Indian Health Services- 4pages-APA format- Must use at least four scholarly or governmental sources, two of which must be scholarly that highlight the importance of improving Indian Health Services.
bballv2003
gradingrubric2.docExamines the I.H.S. And Provides the Year They Were Established/Created, Their 2015 Fiscal Budget, the Relationship They Have With Local Health Offices, the Approximate Number of Employees, the Estimated Size of the Population They Serve, And How the Chosen Agencies Were Impacted By the Affordable Care Act
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly examines the Indian Health Services agency and in a detailed and organized manner, lists all of the required information.
Proficient - Examines the Indian Health Services agency and, lists most of the required information. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially examines the Indian Health Services agency and, lists most of the required information. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to examine the Indian Health Services agency and list the required information; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - No coherent attempt to describe the Indian Health Services agency.
Describes How the Budget and Number of Employees Compares to That of Other Agencies
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Provides a detailed an accurate description of the budget and number of employees when compared with other health agencies.
Proficient - Provides a description of the budget and number of employees when compared with other health agencies. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.
Basic - Provides a description of the budget and number of employees when compared with other health agencies. Relevant details are missing and /or inaccurate.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a description of the budget and number of employees when compared with other health agencies; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.
Non-Performance - No coherent attempt made to describe the budget or number of employees compared to other health agencies.
Describes Whether Or Not Marginalization At This Level Has Been Seen Or Experienced (Whether That Be Through Race, Religion, Or Orientation,) and What Methods Could Be Offered to Increase Self-Empowerment in This Population
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Provides a detailed description regarding marginalization of this population and a comprehensive reason for how self-empowerment could be utilized.
Proficient - Provides an explanation regarding marginalization of this population and a comprehensive reason for how self-empowerment could be utilized. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Student provides a limited explanation regarding marginalization of this population and a reason for how self-empowerment could be utilized. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Student attempts to provide an explanation regarding marginalization of this population and a reason for how self-empowerment could be utilized; however significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - No coherent discussion of marginalization or self-empowerment has occurred.
Explains, in Personal View, Supported By Outside Sources, What Has Gone Wrong With Indian Health Services in Terms of Caring For and Treating the Population it Was Created to Serve
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Student provides a detailed and personal account of why they feel Indian Health Services have failed this population. Source support is present throughout.
Proficient - Student provides a detailed and personal account of why they feel Indian Health Services have failed this population. Source support is present. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Student provides a somewhat detailed and personal account of why they feel Indian Health Services have failed this population. Source support is sporadic. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Student provides a personal account of why they feel Indian Health Services have failed this population. Source support is very poor; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - No coherent discussion of personal views has occurred regarding HIS and its failings to the population served.
Explains Whether Or Not the Work of Physicians Like Dr. Erik Brodt to Encourage Native American Health Professionals to Engage More With Tribal Communities is a Worthwhile Endeavor, and Highlights Any Potential Negatives Associated With This Outreach
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Provides thorough explanation on whether or not Dr. Brodt’s work will be received and whether or not it is effective. Both positive and negative aspects are highlighted well.
Proficient - Provides an explanation on whether or not Dr. Brodt’s work will be received and whether or not it is effective. Both positive and negative aspects are highlighted well. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Provides a limited explanation on whether or not Dr. Brodt’s work will be received and whether or not it is effective. Both positive and negative aspects are minimally highlighted. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide an explanation on whether or not they believe Dr. Brodt’s work will be received and whether or not it is effective; however, both positive and negative aspects are not highlighted, and significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - No coherent discussion of Dr. Brodt’s work is present.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
