main points of the speech were clearly and specifically restated |
|
3 points
|
Main points of the speech were generally restated |
|
2 points
|
Main points of the speech were somewhat restated; no direct reference to main points |
|
0 points
|
Main points of the speech were not restated |
|
|
4 / 4
Conclusion: Closing Statement
4 points
|
The Closing statement was powerful and captivated the audience |
|
3 points
|
The Closing Statement was good and interested the audience |
|
2 points
|
The Closing statement was somewhat sufficient and generally interested the audience |
|
0 points
|
The Closing statement was ineffective and did not captivate the audience |
|
|
4 / 4
Audience Centered/Adapted to Listeners & Ethics: Sources, Viewpoints & Purpose
4 points
|
The Speaker was very conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience & The Speaker was very conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience |
|
3 points
& The Speaker was generally conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience |
|
2 points
|
The Speaker occasionally considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and occasionally monitored and engaged the audience & The Speaker was somewhat conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience |
|
0 points
The Speaker somewhat and/or did not considered the audience with the elements of the speechmaking process and did not monitored and engaged the audience
&
The Speaker was not conscious of their presentation skills, and relating and responding to the audience
3 / 4
Rubric Total ScoreTotal
90 / 100
Feed Back:
good intro w/establishing credibility; good tone of voice; need more eye contact for audience engagement; too much text in your ppt, be sure to reduce it in final speech; make sure you control your slides; mostly good transitions between slides/ideas, a few were awkward & interrupted your flow; good use of imagery; not enough oral citations; good concluding statement & summary; time 7:26